Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 63–72 | Cite as

Characteristics of Callers to the Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men

Original Paper

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) by women against men has been the subject of much debate. Feminists typically argue that IPV is committed only by men against women. Others argue that violence is a human problem and women also commit much IPV. To resolve these debates, IPV has been classified into two categories: common couple violence captured by population-based studies, and patriarchal terrorism, captured by studies of battered women. This typology ignores male victims of extreme IPV. The current study addresses this omission by describing 190 male callers to the Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men. All callers experienced physical abuse from their female partners, and a substantial minority feared their wives’ violence and were stalked. Over 90% experienced controlling behaviors, and several men reported frustrating experiences with the domestic violence system. Callers’ reports indicated that their female abusers had a history of trauma, alcohol/drug problems, mental illness, and homicidal and suicidal ideations.

Keywords

Abused men Intimate partner violence Domestic violence Female violence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Family Research Laboratory and Crimes Against Children Research Center's seminar group for their helpful comments on a previous version of this article.

References

  1. Cate, R. M., Henton, J. M., Koval, J., Christopher, F. S., & Lloyd, S. (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 3, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coleman, D. H., & Straus, M. A. (1983). Alcohol abuse and family violence. In E. Gottlheil, K. A. Druley, T. E. Skoloda, & H. M. Waxman (Eds.), Alcohol, drug abuse, and aggression (pp. 104–124). Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  3. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1988). Research as social action: The struggle for battered women. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 51–74). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71–91.Google Scholar
  5. Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  6. Felson, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2000). The control motive in intimate partner violence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Follingstad, D. R., Wright, S., Lloyd, S., & Sebastian, J. A. (1991). Sex differences in motivations and effects in dating violence. Family Relations, 40, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gondolf, E. W. (1999). Characteristics of court-mandated batterers in four cities. Violence Against Women, 5, 1277–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hines, D. A., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2001). Psychological effects of partner abuse against men: A neglected research area. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Violence and Victims, 18, 197–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stewart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kurz, D. (1993). Physical assaults by husbands: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 88–103). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McDonald, G. W. (1980). Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970–1979. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 10, 841–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Melton, H. C., & Belknap, J. (2003). He hits, she hits: Assessing gender differences and similarities in officially reported intimate partner violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 328–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morse, B. J. (1995). Beyond the conflict tactics scale: Assessing gender differences in partner violence. Violence and Victims, 10, 251–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nosek, M. A., Howland, C. A., & Young, M. E. (1997). Abuse of women with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 8, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Leary, K. D., Barling, J., Arias, I., Rosenbaum, A., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 263–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1983). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth Model. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Pleck, E., Pleck, J. H., Grossman, M., & Bart, P. B. (1977). The battered data syndrome: A comment on Steinmetz's article. Victimology: An International Journal, 2, 680–683.Google Scholar
  22. Rennison, C. M. (2003). Intimate partner violence, 1993–2001. Retrieved March 17, 2004, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/ pub/pdf/ipv01.pdf.Google Scholar
  23. Steinmetz, S. K. (1977). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology, 2, 499–509.Google Scholar
  24. Straus, M. A. (1990). Injury and frequency of assault and the ‘representative sample fallcy’ in measuring wife beating and child abuse. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations in 8,145 families (pp. 75–89). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  25. Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 67–87). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Straus, M. A. (1997). Physical assaults by women partners: A major social problem. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), Women, men, and gender: Ongoing debates (pp. 210–221). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1988). How violent are American families? Estimates from the national family violence resurvey and other studies. In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatrick, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Family abuse and its consequences: New directions in research (pp. 14–36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Garden City, NJ: Anchor.Google Scholar
  30. Swan, S. C., & Snow, D. L. (2003). Behavioral and psychological differences among abused women who use violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 9, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walker, L. E. A. (1989). Psychology and violence against women. American Psychologist, 44, 695–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walker, L. E. A. (2000). The battered woman syndrome (2nd edn.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of Massachusetts-LowellLowellUSA
  2. 2.Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and WomenHarmonyUSA
  3. 3.Family Interventions ProjectGrers ValleyUSA

Personalised recommendations