Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 235–239 | Cite as

Significance of Family Risk Factors in Development of Childhood Animal Cruelty in Adolescent Boys with Conduct Problems

  • Alexander Duncan
  • Jay C. Thomas
  • Catherine Miller
Article

Abstract

The literature suggests that physical child abuse, sexual child abuse, paternal alcoholism, paternal unavailability, and domestic violence may be significant in development of childhood animal cruelty. Two groups of early- to late adolescent boys (CTA and N-CTA) in residential treatment for conduct disorder were compared in the current study on histories of these family risk factors. The adolescents in Group 1 were comprised of boys who had conduct problems with documented histories of animal cruelty (n = 50; CTA). Group 2 consisted of adolescent boys (n = 50; N-CTA) with conduct problems, but without documented histories of animal cruelty. Results showed that children in the CTA group had significantly greater histories of physical and/or sexual child abuse and domestic violence in comparison to children in the N-CTA group. These results suggest that physical and/or sexual abuse to a child, and exposure to domestic violence, may be significant in the development of childhood animal cruelty.

Keywords

childhood animal cruelty physical child abuse sexual child abuse family violence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ascione, F. R. (1992). Enhancing children's attitudes about humane treatment of animals: Generalization to human-directed empathy. Anthrozoos 5: 176–191.Google Scholar
  2. Duncan, A., and Miller, C. (2002). The impact of an abusive family context on childhood animal cruelty and adult violence. Aggress. Violent Behav. 7: 365–383.Google Scholar
  3. Felthous, A. R. (1980). Aggression against cats, dogs, and people. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 10: 169–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fendrich, M., Warner, V., and Weissman, M. M. (1990). Family risk factors, parental depression and psychopathology in offspring. Dev. Psychol. 26: 40–50.Google Scholar
  5. Guzder, J., Paris, J., Zelkowitz, P., and Feldman, R. (1999). Psychological risk factors for borderline pathology in school-age children. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolescent Psychiatry 38: 206–212.Google Scholar
  6. Kilgore, K., Snyder, J., and Lentz, C. (2000). The contributions of parental discipline, parental monitoring, and school risk factors to early-onset conduct problems in African American boys and girls. Dev. Psychol. 36: 835–845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kupperman, S., Schlosser, S. S., Jama Lidral, M. A. T., and Reich, W. (1999). Relationship of child psychopathology to parental alcoholism and antisocial personality disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolescent Psychiatry 38: 686–692.Google Scholar
  8. Lyons-Ruth, K. (1996). Attachment relationships among children with aggressive behavior problems: The role of disorganized early attachment patterns. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 64: 62–73.Google Scholar
  9. McCabe, K. M., Hough, R., Wood, P. A., and Yeh, M. (2001). Childhood and adolescent onset conduct disorder: A test of the developmental taxonomy. J. Abnormal Psychol. 29: 305–316.Google Scholar
  10. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., and Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Shaw, D. S., Bell, R. Q., and Gilliom, M. (2000). A truly early starter model of antisocial behavior revisited. Clin. Child Family Psychol. Rev. 3: 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Toupin, J., Déry, M., Pauzé, R., Mercier, H., and Fortin, L. (2000). Cognitive and familial contributions to conduct disorder in children. J. Child Psychol Psychiatry 41: 333–344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Duncan
    • 1
  • Jay C. Thomas
    • 2
    • 3
  • Catherine Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Professional PsychologyPacific UniversityForest Grove
  2. 2.School of Professional PsychologyPacific UniversityPortland
  3. 3.School of Professional PsychologyPacific UniversityPortland

Personalised recommendations