Advertisement

Journal of Fluorescence

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 91–100 | Cite as

A Selective Turn off Fluorescence Sensor Based on Propranolol-SDS Assemblies for Fe3+ Detection

  • Varsha Gujar
  • Vijay Sangale
  • Divya OttoorEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

A fluorophore modulation with sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) assemblies for the selective and sensitive sensing of Fe3+ ions in aqueous solution is illustrated in this work. Emission spectral characteristics of fluorescent molecule, propranolol (PPH) was intact in presence of metal ions. While on modulation with SDS assemblies, PPH was transformed into a tuneable sensor for Fe3+ ions. This sensor ensemble was not only highly sensitive towards Fe3+ ions in aqueous solution with detection limits lower than 3 μM but also possess high discriminating efficiency in presence of other metal ions like Cu2+, Pb2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Fe2+, Cd2+, Co2+, Al3+, Mg2+, Hg2+ and Mn2+. The electrostatic interaction of the anionic group of surfactants with the metal cations significantly increases the communication between metal ions and PPH moiety which results in the quenching of PPH fluorescence. We have employed fluorescence steady state and lifetime studies to understand the metal sensing behaviour of the PPH-SDS sensor system. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of the developed sensor system towards Fe3+ ions.

Keywords

Propranolol SDS Fluorescence quenching Tuneable sensor Selective detection Fe3+ ions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by BCUD, Savitribai Phule Pune University (15SCI002263). Gujar Varsha acknowledges the research fellowship from BARTI, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

References

  1. 1.
    Hossain Z, Brennan J (2011) β-Galactosidase-based colorimetric paper sensor for determination of heavy metals. Anal Chem 83:8772–8778.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac202290d CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Das P, Mallick A, Sarkar D, Chattopadhyay N (2008) Application of anionic micelle for dramatic enhancement in the quenching-based metal ion fluorosensing. J Colloid Interface Sci 320:9–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.12.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wolfbeis O (1993) Fluorescence spectroscopy: new methods and applications. Springer-Verlag, New York https://www.springer.com/in/book/9783642773747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Santos H, Pedras B, Tamayo A, Casabo J, Escribe L, Covelo B, Capelo J, Lodeiro C (2009) New chemosensors based on thiomacrocycle-containing coumarin-343 fluoroionophor: X-ray structures and previous results on the effect of cation binding on the photophysical properties. Inorg Chem Commun 12:1128–1134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2009.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prasanna S, Nimal GHQ, Thorfinnur G, Allen JMH, Colin PM, Jude TR, Terence ER (1997) Signaling recognition events with fluorescent sensors and switches. Chem Rev 97:1515–1566.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr960386p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Acharya S, Rebery B (2009) Fluorescence spectrometric study of eosin yellow dye-surfactant interactions. Arab J Chem 2:7–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2009.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ding L, Wang S, Liu Y, Cao J, Fang Y (2013) Bispyrene/surfactant assemblies as fluorescent sensor platform: detection and identification of Cu2+ and Co2+ in aqueous solution. J Mater Chem A 1:8866–8875.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta10453b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shihuai W, Ding L, Fan J, Wang Z, Fang Y (2014) Bispyrene/surfactant-assembly-based fluorescent sensor Array for discriminating lanthanide ions in aqueous solution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:16156–16165.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am504208a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao Y, Zhong Z (2006) Detection of Hg2+ in aqueous aolutions with a foldamer-based fluorescent sensor modulated by surfactant micelles. Org Lett 8:4715–4717.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ol061735x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gujar V, Pundge V, Ottoor D (2015) Interaction of antihypertensive drug amiloride with metal ions in micellar medium using fluorescence spectroscopy. J Lumin 161:87–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2014.12.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Subhendu SB, Rajen K, Sangita T (2012) Fluorometric sensing of Cu2+ ion with smart fluorescence light-up probe, triazolylpyrene (TNDMBPy). Tetrahedron Lett 53:5875–5879.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.08.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jamkratoke M, Tumcharern G, Tuntulani T, Tomapatanaget B (2011) A selective spectrofluorometric determination of micromolar level of cyanide in water using naphthoquinone imidazole boronic-based sensors and a surfactant cationic CTAB micellar system. J Fluoresc 21:1179–1187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-010-0796-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jamkratoke M, Ruangpornvisuti V, Tumcharern G, Tuntulani T, Tomapatanaget B (2009) A-D-A sensors based on naphtho-imidazoledione and boronic acid as turn-on cyanide probes in water. J Org Chem 74:3919–3922.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jo900170r CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tian H, Qian J, Bai H, Sun Q, Zhang L, Zhang W (2013) Micelle-induced multiple performance improvement of fluorescent probes for H2S detection. Anal Chim Acta 768:136–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2013.01.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cao J, Ding L, Zhang Y, Wang S, Fang Y (2016) A ternary sensor system based on pyrene derivative-SDS assemblies-Cu2+ displaying dual responsive signals for fast detection of arginine and lysine in aqueous solution. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 314:66–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.08.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gujar V, Ottoor D (2017) Medium dependent dual turn on/turn off fluorescence sensing of Cu2+ ions using AMI/SDS assemblies. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 173:666–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2016.10.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berton M, Mancin F, Stocchero G, Tecilla P (2001) Self- assembling in surfactant aggregates: an alternative way to the realization of fluorescence chemosensors for cu(II) ions. Langmuir 17:7521–7528.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la015502k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fernandez Y, Gramatges A, Amendola V, Foti F, Mangano C, Pallavicini P, Patroni S (2004) Using micelles for a new approach to fluorescent sensors for metal cations. Chem Commun:1650–1651.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b404543b
  19. 19.
    Brugnara C (2003) Iron deficiency and erythropoiesis: new diagnostic approaches. Clin Chem 49:1573–1578.  https://doi.org/10.1373/49.10.1573 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beutler E, Felitti V, Gelbart T, Ho N (2001) Genetics of iron storage and hemochromatosis. Drug Metab Dispos 29:495–499 http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/content/46/8 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xiang Y, Tong A (2006) A new rhodamine-based chemosensor exhibiting selective Fe III-amplified fluorescence. Org Lett 8:1549–1552.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ol060001h CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Said N, Burhan K, Muhammad RS, Mehmet AO (2015) Synthesis of novel bisphenol-Biphenanthroline-based molecular tweezers. Mugla J of Sci and Tech 1:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ol070017n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang X, Shiraishi Y, Hirai T (2008) A reversible Hg2+-selective fluorescent chemosensor based on a thioether linked bis-rhodamine. Tetrahedron Lett 49:4178–4183.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA43675F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maksim R, Zhaohua D, James WC (2005) Ratiometric displacement approach to cu(II) sensing by fluorescence. J Am Chem Soc 127:1612–1613.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0431051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ayyappanpillai A, Priya C, Sivaramapanicker S (2005) A Ratiometric fluorescence probe for selective visual sensing of Zn2+. J Am Chem Soc 127:14962–14963.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja054149s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu HM, Parthiban V, Wu SP (2014) A sensitive and selective fluorescent sensor for zinc(II) and its application to living cell imaging. Sensors Actuators B Chem 203:719–725.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.07.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Surewicz WK, Leyko W (1981) Interaction of propranolol with model phospholipids membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 643:387–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(81)90083-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bisby RH, Botchway SW, Crisostomo AG, Karolin J, Parker AW, Schröder L (2010) Interactions of the β-blocker drug, propranolol, with detergents, β-cyclodextrin and living cells studied using fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging. Spectroscopy 24:137–142.  https://doi.org/10.3233/SPE-2010-0415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adina RP, Elena AR, Cosmina AL, Nicoleta LO, Aurelia M, Maria M (2016) Specific interactions within micelle microenvironment in different charged dye/surfactant systems. Arab J Chem 9:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Joshi S, Pant D (2014) Steady state and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy of quinine sulfate dication bound to sodium dodecylsulfate micelles: fluorescent complex formation. J Lumin 145:224–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.07.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gawandi VB, Guha SN, Priyadarsini KI, Mohan H (2001) Steady-state and time-resolved studies on spectral and redox properties of dye–surfactant interactions. J Colloid Interface Sci 242:220–229.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.7753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lakowicz J (2006) Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy. 3rd edn. Springer, pp 17–20 https://www.springer.com/in/book/9780387312781
  33. 33.
    Rohatgi-Mukherjee KK (1997) Fundamentals of photochemistry. New age international (P) limited, Publishers, New Delhi, pp 171–174 https://www.scribd.com/document/246279535 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistrySavitribai Phule Pune UniversityPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations