Journal of Fluorescence

, 19:381 | Cite as

Exploring the Nature of Photo-Damage in Two-photon Excitation by Fluorescence Intensity Modulation

Rapid Communication

Abstract

We investigate the relative photo-damage effects during one- and two-photon excitations and demonstrate that there exist fundamental differences in the damage induced by a high repetition rate laser as compared to that of a CW laser. This difference is evident from the degree of enhanced fluorescence intensity achieved by blanking the excitation with an optical chopper. Such an enhancement in fluorescence intensity provides better signal-to-noise ratio that could have immediate applications in multiphoton imaging of live specimens.

Keywords

Two-photon cross-section Photo-damage Fluorescence enhancement Multiphoton imaging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

AKD thanks CSIR, India for graduate fellowship. The authors thank MCIT and DST, India and Wellcome Trust Foundation, UK for funding. We acknowledge Debjit Roy for his assistance.

References

  1. 1.
    Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW (1990) Science 248:73–76 doi:10.1126/science.2321027 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denk W, Svoboda K (1997) Neuron 18:351–357 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81237-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brakenhoff GJ, Muller M, Ghauharali RI (1996) J Microsc 183:140–144 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2818.1996.870647.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koester HJ, Baur D, Uhl R, Hell SW (1999) Biophys J 77:2226–2236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patterson GH, Piston DW (2000) Biophys J 78:2159–2162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hopt A, Neher E (2001) Biophys J 80:2029–2036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chirico G, Cannone F, Baldini G, Diaspro A (2003) Biophys J 84:588–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Denk W, Piston DW, Webb WW (2006) In: Pawley JB (ed) Handbook of biological confocal microscopy, ch. 28, 3rd edn. pp 535–549Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Konig KU, Tirlapur UK (2002) In: Diaspro A (ed) Confocal and two-photon microscopy: foundations, applications and advances, ch. 9. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 191–205Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tian P, Warren WS (2002) Opt Lett 27:1634–1636 doi:10.1364/OL.27.001634 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diaspro A, Sheppard CJ (2002) In: Diaspro A (ed) Two-photon microscopy: foundations, applications and advances, ch 3. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 39–73Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zimmerman HE, Penn JH, Carpenter CW (1982) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2128–2132 doi:10.1073/pnas.79.6.2128 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valeur B (2002) In: Molecular fluorescence: principles and applications. Willey-VCH, Weinheim, pp 167Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Priyadarshi S, Tech M (2007) Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology KanpurGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whinnery JR (1974) Acc Chem Res 7:225–231 doi:10.1021/ar50079a003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goswami D (2007) In: Larkin SB (ed) Lasers and electro-optics research at the cutting edge, ch. 2. Nova, New York, pp 44–49Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Operator’s Manual: The Coherent Mira Model 900-f Laser, Coherent Laser Group, CA, pp. 2.6.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Lakowicz JR (2006) In: principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, 3rd edn. Springer, New York, pp 607–608Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Du HR, Fuh RA, Li J, Corkan A, Lindsey JS (1998) Photochem Photobiol 68:141–142Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryIndian Institute of Technology KanpurKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations