Advertisement

The Effect of the Shape of the Anode Head on the Nitrogen Soft X-Ray Emission from a Dense Plasma Focus Device: a Numerical Investigation Using the Modified Lee Model Code Accompanied by Experiments

  • Hadi Barati
  • Morteza Habibi
Original Research
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

An alternative way for calculating the magnetic field in the Lee Model Code has been used. The effects of the various anode-tip shapes on the DPF behavior have been studied. The current and impedance calculations have been employed for these investigations. For the conical anode tip, the best pinch current and soft x-ray radiation have been seen in simulations which was in good agreement with the empirical results. The investigations were carried out for the voltages of 11, 12, and 13 kV and the pressure range of 1–6 Torrs. The asymmetry in the discharging current has been investigated through three arbitrarily defined cathode current distribution patterns. The simulations showed that asymmetry in the axial discharge current increased the plasma Impedance and consequently reduced the soft x-ray emission.

Keywords

Dense plasma focus (DPF) Lee model code Plasma inductance Anode shape Current asymmetry 

References

  1. 1.
    M. Krishnan, The dense plasma focus: a versatile dense pinch for diverse applications. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 40(12), 3189–3221 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Abd Al-Halima Mohamed, M.S. Afify, Dynamics of current sheath in a hollow electrode Z-pinch discharge using slug model. Eur. Phys. J. D 71, 57 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Habibi, R. Amrollahi, M. Attaran, Experimental study of current discharge behavior and hard X-ray anisotropy by APF plasma focus device. J. Fusion Energ. 28, 130–134 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Lee, Plasma focus radiative model: review of the lee model code. J. Fusion Energ. 33, 319–335 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Lee, P. Lee, S.H. Saw, R.S. Rawat, Numerical experiments on plasma focus pinch current limitation. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 50, 065012 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.H. Saw, S. Lee, Scaling laws for plasma focus machines from numerical experiments. Energ. Power Eng. 2, 65 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Celik, Spectral measurements of inductively coupled and helicon discharge modes of a laboratory argon plasma source. Spectrochim. Acta Part B 66, 149–155 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Gupta, S.R. Mohanty, R.S. Rawat, M.P. Srivastava, Current sheath dynamics and X-ray emission studies from sequential dense plasma focus device. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 28(4), 1263–1270 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.L. Porter et al., Demonstration of population inversion by resonant photopumping in a neon gas cell irradiated by a sodium Z pinch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 796 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.J. Rocca et al., Demonstration of a discharge pumped table-top soft-X-ray laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2192 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N.V. Filippov, T.I. Filippova, I.V. Khutoretskaia et al., Megajoule scale plasma focus as efficient X-ray source. Phys. Lett. A 211, 168 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.L. Bourgade, C. Cavailler, J. De Mascureau, J.L. Miquel, Pulsed soft x-ray source for laser-plasma diagnostic calibrations. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 2165 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    I.V. Fomenkov, W.N. Partloand, R.M. Ness, Optimization of a dense plasma focus device as a light source for EUV lithography. Proc. SPIE 4688, 634 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.S. Rawat, T. Zhang, C.B.L. Phua et al., Effect of insulator sleeve length on soft X-ray emission from a neon-filled plasma focus device. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 13, 569 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Mahtab, M. Habibi, Nitrogen soft and hard X-ray emissions using different shapes of anodes in a 4 kJ plasma focus device. Plasma Phys. Rep. 40(1), 34–39 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.R. Etaati, R. Amrollahi, M. Habibi, R. Baghdadi, Angular distribution of argon ions and X-ray emissions in the APF plasma focus device. J. Fusion Energ. 30, 121–125 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Habibi, R. Amrollahi, Anisotropic investigation of hard X-ray emission with flat anode tips in APF plasma focus device. J. Fusion Energ. 29, 119–123 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Bhuyan, S.R. Mohanty, N.K. Neog, S. Bujarbarua, R.K. Rout, Comparative study of soft X-ray emission characteristics in a low energy dense plasma focus device. J. Appl. Phys. 95(6), 2975–2981 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Hussain, M. Shafiq, R. Ahmad, A. Waheed, M. Zakaullah, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 14, 61–69 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.D. Baharani, M. Habibi, Kh Mohammadi, Three dimensional angular distributions of X‐rays in a 4 kJ plasma focus device for different anode tips using TLD‐100 dosimeters. Contrib. Plasma Phys. 54(9), 749–755 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D.K. Cheng, Field and Wave Electromagnetics, 2nd edn. (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston, 1983)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Baghdadi, R. Amrollahi, G.R. Etaati, M. Habibi, A. Roomi, Study of the soft and hard X-ray emitted by APF plasma focus device in different pressures. J. Fusion Energ. 29, 503–507 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Energy Engineering and PhysicsAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations