Advertisement

Journal of Fusion Energy

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 597–604 | Cite as

Simulation of a New Plasma Mitigation Method by Transferring Part Poloidal Magnetic Energy in J-TEXT

  • Jun Zhang
  • Ming Zhang
  • Bo RaoEmail author
  • Xiaolong Li
  • Wendi Xu
  • Zhongyong Chen
  • Yuan Pan
  • Kexun Yu
Original Research

Abstract

The magnitude of the damaging effect caused by plasma disruptions increases with the energy dissipated inside the vacuum vessel (VV) during plasma disruptions. To mitigate the disruption damage, a new method aiming at reducing the total energy dissipated inside the VV is proposed. By adding a group of coils on tokamak that are inductively coupled with plasma and conducting these coils during disruption, part of the poloidal magnetic energy can be coupled and be dissipated outside the VV, which leads to a reduction of the energy dissipated inside the VV. This new method is named poloidal magnetic energy transfer (MET) and the coils are named energy transfer coils. This method is firstly proposed and analyzed in J-TEXT. The principle of MET is described and the effect of MET is calculated with a simplified lump-parameter circuit. A 23 % reduction of the magnetic energy dissipated inside the VV can be obtained.

Keywords

Tokamak Plasma disruption Disruption mitigation Magnetic energy transfer J-TEXT 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National ITER Project of China (No. 2013GB113003 and 2015GB111002) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, HUST: cx-15-061.

References

  1. 1.
    T.C. Hender et al., Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions. Nucl. Fusion 47(6), S128–S202 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.M. Hollmann et al., Plasma–surface interactions during tokamak disruptions and rapid shutdowns. J. Nucl. Mater. 415(1), S27–S34 (2011)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Commaux et al., Radiation asymmetries during disruptions on DIII-D caused by massive gas injection. Phys. Plasmas 21, 102510 (2014)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Lehnen et al., Suppression of runaway electrons by resonant magnetic perturbations in TEXTOR disruptions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 25500325 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Zhuang et al., Recent research work on the J-TEXT tokamak. Nucl. Fusion 53, 104014 (2013)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z. Ge et al., Reconstruction of the TEXT-U Tokamak in China. Plasma Sci. Technol 11, 439 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.I. Paley et al., Energy flow during disruptions in JET. J. Nucl. Mater. 337–339, 702–706 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Zhang, et al. The magnetic energy flow during plasma disruptions in J-TEXT. J Fusion Energ. doi: 10.1007/s10894-015-9985-5
  9. 9.
    Y. Zhang et al., Characteristics of current quenches during disruptions in the J-TEXT tokamak. Phys. Scr. 86(2), 025501 (2012)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. Riccardo, P. Barabaschi, M. Sugihara, Characterization of plasma current quench at JET. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 47(1), 117–129 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.P. Gerhardt, J.E. Menard, Characterization of the plasma current quench during disruptions in the National Spherical Torus Experiment. Nucl. Fusion 49, 0250052 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Sugihara et al., Wave form of current quench during disruptions in Tokamaks. J Plasma Fusion Res 79(7), 706–712 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun Zhang
    • 1
  • Ming Zhang
    • 1
  • Bo Rao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiaolong Li
    • 1
  • Wendi Xu
    • 1
  • Zhongyong Chen
    • 1
  • Yuan Pan
    • 1
  • Kexun Yu
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and TechnologyHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations