Advertisement

Journal of Fusion Energy

, Volume 26, Issue 1–2, pp 93–97 | Cite as

Recent Advances in the SPIRIT (Self-organized Plasma with Induction, Reconnection, and Injection Techniques) Concept

  • H. Ji
  • E. Belova
  • S. P. Gerhardt
  • M. Yamada
OriginalPaper

Since its inception at the 1997 Innovative Confinement Concept meeting, the Self-organized Plasma with Induction, Reconnection, and Injection Techniques (SPIRIT) concept has been continuously advanced both theoretically and experimentally. The main features of this concept are: (1) formation of large-flux Field Reversed Configuration (FRC) plasmas by merging two spheromaks with opposite helicities; (2) flexibility to assess FRC stability by varying the plasma shape and kinetic parameter, by using passive stabilizers, and by injecting energetic ions; (3) sustainment of the FRC for a time significantly longer than the energy confinement time using an ohmic transformer and/or neutral beam injection. Experiments carried out in TS-3/4 and SSX and more recently in Magnetic Reconnection Experiment (MRX) have further verified the effectiveness of this formation scheme for large-flux FRCs. An improved understanding of FRC stability over plasma shape and kinetic parameter has been obtained in MRX. New numerical simulations showed that FRC plasmas can be globally stabilized by injecting energetic ions. Many of these aspects of the SPIRIT concept can be further studied in the current MRX device.

Keywords

Magnetic confinement field reversed configuration neutral beam injection 

References

  1. 1.
    Tuszewski M. (1988) Nucl. Fusion 28:2033Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steinhauer L. C. et al., (1996) Fusion Tech. 30:116Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Yamada, H. Ji, and P. Heitzenroeder, Proc. ICC “Innovative Approaches to Fusion Energy,” Pleasanton, Calif. Oct. (1997).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ji H., Yamada M., Plasma J. (1999) Fusion Res. Series 2:195–197Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Yamada, H. Ji, T. A. Carter, S. C. Hsu, R. M. Kulsrud, N. L. Bretz, F. C. Jobes, Y. Ono, M. Katsurai, T. -H. Watanabe, T. Sato, and T. Hayashi, in Fusion Energy 1996. Proc. 16th Int. Conf., Montreal, Canada, 1996. Paper IAEA-CN-64/CP-19.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones I. E., Hugrass W. N. (1981) J. Plasma Phys. 26:441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo H. Y., Hoffman A. L., Brooks R. D., Peter A. M., Pietrzyk Z. A., Tobin S. J., Votroubek G. R. (2002) Phys. Plasmas 9:185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamada M., Ono Y., Hayakawa A., Katsurai M., Perkins F. W. (1990) Phys. Rev. Lett. 65:721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ono Y., Yamada M., Akao T., Tajima T., Matsumoto R. (1996) Phys. Rev. Lett. 76:3328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cothran C. D., Falk A., Fefferman A., Landreman M., Brown M. R., Shaffer M. J. (2003) Phys. Plasmas 10:1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. P. Gerhardt, E. Belova, M. Inomoto, M. Yamada, H. Ji, and Y. Ren, “Improved Stability of Oblate Field-Reversed Configurations through Passive Stabilization and Plasma Shaping,” to be submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. (2006).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tuszewski M., Barnes D. C., Chrien R. E., Cobb J. W., Rej D. J., Siemon R. E., Taggart D. P., Wright B. L. (1991) Phys. Rev. Lett. 66:711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ji H., Yamada M., Kulsrud R., Himura H. (1998) Phys. Plasmas 5:3685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Ishida, H. Momota, and L. C. Steinhauer, Phys. Fluids 31, 3024 (1988); N. Iwasawa, A. Ishida, and L. C. Steinhauer, Phys. Plasmas 8, 1240 (2001).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Belova E. V., Jardin S. C., Ji H., Yamada M., Kulsrud R. (2000) Phys. Plasmas 7:4996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belova E. V., Jardin S. C., Ji H., Yamada M., Kulsrud R. (2001) Phys. Plasmas 8:1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. C. Barnes, Phys. Plasmas 8, 4856 (2001); Phys. Plasmas 9, 560 (2002).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yamada H., Katano T., Ishida A., Steinhauer L. C. (2003) Phys. Plasmas 10:1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ohtani H., Horiuchi R., Sato T. (2003) Phys. Plasmas 10:145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Belova E. V., Davidson R. C., Ji H., Yamada M. (2003) Phys. Plasmas 10:2361CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Belova E. V., Davidson R. C., Ji H., Yamada M. (2004) Phys. Plasma 11:2523CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steinhauer L. C., Ishida A. (1997) Phys. Rev. Lett. 79:3423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Steinhauer L. C., Yamada H., Ishida A. (2001) Phys. Plasmas 8:4053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. V. Belova, R. Davidson, H. Ji, and M. Yamada, “Advances in the Numerical Modeling of Field-Reversed Configurations”, to appear in Phys. Plasmas. (2006).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hammer J. H., Berk H. L. (1982) Nucl. Fusion 22:89Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Yamada, H. Ji, S. Gerhardt, E. Belova, R. Davidson, and D. Mikkelsen, “SPIRIT: A Research Program for Oblate Field Reversed Configuration Formation, Stability and Sustainment Studies”, to be submitted (2006).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hoffman A. L. (1998) Phys. Plasmas 5:979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cohen S. A., Milroy R. D. (2000) Phys. Plasmas 7:2539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Y. Ono, A. Morita, T. Itagaki, and M. Katsurai, in Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1992. Proc. 14th Int. Conf., Würzburg, Germany, 1992, Vol. 2. (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1993), p. 619.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations