Romance and Responsibility in Woody Allen’s “Manhattan”
Reflection on the wrongs done by characters in Woody Allen’s romantic comedy “Manhattan” helps us get clear about the evidence required to judge them responsible and so liable to blame them for those wrongs. On the positive side, what is required is evidence that trust remains a possibility, despite the fact that they wrong, and this in turn requires evidence that the wrongdoer had, but failed to exercise, the capacity to do the right thing when they did that wrong. On the negative side, what is not required is evidence of some explanation of that failure. This counts against a well-known suggestion of Gary Watson’s in “Skepticism about Weakness of Will.”
KeywordsWoody Allen Blame Dean Cocking and Jeanette Kennett Friendship Love Rational capacity Trust Gary Watson
- Allen, Woody. 1982. Four films of Woody Allen: Annie Hall, Interiors, Manhattan, Stardust Memories. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Gershwin, Ira. 1927. He loves and she loves. http://www.songlyrics.com/.
- Gershwin, Ira. 1930. But not for me. http://www.songlyrics.com/.
- Nehamas, Alexander. 2002. A promise of happiness: The place of beauty in a world of art. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 23: 189–231.Google Scholar
- Smith, Michael. 2003. Rational Capacities. In Weakness of will and varieties of practical irrationality, ed. Sarah Stroud, and Christine Tappolet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, Michael. forthcoming. The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Love’s reasons. In Love, reason, and morality , ed. Esther Kroeker, and Katrien Schaubroeck. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wallace, R. Jay. 1994. Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar