The Journal of Ethics

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 275–304 | Cite as

Abortion and Ownership

Article

Abstract

I explore two thought-experiments in Judith Jarvis Thomson’s important article, “A Defense of Abortion”: the violinist example and the people-seeds example. I argue (contra Thomson) that you have a moral duty not to unplug yourself from the violinist and also a moral duty not to destroy a people-seed that has landed in your sofa. Nevertheless, I also argue that there are crucial differences between the thought-experiments and the contexts of pregnancy due to rape or to contraceptive failure. In virtue of these differences, it would not follow from my conclusions about the violinist and people-seeds cases that abortion would not be permissible in a case of rape or in a case of voluntary intercourse with contraceptive failure.

Keywords

Abortion Cabin Case Judith Jarvis Thomson Person Rape Voluntary intercourse Violinist example People-seeds example 

References

  1. Boonin, D. 2003. A defense of abortion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boonin, D. 2013. Comments on fischer. The Rocky Mountain Ethics Congress, Boulder, CO. (unpublished).Google Scholar
  3. Feinberg, J. 1978. Voluntary euthanasia and the inalienable right to life. Philosophy & Public Affairs 7: 93–123.Google Scholar
  4. Fischer, J.M. 1991. Abortion and self-determination. Journal of Social Philosophy 22: 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer, J.M. 2003. Abortion, autonomy, and control of one’s body. Social Philosophy and Policy 2: 286–306; reprinted in Paul, E., Miller, F., and Paul, J. (eds.), 2003: 286–306 and also in Schenker, J.G. (ed.), 2010: 101–12.Google Scholar
  6. Frey, R.G., and C.H. Wellman (eds.). 2003. A companion to applied ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Hursthouse, R. 1987. Beginning lives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Little, M.O. 2003. Abortion. In Frey and Wellman (eds.) 2003: 313–325.Google Scholar
  9. Parent, W. (ed.). 1986. Rights, restitution, and risk. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Paul, E., F. Miller, and J. Paul (eds.). 2003. Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Schenker, J.G. (ed.). 2010. Ethical dilemmas in perinatal medicine. New Delhi: Paypee Brothers Medical Publishers. Google Scholar
  12. Singer, P. 1972. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1: 229–243.Google Scholar
  13. Singer, P. 2009. The life you can save: How to do your part to end world poverty. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  14. Thomson, J.J. 1972. A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 47–66; reprinted in Parent, ed. 1986: 1–19.Google Scholar
  15. Thomson, J.J. 1980. Rights and compensation. Nous 14: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of California, RiversideRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations