Asymmetries in Benefiting, Harming and Creating
- 561 Downloads
It is often said that while we have a strong reason not to create someone who will be badly off, we have no strong reason for creating someone who will be well off. In this paper I argue that this asymmetry is incompatible with a plausible principle of independence of irrelevant alternatives, and that a more general asymmetry between harming and benefiting is difficult to defend. I then argue that, contrary to what many have claimed, it is possible to harm or benefit someone by bringing her into existence.
KeywordsAsymmetry Creation Existence Harm Independence of irrelevant alternatives Well-being
- Arrhenius, G. 2006. The moral status of potential people. Manuscript.Google Scholar
- Arrhenius, G. 2009. Can the person affecting restriction solve the problems in population ethics? In Harming future persons: Ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem, ed. M. Roberts, and D. Wasserman, 291–316. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Arrhenius, G. 2010. Population ethics: The challenge of future generations. Manuscript.Google Scholar
- Arrhenius, G., and K. Bykvist. 1995. Future generations and interpersonal compensations: Moral aspects of energy use. Manuscript.Google Scholar
- Arrhenius, G., and W. Rabinowicz. 2010. Better to be than not to be? In The benefit of broad horizons: Intellectual and institutional preconditions for a global social science (Festschrift for Björn Wittrock on the occasion of his 65th birthday), ed. H. Joas, and B. Klein, 399–414. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
- Bradley, B. 2010. Benatar and the logic of betterness. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, www.jesp.org.
- Bradley, B. (forthcoming). Doing away with harm. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar
- Broome, J. 1991. Weighing goods. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Feldman, F. 1992. Confrontations with the reaper. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. 1966. The open society and its enemies: The spell of Plato, vol. 1, 5th ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. 2002. Rationality and freedom. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar