Still Better Never to Have Been: A Reply to (More of) My Critics
- First Online:
- 955 Downloads
In Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence, I argued that coming into existence is always a harm and that procreation is wrong. In this paper, I respond to those of my critics to whom I have not previously responded. More specifically, I engage the objections of Tim Bayne, Ben Bradley, Campbell Brown, David DeGrazia, Elizabeth Harman, Chris Kaposy, Joseph Packer and Saul Smilansky.
KeywordsAnti-natalism Betterness Procreation Quality of life Suicide Value
- Ariely, D. 2009. Predictably irrational. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Belshaw, C. 2007. Review of Benatar (2006). Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=9983.
- Benatar, D. 2010. The limits of reproductive freedom. In Procreation and parenthood: The ethics of bearing and rearing children, ed. David Archard, and David Benatar, 80–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Benatar, D. forthcoming. Suicide: A qualified defence. In The ethics and metaphysics of death: New essays, ed. J.S. Taylor. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bradley, B. 2010. Benatar and the logic of betterness. Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy:1–5.Google Scholar
- Chisholm, R., and E. Sosa. 1966. On the logic of “intrinsically better”. American Philosophical Quarterly 3: 244–249.Google Scholar
- Cowley, C. 2011. Moral philosophy and the “real world”. Analytical Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 31: 21–30.Google Scholar
- Notes & comments. 2008 The New Criterion 26(5):1–2.Google Scholar
- von Wright, G.H. 1963. The logic of preference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations, transl. G.E.M. Anscombe, 103e. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, M.J. 2010. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic value. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, revised 17 December 2010, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic/. Last accessed 7 June 2011.