The Journal of Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 387–403

Health, Luck and Moral Fallacies of the Second Best

Article

Abstract

Individuals who become ill as a result of personal lifestyle choices often shift the monetary costs of their healthcare needs to the taxpaying public or to fellow members of a private insurance pool. Some argue that policies permitting such cost shifting are unfair. Arguments for this view may seem to draw support from luck egalitarian accounts of distributive justice. This essay argues that the luck egalitarian framework provides no such support. To allocate healthcare costs on the basis of personal responsibility would arbitrarily and publicly burden socially detectable risk-takers while undetectable risk-takers continue to get a free ride. That problem is unavoidable even on the assumption that distributive institutions outside the healthcare sector are fully just. In actual, farfrom-just societies, imposing personal liability for the costs of voluntary risk taking would be wrong for an additional reason. Doing so would tend to magnify existing distributive injustices. These conclusions draw attention to two common ‘moral fallacies of the second best’ that can arise when applying ideal normative theory to matters of institutional design and in real-world policy contexts.

Keywords

Egalitarianism Health Healthcare Luck Luck egalitaianism Personal responsibility Responsibility 

References

  1. Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 109(2): 283–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arneson, Richard. 1989. Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56: 159–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arneson, Richard. 1990. Liberalism, distributive subjectivism and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs 19(2): 158–194.Google Scholar
  4. Arneson, Richard. 1997. Equality and equality of opportunity for welfare: Postscript (1995). In Equality: Selected readings, ed. Louis, P. Pojman, and Robert Westmoreland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arneson, Richard. 2000. Luck egalitarianism and prioritarianism. Ethics 110(2) (January, 2000).Google Scholar
  6. Arneson, Richard. 2002. Review of Sovereign Virtue, by Ronald Dworkin. Ethics 112: 367–371.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, Gene., and Amy C. Brodkey. 2006. Personal responsibility and physician responsibility—West Virginia’s medicaid plan. New England Journal of Medicine; 756–758.Google Scholar
  8. Black, D., et al. 1988. Inequalities in health: The Black report; the health divide. London: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  9. Blanden, Jo., Paul Gregg., and Stephen Machini. 2005. Intergenerational mobility in Europe and North America. Centre for Economic Performance: April, 2005. Available at http://www2.lse.ac.uk/ERD/pressAndInformationOffice/newsAndEvents/archives/2005/LSE_SuttonTrust_report.aspx. Accessed July 20, 2009.
  10. Brandt, Allan M. 1997. Behavior, disease, and health in the twentieth century United States: The moral valence of individual risk. In Morality and health, eds. Allan M. Brandt, and Paul Rozin, 53–77. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Brennan, Geoffrey. 1993. The contribution of economics. In A companion to political theory, eds. Robert E. Goodin, and Philip Pettit. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Cappelen, O.W., and O.F. Norheim. 2005. Responsibility in healthcare: A liberal egalitarian approach. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 476–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, G.A. 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99: 906–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coram, Bruce Talbot. 1996. Second best theories and the implications for institutional design. In The theory of institutional design, ed. Robert E. Goodin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Crawford, Robert. 1979. You are dangerous to your health: The ideology and politics of victim blaming. International Journal of Health Services 7: 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davey-Smith, G., M.J. Shipley, and G. Rose. 1990. Magnitude and causes of socioeconomic differentials in mortality: Further evidence from the whitehall study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 44: 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dworkin, Ronald. 2002. Sovereign virtue revisited. Ethics 113(1): 106–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign virtue. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Elster, Jon. 1993. The possibility of rational politics. In Political theory today, ed. David Held. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Elster, Jon. 1997. The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In Contemporary political philosophy: An anthology, eds. Robert E. Goodin, and Philip Pettit. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Finkelstein, Eric A., Justin G. Trogdon, Joel W. Cohen, and William Dietz. 2009. Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: Payer-and service-specific estimates. Health Affairs 28(5): 822–831.Google Scholar
  22. Goodin, Robert E. 1995. Political ideals and political practice. British Journal of Political Science 25(1): 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keister, Lisa A. 2005. Getting rich: America’s new rich and how they got that way. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Knowles, J.H. 1997. The responsibility of the individual. In Doing better and feeling worse: Health in the United States, ed. J.H. Knowles, 57–80. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Lantz, P.M., et al. 1998. Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: Results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. JAMA 279: 1703–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leichter, Howard M. 2003. Evil habits and personal choices: Assigning responsibility for health in the 20th century. The Milbank Quarterly 81(4): 603–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lipsey, R.G., and Kelvin Lancaster. 1956. The general theory of the second best. Review of Economic Studies 24: 11–32.Google Scholar
  28. Marmot, M., M. Shipley, and G. Rose. 1984. Inequalities in death—specific explanations of a general pattern?’ Lancet 323(8384): 1003-61003-6.Google Scholar
  29. Meulen, Ruud Ter. 2008. Increasing individual responsibility in dutch healthcare: Is solidarity losing ground? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33: 262–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Omran, A.R. 1971. The epidemiologic transition: A theory of the epidemiology of population change. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 45(No. 4, Pt. 1): 509–538.Google Scholar
  31. Rakowski, Eric. 1991. Equal justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Reiser, Stanley J. 1985. Responsibility for personal health: A historical perspective. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10(1): 7–17.Google Scholar
  33. Roemer, John E. 1993. A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philosophy & Public Affairs 22: 146–166.Google Scholar
  34. Roemer, John E. 1998. Equality of opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Scheffler, Samuel. 2003. What is egalitarianism. Philosophy & Public Affairs 31(1): 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmidt, Harald. 2007. Personal responsibility for health—developments under the German healthcare reform 2007. European Journal of Health Law 14: 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Segall, Shlomi. 2007. In solidarity with the imprudent: A defence of luck-egalitarianism. Social Theory & Practice 33(2): 177–198.Google Scholar
  38. Segall, Shlomi. 2010. Health, luck, and justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sen, A.K. 1992. Equality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Steinbrook, Robert. 2006. Imposing personal responsibility for health. New England Journal of Medicine 753–756. (August 24, 2006).Google Scholar
  41. Sturm, R. 2002. The effects of obesity, smoking, and problem drinking on chronic medical problems and healthcare costs. Health Affairs 21(2): 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sturm, R., and K.B. Wells. 2001. Does obesity contribute as much to morbidity as poverty or smoking? Public Health 115: 229–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Veatch, Robert M. 1980. Voluntary risks to health. JAMA 243(1): 50–55.Google Scholar
  44. Wall Street Journal Online/Harris Interactive Health-Care Poll, July 19 2006.Google Scholar
  45. West Virginia, State of, “Alternative Benefits State Plan Amendment,” available at http://www.wvdhhr.org/bms/oAdministration/bms_admin_WV_SPA06-02_20060503.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2009.
  46. Wikler, Daniel. 2004. Personal and social responsibility for health. In Public health, ethics, equity, ed. Sudhir Anand, Fabienne Peter, and Amartya Sen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wikler, Daniel. 2007. Who should be blamed for being sick? In Public health ethics: Theory, policy and practice, eds. Bayer et al., 92–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wolff, Jonathan, and Avner de Shalit. 2008. Disadvantage Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Connecticut State UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations