Advertisement

Income inequality and well-being in the U.S.: evidence of geographic-scale- and measure-dependence

  • John Ifcher
  • Homa Zarghamee
  • Carol Graham
Article

Abstract

U.S. income inequality has risen dramatically in recent decades. Researchers consistently find that greater income inequality measured at the state or national level is associated with diminished subjective well-being (SWB) in the U.S. We conduct the first multi-scale analysis (i.e., at the ZIP-code, MSA, and state levels) of the inequality-SWB relationship using SWB data from the U.S. Gallup Healthways Well-Being Index and income inequality data from the American Community Survey. We use the rich set of SWB measures afforded by the dataset (evaluative, positive hedonic, and negative hedonic) to examine the consistency of the relationship. We find that the relationship is both scale-dependent and measure-dependent: income inequality is SWB-diminishing in large regions for all measures, SWB-diminishing in small regions for negative hedonic measures, and SWB-improving in small regions for evaluative and positive hedonic measures. Lastly, we find that taking all regions together, the net relationship between income inequality and SWB is negative for all hedonic measures.

Keywords

Subjective well-being Income inequality Happiness Distribution of income Health Scale-dependence Measure-dependence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R.: Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? J. Public Econ. 88, 2009–2042 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashok, V., Kuziemko, I., Washington, E.: Support for redistribution in an age of rising inequality: New stylized facts and some tentative explanations. Brookings Pap. Econ Act (2015)Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–263 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg, M., Veenhoven, R.: Income inequality and happiness in 119 nations. In: Greve, B. (ed.) Happiness and social policy in Europe, pp. 174–194. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2010)Google Scholar
  5. Brodeur, A., Fléche, S.: Neighbors’ income, public goods, and well-being. Rev. Income Wealth.  https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12367 (2018)
  6. Brush, J.: Does income inequality lead to more crime? A comparison of cross-sectional and time-series analyses of United States counties. Econ. Letters 96, 264–268 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J.V.: Inequality and relative ability beliefs. Econ. J. 126, 907–948 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choe, J.: Income inequality and crime in the United States. Econ. Letters 101, 31–33 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, A.E.: Inequality-aversion and income mobility: A direct test. Mimeo DELTA, Paris (2003)Google Scholar
  10. Clark, A.E., Kristensen, N., Westergard-Neilsen, N.: Economic satisfaction and income rank in small neighbourhoods. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 7, 519–527 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, A.E., D’Ambrosio, C.: Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence. In: Atkinson, A., Bourguignon, F (eds.) Handbook of income distribution, vol. 2A, pp. 1147–1208. Elsevier, Dordrecht (2015)Google Scholar
  12. Costa, D.L., Kahn, M.E.: Understanding the American decline in social capital, 1952–1998. Kyklos 56, 17–46 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deaton, A., Stone, A.A.: Two happiness puzzles. Amer. Econ. Rev. 103, 591–597 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B.D.: Income and poverty in the United States: 2014. In: U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Reports, pp. 60–252. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. (2015)Google Scholar
  15. Delhey, J., Dragolov, G.: Why inequality makes Europeans less happy: The role of distrust, status anxiety, and perceived conflict. Europ. Sociological Rev. 30, 151–165 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Diener, M., Diener, C.: Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 851–864 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., Smith, H.L.: Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychol. Bull. 125, 276–302 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., Helliwell, J.: Well-Being for public policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R.: Some uses of happiness data in economics. J. Econ. Perspect. 20, 25–46 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fahey, T., Smyth, E.: The link between subjective well-being and objective conditions in European societies. In: Arts, W.A., Halman, L. (eds.) European values at the turn of the millennium, pp. 57–80. Brill, Leiden (2004)Google Scholar
  21. Frey, B.S., Stutzer, A.: What can economists learn from happiness research. J. Econ. Lit. 40, 402–435 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, C.: The economics of happiness. World Econ. 6, 41–55 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. Graham, C., Felton, A.: Inequality and happiness: Insights from Latin America. J. Econ. Inequality 4, 107–122 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagerty, M.R.: Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 764–771 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haller, M., Hadler, M.: How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Soc. Indic. Res. 75, 169–216 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Headey, B.W., Wooden, M.: The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and ill-being. Econ. Rec. 80, S24–S33 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Helliwell, J., Huang, H.: How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. Brit. J. Polit. Sci. 38, 595–619 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Helliwell, J.F., Barrington-Leigh, C.P., Harris, A., Huang, H.: International evidence on the social context of well-being. In: Diener, E., Helliwell, J. F., Kahneman, D. (eds.) International differences in well-being. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  29. Hirschman, A.O., Rothschild, M.: The changing tolerance for income inequality economic development. Quart. J. Econ. 87, 544–566 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hsieh, C.-C., Pugh, M.D.: Poverty, income inequality, and violent crime: A meta-analysis of recent aggregate data studies. Crim. Just. Rev. 18, 182–202 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ifcher, J., Zarghamee, H., Graham, C.: Local neighbors as positives, regional neighbors as negatives: Competing channels in the relationship between others’ income, health, and happiness. J. Health Econ. 57, 263–276 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahneman, D., Deaton, A.: High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. P. Nat. Acad. Sci. 107, 16489–16493 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B.P., Prothrow-Stith, D.: Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. Amer. J. Public Health 87, 1491–1498 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelly, M.: Inequality and crime. Rev. Econ. Statist. 82, 530–539 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kingdon, G.G., Knight, J.: Community, comparisons and subjective well-being in a divided society. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 64, 69–90 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knight, J., Song, L., Gunatilaka, R.: Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China. China Econ. Rev. 20, 635–649 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A.: The reliability of subjective well-being measures. J. Public Econ. 92, 1833–1845 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Layte, R.: The association between income inequality and mental health: Testing status anxiety, social capital, and neo-materialist explanations. Europ. Sociological Rev. 28, 498–511 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Donnell, G.: Using well-being as a guide to public policy. In: Helliwell, J., Layard, R., Sachs, J. (eds.) World Happiness Report 2013. UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  40. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S, Diener, E.: Income inequality and happiness. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1095–1100 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ott, J.: Level and inequality of happiness in nations: Does greater happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality in happiness. J. Happiness Stud. 6, 397–420 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piketty, T.: Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Piketty, T., Saez, E.: Inequality in the long run. Sci. 344, 838–843 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Savolainen, J.: Inequality, welfare state, and homocide: Further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminol. 38, 1021–1042 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schneider, S.M.: Income inequality and subjective wellbeing: Trends, challenges, and research directions. J. Happiness Stud. 17, 1719–1739 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwarze, J., Harpfer, M.: Are people inequality averse, and do they prefer redistribution by the state? Evidence from German longitudinal data on life satisfaction. J. Socio-Econ. 36, 233–249 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schyns, P.: Wealth of nations, individual income and life satisfaction in 42 countries: A multilevel approach. Soc. Indic. Res. 60, 5–40 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Senik, C.: Income distribution and subjective happiness: A survey. OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Papers, 96 (2009)Google Scholar
  49. Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.-P.: Mis-measuring our lives. The New Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  50. Stone, A., Mackie, C.: Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. The National Academies Press, Washington D.C (2013)Google Scholar
  51. Thurow, L.C.: The income distribution as a pure public good. Quart. J. Econ. 85, 327–336 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tomes, N.: Income distribution, happiness and satisfaction: A direct test of the interdependent preferences model. J. Econ. Psychol. 7, 425–446 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Praag, B., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A.: Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Veenhoven, R.: The cross-national pattern of happiness of happiness. Soc. Indic. Res. 34, 33–36 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Santa Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA
  2. 2.Barnard CollegeNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Brookings InstitutionWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations