Advertisement

The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 527–552 | Cite as

Gender inequalities in pensions: different components similar levels of dispersion

  • Carole BonnetEmail author
  • Dominique Meurs
  • Benoît Rapoport
Article

Abstract

While the average gender gap in pensions is quite well documented, gender differences in the distribution of pensions have rarely been explored. We show in this paper that pension dispersion is very similar for men and women within the French pension system of a given sector (public or private). Gender differences are less marked among retired civil servants than among former private sector employees. However, the determinants of these inequalities are not the same for men and women. Using a regression-based decomposition of the Gini coefficient, we find that pension dispersion is mostly due to dispersion of the reference wage for all retirees but gender differences exist. For women, in particular, pension dispersion is also due to the dispersion in contribution periods. We also decompose the Gini coefficient by source of pension to measure the impact of institutional rules (minimum pensions, survivor’s pension) on the extent of pension inequality. Unexpectedly, we find that the impact of minimum pensions is limited, although slightly larger for civil servants than for private-sector employees. Survivor’s pension schemes, on the other hand, contribute positively to pension dispersion among retired women.

Keywords

Decomposition Gender gap Gini coefficient Pension Private and Public sector 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support from Unsa Education along with IRES is gratefully acknowledged. We thank the participants at the 2014 “Question Retraite Solidarité” workshop in Paris and at the 2015 ECINEQ meeting in Luxembourg for their comments and suggestions. We also thank two anonymous referees for their helpful remarks.

References

  1. Bardasi, E., Jenkins, S.: The Gender Gap in Private Pensions. Bull. Econ. Res. 62, 343–363 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Betti, G., Bettio, F., Georgiadis, T., Tinios, P.: Unequal Ageing in Europe. Women’s Independence and Pensions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonnet, C., Hourriez, J. M.: Gender equality in pension: what role for rights accrued as a spouse or a parent?. Population-E 67(1), 123–146 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnet, C., Meurs, D., Rapoport, B.: Inégalités de retraite entre les hommes et les femmes dans le privé et le public : une analyse des distributions. Revue de l’IRES 87 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. Bonnet, C., Meurs, D., Rapoport, B.: Gender Inequalities in Pensions: are Determinants the Same in the Private and Public sectors?. Economix Working paper n08 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. Bouchet-Valat, M.: Les évolutions de l’homogamie de diplôme, de classe et d’origine sociales en France (1969-2011) : ouverture d’ensemble, repli des élites. Rev. Fr. Sociol. 55(3), 459–505 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chantreuil, F., Trannoy, A.: Inequality Decomposition Values: the trade-off between marginality and consistency. THEMA Working Papers 99(24), Université de Cergy-Pontoise (1999)Google Scholar
  8. Chantreuil, F., Trannoy, A.: Inequality Decomposition Values. Ann. Econ. Stat. 101/102, 13–36 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coudin, E., Marc, B., Pora, P., Wilner, L.: La baisse des inégalités de revenu salarial marque une pause pendant la crise. Insee, France - Portrait social (2014)Google Scholar
  10. COR/DGAFP: Taux de prime et indice de fin de carrière dans la fonction publique de l’Etat. Working paper (2009)Google Scholar
  11. Cowell, F., Fiorio, C.: Inequality decompositions—a reconciliation. J. Econ. Inequal. 9, 509–528 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drees: Les Comptes de la protection sociale en 2008 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. Drees: Les retraites et les retraités (2013)Google Scholar
  14. Even, W. E., MacPherson, D.: Gender differences in pensions. J. Human Resour. 29, 555–587 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fields, G. S.: Accounting for income inequality and its change: a new method with application to distribution of earnings in the United States. Res. Labor Econ. 22, 1–38 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ginn, J, Street, D, Arber, S.: Women, Work, and Pensions: International Issues and Prospects. Open University Press, Philadelphia (2001)Google Scholar
  17. Jefferson, T.: Women and Retirement Pensions: A Research Review. Fem. Econ. 15(4), 115–145 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, R.: The Gender Gap in Pension Wealth: Is Women’s Progress in the Labor Market Equalizing Retirement Benefits?. Urban Institute Brief Series 1 (1999)Google Scholar
  19. Lerman, R., Yitzhaki, S.: Income Inequality Effects by Income. Rev. Econ. Stat. 67(1), 151–56 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levine, J., Mitchell, O., Phillips, J.: Worklife Determinants of Retirement Income Differentials Between Men and Women. NBER Working Paper, pp. 7243 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. Marin, B., Zólyomi, E. (eds.): Women’s Work and Pensions: What is Good, What is Best? Designing Gender-Sensitive Arrangements. Ashgate, Farnham (2010)Google Scholar
  22. OECD: Closing the Gender Gap Act Now: Act Now (2012)Google Scholar
  23. Ponthieux, S., Meurs, D.: Gender Inequality. In: Atkinson A., Bourguignon, F. (eds.) Handbook on Income Distribution, pp 941–1146. Elsevier (2015)Google Scholar
  24. Pyatt, G., Chen, C., Fei, J.: The Distribution of Income by Factor Components. Q. J. Econ. 95(3), 451–473 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shorrocks, A. F.: Inequality decomposition by factor components. Econometrica 50(1), 193–211 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shorrocks, A. F.: Decomposition Procedures for Distributional Analysis: A Unified Framework Based on the Shapley Value. mimeo, Department of Economics University of Essex (1999)Google Scholar
  27. Stark, O, Taylor, J. E., Yitzhaki, S.: Remittances and Inequality. Econ. J. 96, 722–740 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vanderschelden, M.: Homogamie socioprofessionnelle et ressemblance en termes de niveau d’études : constat et évolution au fil des cohortes d’unions. Écon. Stat. 398–399, 33–58 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. Yitzhaki, S., Schechtman, E.: The Gini Methodology: A Primer on a Statistical Methodology. Springer Series in Statistics. 272 Springer Verlag, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut National d’Etudes Démographiques (INED)ParisFrance
  2. 2.University Paris Ouest Nanterre, EconomixNanterreFrance
  3. 3.University Paris 1 - Panthéon Sorbonne, Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne UMR CNRS, Maison des Sciences EconomiquesParis Cedex 13France

Personalised recommendations