Vulnerability to poverty revisited: Flexible modeling and better predictive performance
This paper analyzes several modifications to improve a simple measure of vulnerability as expected poverty. Firstly, in order to model income, we apply distributional regression relating potentially each parameter of the conditional income distribution to the covariates. Secondly, we determine the vulnerability cutoff endogenously instead of defining a household as vulnerable if its probability of being poor in the next period is larger than 0.5. For this purpose, we employ the receiver operating characteristic curve that is able to consider prerequisites according to a particular targeting mechanism. Using long-term panel data from Germany, we build both mean and distributional regression models with the established 0.5 probability cutoff and our vulnerability cutoff. We find that our new cutoff considerably increases predictive performance. Placing the income regression model into the distributional regression framework does not improve predictions further but has the advantage of a coherent model where parameters are estimated simultaneously replacing the original three step estimation approach.
KeywordsVulnerability to poverty Distributional regression Generalized additive model for location Scale and shape Receiver operating characteristic curve
We thank two anonymous referees and Stephen Jenkins for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. We are grateful for funding from the Ministry of Science and Culture (Lower Saxony).
- Bergolo, M., Cruces, G., Ham, A.: Assessing the predictive power of vulnerability measures: Evidence from panel data for Argentina and Chile. J. Income Distrib. 21(1), 28–64 (2012)Google Scholar
- Chaudhuri, S.: Assessing vulnerability to poverty: concepts empirical methods and illustrative examples. Columbia University, Mimeo (2003)Google Scholar
- Chaudhuri, S., Jalan, J., Suryahadi, A.: Assessing household vulnerability to poverty from cross-sectional data: A methodology and estimates from Indonesia. Discussion Paper Series 0102-52 Department of Economics. Columbia University, New York (2002)Google Scholar
- Egan, J.P.: Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis. Academic Press Series in Cognition and Perception Academic Press. NY, New York (1975)Google Scholar
- Gaiha, R., Imai, K.: Measuring vulnerability and poverty: Estimates for rural India. Research Paper 2008/040 UNU-WIDER. Helsinki, Finland (2008)Google Scholar
- Hoddinott, J., Quisumbing, A.: Methods for microeconometric risk and vulnerability assessments. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series 0324 The World Bank. DC, Washington (2003)Google Scholar
- Klasen, S., Lange, S.: How narrowly should anti-poverty programs be targeted? Simulation evidence from Bolivia and Indonesia. Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth - Discussion Papers 213, Courant Research Centre PEG (2016)Google Scholar
- Landau, K.: Messung der Vulnerabilität der Armut: Eine statistische Analyse mit deutschen Paneldaten Dissertation. Universität Göttingen, Göttingen (2012)Google Scholar
- Ligon, E., Schechter, L.: Evaluating different approaches to estimating vulnerability. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series 0410 The World Bank. DC, Washington (2004)Google Scholar
- McCarthy, N., Brubaker, J., De La Fuente, A.: Vulnerability to poverty in rural Malawi. Policy Research Working Paper WPS7769 The World Bank. DC, Washington (2016)Google Scholar
- McDonald, J.B., Ransom, M.: The Generalized Beta Distribution as a Model for the Distribution of Income: Estimation of Related Measures of Inequality. In: Chotikapanich, D. (ed.) Modeling Income Distributions and Lorenz Curves, Economic Studies in Equality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being, vol. 5, pp 147–166. Springer, New York (2008)Google Scholar
- Pritchett, L., Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S.: Quantifying vulnerability to poverty: A proposed measure, applied to Indonesia. Policy Research Working Paper WPS2437 The World Bank. DC, Washington (2000)Google Scholar
- Sohn, A., Klein, N., Kneib, T.: A Semiparametric Analysis of Conditional Income Distributions. Schmollers Jahrbuch 135, Proceedings of the 11th International Socio-Economic Panel User Conference (SOEP 2014) (2015)Google Scholar
- Stasinopoulos, D.M., Rigby, R.A.: Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J. Stat. Softw. 23(7) (2007)Google Scholar
- Stauder, J., Hüning, W.: Die Messung von Äquivalenzeinkommen und Armutsquoten auf der Basis des Mikrozensus. Statistische Analysen und Studien NRW 13 (2004)Google Scholar
- Thi Nguyen, K.A., Jolly, C.M., Bui, C.T.P.N., Le, T.H.T.: Climate change, rural household food consumption and vulnerability: The case of Ben Tre province in Vietnam. Agric. Econ. Rev. 16(2), 95–109 (2015)Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.