Putting measures of individual well-being to use for ex-ante policy evaluation
Most studies using microsimulation techniques have considered the effect of potential reforms on the income distribution. However, it has become increasingly recognized, both at the academic and political level, that focusing purely on income provides a limited picture of social progress. We illustrate how ex-ante policy evaluation can be performed in terms of richer concepts of individual well-being, such as subjective life satisfaction and equivalent incomes. Our analysis makes use of EUROMOD, the EU-wide tax-benefit microsimulation model, along with 2013 EU-SILC data for Sweden, which for the first time provides information on life satisfaction. Our results show that the effect of potential reforms varies widely depending on the well-being concept used in the evaluation. We discuss the normative questions that are raised by this finding.
KeywordsDisposable income Satisfaction Equivalent income Microsimulation
This research was supported by the NORFACE ERA-NET (New Opportunities for Research Funding Agency Co-operation in Europe Network) Welfare State Futures Program, Grant Number 462-14-010. The results presented here are based on EUROMOD version G2.35. EUROMOD is maintained, developed and managed by the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) at the University of Essex, in collaboration with national teams from the EU member states. We are indebted to the many people who have contributed to the development of EUROMOD. The process of extending and updating EUROMOD is financially supported by the European Union Program for Employment and Social Innovation ‘Easi’ (2014-2020). We make use of microdata from the EU Statistics on Incomes and Living Conditions (EU - SILC) made available by Eurostat (59 /2013 - EU - SILC - LFS). The results and their interpretation are the authors’ responsibility. We thank the editor and an anonymous referee for their useful comments.
- Aaberge, R., Brandolini, A.: Multidimensional poverty and inequality. In: Atkinson, A., Bourguignon, F. (eds.). Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 2A, pp. 141–216. Elsevier, New York (2015)Google Scholar
- Atkinson, A.: An enlarged role for tax-benefit models. In: Lelkes, O., Sutherland, H. (eds.) Tax and Benefit Policies in the Enlarged Europe: Assessing the Impact withMicrosimulationModels, pp. 3346. Vienna, Ashgate (2009)Google Scholar
- Bruno, M.-A., Bernheim, J., Ledoux, D., Pellas, F., Demertzi, A., Laureys, S.: A survey on self-assessed well-being in a cohort of chronic locked-in syndrome patients: happy majority, miserable minority. British Medical Journal Open (2011). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2010-000039
- Decancq, K., Fleurbaey, M., Schokkaert, E.: Inequality, income and well-being. In: Atkinson, A., Bourguignon, F. (eds.). Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 2A, pp. 67–140. Elsevier, New York (2015a)Google Scholar
- Decancq, K., Schokkaert, E., Zuluaga, B.: Implementing the capability approach with respect for individual valuations: an illustration with Colombian data. Department of Economics, KU Leuven: DPS 2016.09 (2016)Google Scholar
- Layard, R.: Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Allan Lane, London (2005)Google Scholar
- Schokkaert, E., Van de Voorde, C., Dormont, B., Fleurbaey, M., Luchini, S., Samson, A.-L., Thébaut, C.: Equity in health and equivalent incomes. In: Rosa Dias, P., O’Donnell, O. (eds.) Health and Inequality (Research on Economic Inequality, Volume 21), pp. 131–56, Bingley, Emerald (2013)Google Scholar
- Sen, A.: Commodities and Capabilities. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1985)Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.-P.: Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris (2009)Google Scholar
- Sutherland, H., Figari, F.: EUROMOD: The European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model. Int. J. Microsimul. 6, 4–26 (2013)Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.