Advertisement

The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 227–248 | Cite as

Toward better global poverty measures

Article

Abstract

While much progress has been made over the last 25 years in measuring global poverty, there are a number of challenges ahead. The paper discusses three sets of problems: (i) how to allow for social effects on welfare, recognizing the identification issues involved; (ii) the need to monitor progress in raising the consumption floor above its biological level, in addition to counting the number of people living near the floor; and (iii) addressing the longstanding concerns about prevailing approaches to making inter-country comparisons of price levels facing poor people. Some suggestions are offered for operational solutions, building on past research.

Keywords

Absolute poverty Relative poverty Consumption floor Purchasing power parity International comparison program 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10888_2016_9323_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
(DOCX 35.2 KB)

References

  1. Ahluwalia, M.S., Carter, N.G., Chenery, H.B.: Growth and poverty in developing countries. J. Dev. Econ. 6, 299–341 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almås, I.: International income inequality: measuring PPP bias by estimating Engel. American Econ. Rev. 102(2), 1093–1117 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asian Development Bank: Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures: A Summary Report. Manila: Asian Development Bank (2014)Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, A.B.: Poverty in Europe. Blackwell Press, Oxford (1998)Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, A.B., Bourguignon, F.: Poverty and inclusion from a world perspective. In: Stiglitz, J. E., Muet, P.-A. (eds.) Governance, Equity and Global Markets. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  6. Balassa, B.: The purchasing power parity doctrine: a reappraisal. J. Politic. Econ. 72, 584–596 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E.: The economic lives of the poor. J. Econ. Perspect. 21 (2), 141–167 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhagwati, J.: Why are services cheaper in poor countries?. Econ. J. 94, 279–286 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blank, R.M.: How to improve poverty measurement in the United States. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 27(2), 233–254 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, S., Ravallion, M.: How did the world’s poor fare in the 1990s?. Rev. Income Wealth 47(3), 283–300 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, S., Ravallion, M.: The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty. Q. J. Econ 125(4), 1577–1625 (2010a)Google Scholar
  12. Chen, S., Ravallion, M.: China is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty. In: Anand, S., Segal, P., Stiglitz, J. (eds.) Debates on the Measurement of Poverty. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010b)Google Scholar
  13. Chen, S., Ravallion, M.: More relatively poor people in a less absolutely poor world. Rev. Income Wealth 59(1), 1–28 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Citro, C., Michael, R.: Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1995)Google Scholar
  15. Deaton, A.: Inequality and the measurement of world poverty. Am. Econ. Rev. 100(1), 5–34 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deaton, A., Aten, B.: Trying to understand the PPPs in ICP 2011: why are the results so different? NBER Working Paper 20244. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass (2014)Google Scholar
  17. Deaton, A., Dupriez, O.: Purchasing power parity exchange rates for the global poor. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 3(2), 137–166 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duesenberry, J.S.: Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1949)Google Scholar
  19. Dutta, P., Murgai, R., Ravallion, M., van de Walle, D.: Right-to-Work? Assessing India?s Employment Guarantee Scheme in Bihar. World Bank, Washington DC (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dykstra, S., Kenny, C., Sandefur, J.: Global absolute poverty fell by almost half on Tuesday. Center for Global Development (2014)Google Scholar
  21. Easton, B.: Beware the median. Soc. Policy Res. Cent. Newslett. 82, 6–7 (2002)Google Scholar
  22. Edward, P., Sumner, A.: New estimates of global poverty and inequality: how much difference do price data really make? pp 2015–365. ECINEQ Working Paper (2015)Google Scholar
  23. Eurostat: Income Poverty and Social Exclusion in the EU25. Statistics in Focus 03 2005, Office of Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2005)Google Scholar
  24. Ferreira, F., Chen, S., Dabalen, A., Dikhanov, Y., Hamadeh, N., Joliffe, D., Narayan, A., Prydz, E., Revenga, A., Sangraula, P., Serajuddin, U., Yoshida, N.: A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: data issues, methodology and initial results. J. Econ. Inequal. this issue (2016)Google Scholar
  25. Fleurbaey, M., Maniquet, F.: A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foster, J.: Absolute versus relative poverty. Am. Econ. Rev. Paper. Proc. 88(2), 335–341 (1998)Google Scholar
  27. Foster, J., Greer, J., Thorbecke, E.: A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52, 761–765 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frank, R.H.: Choosing the right pond: human behavior and the quest for status. Oxford University Press, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  29. Friedman, J.: Being in the world: globalization and localization. Theory, Cult. Soc. 7(2), 311–328 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman, M.: A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton: Princeton University Press (1957)Google Scholar
  31. Fuller, C.J. The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press (1992)Google Scholar
  32. Garroway, C., De Laiglesia, J.R.: On the relevance of relative poverty for developing countries. OECD Development Centre Working Paper, 314, OECS, Paris (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Geertz, C.: The Religion of Java. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1976)Google Scholar
  34. Gibson, J., Le, T., Kim, B.: Prices, Engel curves and time-space deflation: impacts on poverty and inequality in Vietnam. University of Waikato. World Bank Econ. Rev. forthcoming (2016)Google Scholar
  35. Hamilton, B.: Using Engel’s Law to estimate CPI bias. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(3), 619–630 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hammond, P.: Equity, Arrow’s conditions and Rawls’ difference principle. Econometrica 44, 793–804 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hansen, B.E.: Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica 68, 575–603 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hirsch, F.: The Social Limits to Growth. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1977)Google Scholar
  39. Hunter, R.: Poverty. MacMillan Company, London (1904)Google Scholar
  40. Inklaar, R.: Price levels and economic growth: making sense of revisions to data on real incomes—A comment. Rev. Income Wealth 59(4), 614–22 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Inklaar, R., Rao, P.: Cross-country income levels over time: did the developing world suddenly become much richer? Working Paper 151, Growth and Development Center. University of Groninger, Germany (2014)Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, D., Smeeding, T.: A consumer’s guide to interpreting various us poverty measures. Fast Focus 14, Institute for Research on Poverty University of Wisconsin (2012)Google Scholar
  43. Jolliffe, D., Prydz, E.: Global poverty goals and prices. How purchasing power parity matters. Policy Research Working Paper 7256, World Bank (2015)Google Scholar
  44. Kakwani, N., Son, H.H.: Global poverty estimates based on 2011 purchasing power parity: where should the new poverty line be drawn? J. Econ. Inequal. this issue (2016)Google Scholar
  45. Klasen, S., Krivobokova, T., Greb, F., Lahoti, R., Pasaribu, S., Wiesenfarth, M.: International poverty measurement: Which way now? J. Econ. Inequal. this issue (2016)Google Scholar
  46. Lindgren, M.: The elusive quest for the subsistence line. How much does the cost of survival vary between populations? Comparative Institutional Analysis Working Paper 2015:1. Lund University, Sweden (2015)Google Scholar
  47. Luttmer, E.: Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Q. J. Econ. 120, 963–1002 (2005)Google Scholar
  48. Mack, J., Lansley, S.: Poor Britain. Allen and Unwin, London (1985)Google Scholar
  49. Majumder, A., Ray, R., Santra, S.: Preferences, purchasing power parity, and inequality analytical framework, propositions, and empirical evidence. Policy Research Working Paper 7395 World Bank (2015)Google Scholar
  50. Moatsos, M.: Global absolute poverty: behind the veil of dollars. Working Paper 77, Center for Global Economic History University of Utrecht University (2015)Google Scholar
  51. Nolan, B., Munzi, T., Smeeding, T.: Two Views of Irish Poverty Trends Background Paper to Human Development Report, vol. 2005. UNDP, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  52. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD): Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. Paris, OECD (2008)Google Scholar
  53. Rao, V.: Poverty and public celebrations in rural India. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 573(1), 85–104 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ravallion, M.: On the welfarist rationale for relative poverty lines. In: Basu, K., Kanbur, R. (eds.) Social Welfare, Moral Philosophy and Development: Essaysin Honour of Amartya Sen’s Seventy Fifth Birthday. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  55. Ravallion, M.: A reply to Reddy and Pogge. In: Anand, S., Segal, P., Stiglitz, J. (eds.) Debates on the Measurement of Poverty. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  56. Ravallion, M.: Poverty lines across the world. In: Jefferson, P.N. (ed.) Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Poverty. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  57. Ravallion, M.: Price levels and economic growth. Rev. Income Wealth 59(4), 593–613 (2013a)Google Scholar
  58. Ravallion, M.: Reply to Inklaar. Rev. Income Wealth 59(4), 623–628 (2013b)Google Scholar
  59. Ravallion, M.: An emerging new form of social protection in 21st century China. In: Oxford Companion to the Economics of China, edited by S. Fan, R. Kanbur, S. Wei, X. Zhang. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014a)Google Scholar
  60. Ravallion, M.: India’s puzzling new PPP, Center for Global Development Blog Post (2014b)Google Scholar
  61. Ravallion, M.: An exploration of the international comparison program’s new global economic landscape. NBER Working Paper, 20338 (2015)Google Scholar
  62. Ravallion, M.: Are the world’s poorest being left behind? Journal of Economic Growth, forthcoming (2016a)Google Scholar
  63. Ravallion, M.: The Economics of Poverty: History, Measurement and Policy. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford (2016b)Google Scholar
  64. Ravallion, M., Chen, S.: Weakly relative poverty. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93(4), 1251–1261 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ravallion, M., Chen, S.: More relatively poor people in a less absolutely poor world. Rev. Income Wealth 59(1), 1–28 (2013a)Google Scholar
  66. Ravallion, M., Chen, S.: A proposal for truly global poverty measures. Glob. Policy 4(3), 258–265 (2013b)Google Scholar
  67. Ravallion, M., Chen, S.: Rising food prices in poor countries: a new clue to those puzzling PPP revisions. Center for Global Development Blog Post (2015)Google Scholar
  68. Ravallion, M., Datt, G., Van de Walle, D.: Quantifying absolute poverty in the developing world. Rev. Income Wealth 37, 345–361 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ravallion, M., Chen, S., Sangraula, P.: Dollar a day revisited. World Bank Econ. Rev. 23(2), 163–184 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA (1971)Google Scholar
  71. Reddy, S., Pogge, T.W.: Debates on the Measurement of Poverty. In: Anand, S., Segal, P., Stiglitz, J. (eds.) . Oxford University Press (2010)Google Scholar
  72. Runciman, W.G.: Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1966)Google Scholar
  73. Samuelson, P.: Theoretical notes on trade problems. Rev. Econ. Stat. 46, 145–154 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sen, A.K.: Poor, relatively speaking. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 35(2), 153–69 (1983)Google Scholar
  75. Sen, A.K.: A sociological approach to the measurement of poverty: A reply to Professor Peter Townsend. Oxford Econ. Pap. 37, 669–676 (1985)Google Scholar
  76. Silver, M.: The hedonic country product dummy method and quality adjustments for purchasing power parity calculations. IMF Working Paper WP/09/271, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC (2009)Google Scholar
  77. Smith, A.: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Electronic Classic Edition, Pennsylvania State University (1776)Google Scholar
  78. Summers, R., Heston, A: The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An extended set of international comparisons, 1950-1988. Q. J. Econ. 106, 327–368 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Townsend, P.: The meaning of poverty. Br. J. Sociol. 13(3), 210–227 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Townsend, P.: Poverty in the United Kingdom: a Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth (1979)Google Scholar
  81. Townsend, P.: A sociological approach to the measurement of poverty: a rejoinder to Professor Amartya Sen. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 37(4), 659–68 (1985)Google Scholar
  82. United Nations: The Millennium Development Goals Report. United Nations Secretariat, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  83. United Nations Development Program (UNDP): Human Development Report. UNDP, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  84. World Bank: World Development Report: Poverty. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990)Google Scholar
  85. World Bank: Global Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures. 2005 International Comparison Program, World Bank, Washington, DC (2008)Google Scholar
  86. World Bank: Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures of World Economies. World Bank, Washington, DC (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations