Advertisement

The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 69–82 | Cite as

Reference parameters in Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition: Pooled-sample versus intercept-shift approaches

  • Myoung-Jae LeeEmail author
Article

Abstract

The Blinder-Oaxaca (BO) decomposition explains two groups’ difference (e.g., in wage between males and females) with regressors. The BO decomposition depends on the chosen counterfactual reference parameter representing no “discrimination”. One popular way to choose the reference parameter is simply using the pooled sample, and another way is allowing different intercepts in the pooled sample. This paper points out two problems in the latter. First, the reference slopes are a matrix-weighted average of the two group slopes where the weights depend only on the variances of the two groups, not on the levels; the levels may represent the competing “forces” to primarily influence the reference parameter, but the role of the variances should be secondary at best. Second, the reference intercept is arbitrary: the same BO decomposition holds with vastly different reference intercepts.

Keywords

Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition Reference parameter Wage gap 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blinder, A.S.: Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J. Hum. Resour. 8, 436–455 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caliendo, M., Lee, W.S.: Fat chance! Obesity and the transition from unemployment to employment. Econ. Hum. Biol. 11, 121–133 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cervellati, M., Sunde, W.: Life expectancy and economic growth: the role of the demographic transition. J. Econ. Growth 16, 99–133 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cobb-Clark, D.A., Tan, M.: Noncognitive skills, occupational attainment, and relative wages. Labour Econ. 18, 1–13 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cotton, J.: On the decomposition of wage differentials. Rev. Econ. Stat. 70, 236–243 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elder, T.E., Goddeeris, J.H., Haider, S.J.: Unexplained gaps and Oaxaca–Blinder decompositions. Labour Econ. 17, 284–290 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fortin, N.M.: The gender wage gap among young adults in the United States: the importance of money versus people. J. Human Res. 43, 886–920 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fortin, N.M., Lemieux, T., Firpo, S.: Decomposition methods in economics. In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics IV-A, pp 1–102. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grove, W.A., Hussey, A., Jetter, M.: The gender pay gap beyond human capital: heterogeneity in noncognitive skills and in labor market tastes. J. Human Res. 46, 827–874 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Imbens, G.W., Wooldridge, J.M.: Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econ. Lit. 47, 5–86 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, M.J.: Micro-econometrics for policy, program, and treatment effects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, M.J.: Treatment effects in sample selection models and their nonparametric estimation. J. Econ. Lit. 167, 317–329 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Magnani, E., Zhu, R.: Gender wage differentials among rural–urban migrants in China. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 42, 779–793 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mora, R.: A nonparametric decomposition of the Mexican American average wage gap. J. Appl. Econ. 23, 463–485 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neumark, D.: Employers’ discriminatory behavior and the estimation of wage discrimination. J. Hum. Resour. 23, 279–295 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oaxaca, R.: Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int. Econ. Rev. 14, 693–709 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oaxaca, R.L., Ransom, M.R.: On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials. J. Econ. 61, 5–21 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reimers, C.W.: Labor market discrimination against Hispanic and black men. Rev. Econ. Stat. 65, 570–579 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trejo, S.J.: Why do Mexican Americans earn low wages. J. Polit. Econ. 105, 1235–1268 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trejo, S.J.: Intergenerational progress of Mexican-origin workers in the U.S. labor market. J. Hum. Resour. 38, 467–489 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Verdugo, R.R.: Earnings differentials between black, Mexican American, and non-Hispanic white male workers: on the cost of being a minority worker. Soc. Sci. Q. 73, 663–673 (1972–1987)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yount, K.: Gender, resources across the life course, and cognitive functioning in Egypt. Demography 45, 907–926 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsKorea UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations