Advertisement

The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 465–477 | Cite as

On a new class of measures for health inequality based on ordinal data

  • Guangming Lv
  • Yang Wang
  • Yongsheng Xu
Article

Abstract

In many instances, individual health statuses are self-reported on several ordinal scales. The ordinal nature of the data creates some challenging problems in the measurement of inequalities of various distributions of health statuses in a population. In this paper, we propose and discuss a class of measures of inequalities of heath status distributions based on such ordinal data. Our measures are easy to compute and have some desirable properties often required for a reasonable measure for health inequality.

Keywords

Health inequality Self-reported health status Additivity Invariance of parallel shifts Normalization Simple aversion to median-preserving spreads 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aczél, J.: Lectures on functional equations and their applications. Academic Press, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  2. Abul Naga, R.H., Yalcin, T.: Inequality measurement for ordered response health data. J. Health Econ. 27(2), 1614–1625 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison, R.A., Foster, J.: Measuring health inequalities using qualitative data. J. Health Econ. 23, 505–524 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apouey, B.: Measuring health polarization with self-assessed health data. Health Econ. 16, 875–894 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erreygers, G.: Correcting the concentration index. J. Health Econ. 28, 504–515 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erreygers, G.: Can a single indicator measure both attainment and shortfall inequality? J. Health Econ. 28, 885–893 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erreygers, G., van Ourti, T.: Measuring socioeconomic inequality in health, health care and health financing by means of rank-dependent indices: a recipe for good practice. J. Health Econ. 30, 685–694 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Esteban, J.-M., Ray, D.: On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62(4), 819–851 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kjellsson, G., Gerdtham, U.-G.: On correcting the concentration index for binary variables. J. Health Econ. 32, 659–670 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kolm, S.: Unequal inequalities. I. J. Econ. Theory 12, 416–442 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lazar, A., Silber, J.: On the cardinal measurement of health inequality when only ordinal information is available on individual health status. Health Econ. 22, 106–113 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Reardon, S.F.: Measures of ordinal segregation. Res Econ. Inequal. 17, 129–155 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. van Doorslaer, E., Jones, A.M.: Inequalities in self-reported health: validation of a new approach to measurement. J. Health Econ. 22, 61–87 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zheng, B.: A new approach to measure socioeconomic inequality in health. J. Econ. Inequal. 9, 555–577 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of National Accounts, Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy StudiesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations