The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 235–248 | Cite as

On multidimensional indices of poverty

Article

Abstract

The contribution of recent “multidimensional indices of poverty” may not be as obvious as one thinks. There are two issues in assessing that contribution: whether one believes that a single index can ever be a sufficient statistic of poverty, and whether one aggregates in the space of “attainments,” using prices when appropriate, or “deprivations,” using weights set by the analyst. The paper argues that we should aim for a credible set of multiple indices rather than a single multidimensional index. Partial aggregation will still be necessary, but ideally the weights should be consistent with well-informed choices by poor people.

Keywords

Poverty measurement Multidimensional index Aggregation Prices 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alkire, S., Foster, J.: Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, Working Paper 7, University of Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alkire, S., Santos, M.E.: Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries. Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, Working Paper 38, University of Oxford (2010a)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alkire, S., Santos, M.E.: Multidimensional poverty index. Research Brief, Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford (2010b)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica 55, 749–764 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atkinson, A.B., Bourguignon, F.: The comparison of multi dimensional distributions of economic status. Rev. Econ. Stud. 49, 183–201 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourguignon, F., Chakravarty, S.: The measurement of multidimensional poverty. J. Econ. Ineq. 1, 25–49 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chakravarty, S., Deutsch, J., Silber, J.: On the watts multidimensional poverty index and its decomposition. World Dev. 36(6), 1067–1078 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duclos, J.-Y., Sahn, D., Younger, S.: Robust multidimensional poverty comparisons. Econ. J. 116, 943–968 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foster, J., Greer, J., Thorbecke, E.: A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52, 761–765 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haddad, L., Kanbur, R.: How serious is the neglect of intra-household inequality? Econ. J. 100, 866–881 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lokshin, M., Ravallion, M.: Rich and powerful? Subjective power and welfare in Russia. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 56, 141–172 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ravallion, M.: Poverty Comparisons. Harwood Academic Press, Chur (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ravallion, M.: Mashup indices of development. Policy Research Working Paper 5432, World Bank, Washington DC (2010a)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ravallion, M.: Troubling tradeoffs in the human development index. Policy Research Working Paper 5484, World Bank, Washington DC (2010b)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.P.: Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr (2009)
  16. 16.
    Tsui, K.-Y.: Multidimensional poverty indices. Soc. Choice Welf. 19, 69–93 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Report. New York: Palgrave Macmillan for the UNDP (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Watts, H.W.: An economic definition of poverty. In: Moynihan, D.P. (ed.), On Understanding Poverty. Basic, New York (1968)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Development Research GroupWorld BankWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations