Inequality of opportunity in the land of opportunities, 1968–2001

  • Nicolas PistolesiEmail author


We measure inequality of opportunity for earnings acquisition in the U.S. between 1968 and 2001. Following recent theories of social justice, earnings determinants are divided into two parts: Circumstances, which are characteristics outside individual control and effort representing factors impacting earnings but under individuals’ responsibility. Equality of opportunity requires that inequality of circumstances must be corrected while differences of effort must remain unaltered. Circumstances are represented by parental education and occupation, ethnic origin, place of birth and age. Effort is modeled with schooling choices and labour supply decisions. Using the PSID from 1968 to 2001, we provide two alternative assessments of inequality of opportunity using counterfactual distributions. The statistical framework is semi-parametric and builds on duration models. Finally, we conclude that inequality of opportunity represents between 20 and 43% of earnings inequality, but decreases all over the period reaching around 18% in 2001.


Equality of opportunity Inequality Income distribution Semi-parametric estimator 

JEL Classification

D31 D63 


  1. 1.
    Alesina, A., Glaeser, E.: Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford University Press, London (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alesina, A., La Ferrara, E.: Preferences of redistribution in the land of opportunities. J. Public Econ. 89(5–6), 897–931 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arneson, R.: Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philos. Stud. 56, 77–93 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 18, 59–80 (1970)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Autor, D.H., Katz, L.F., Kearney, M.S.: Trends in U.S. wage inequality: re-assessing the revisionists. Rev. Econ. Stat. 90(2), 300–323 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Betts, J., Roemer, J.: Equalizing opportunity for racial and socioeconomic groups in the United States through educational finance reform. In: Woessmann, L., Peterson, P. (eds.) Schools and the Equal Opportunity Problem. MIT, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F.H., Lustig, N. (eds.): The Microeconomics of Income Distribution Dynamics, 436 pp. World Bank, Oxford University Press, Washington, DC (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F.H., Menendez, M.: Inequality of opportunity in Brasil. Rev. Income Wealth 53(4), 585–618 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buchinsky, M.: Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963–1987: application of quantile regression. Econometrica 62(2), 405–458 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cameron, S., Taber, C.: Estimation of educational borrowing constraints using returns to schooling. J. Polit. Econ. 112(1), 132–182 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carneiro, P., Heckman, J.: The evidence on credit contraints in post-secondary schooling. Econ. J. 112, 989–1018 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Checchi, D., Peragine, V.: Regional disparities and inequality of opportunity: the case of Italy. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1874 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dardanoni, V., Fields, G.S., Roemer, J., Sanchez-Puerta, M.L.: How demanding should equality of opportunity be, and how much have we achieved? In: Morgan, S., Grusky, D., Fields, G. (eds.) Mobility and Inequality: Frontiers of Reasearch in Sociology and Economics. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davidson, R., Duclos, J.-Y.: Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 68(6), 1435–1464 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dinardo, J., Fortin, N., Lemieux, T.: Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992: a semi-parametric approach. Econometrica 64, 1001–1044 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Donald, S.G., Green, D.A., Paarsch, H.J.: Differences in wage distributions between Canada and the United States: an application of a flexible estimator of distribution functions in the presence of covariates. Rev. Econ. Stud. 67(4), 609–633 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dworkin, R.: What is equality. part 1: equality of welfare. Philos. Public Aff. 10, 185–246 (1981)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eckstein, Z., Nagypal, E.: The evolution of U.S. earnings inequality. Fed. Reserve Bank Minneap. Q. Rev. 28(2), 10–29 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gottschalk, P., Danziger, S.: Inequality of wage rates, earnings and family income in the United-States, 1975–2002. Rev. Income Wealth 51(2), 231–254 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gottschalk, P., Joyce, M.: Cross-national differences in the rise in earnings inequality: market and institutional factors. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80(4), 489–502 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gottschalk, P., Smeeding, T.M.: Cross-national comparisons of earnings and income inequality. J. Econ. Lit. 35, 663–687 (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jenkins, S.: Accounting for inequality trends: decomposition analyses for the U.K., 1971–86. Economica 62(1), 29–63 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Juhn, C., Murphy, K.M., Pierce, B.: Wage inequality and the rise in return to skill. J. Polit. Econ. 101, 410–442 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Katz, L.F., Autor, D.H.: Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality. In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3A. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katz, L.F., Murphy, K.M.: Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: supply and demand factors. Q. J. Econ. 107, 35–78 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lefranc, A., Pistolesi, N., Trannoy, A.: Inequalities of outcome vs inequalities of opportunities: are all western societies alike? Rev. Income Wealth (2005, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lemieux, T.: Increasing residual wage inequality: composition effects, noisy data, or rising demand for skills? Am. Econ. Rev. 96, 461–498 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Levy, F., Murnane, R.J.: U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: a review of recent trends and proposed explanations. J. Econ. Lit. 30, 1333–1381 (1992)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mata, J., Machado, J.A.: Couterfactual decomposition of changes in wage distributions using quantile regression. J. Appl. Econ. 20(4), 445–465 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meyer, B.D.: Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells. Econometrica 58(4), 757–782 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Neal, D.: Why has black-white skill convergence stopped? In: Hanushek, E., Welsh, F. (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Education. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    O’Neill, D., Sweetman, O., Van de Gaer, D.: The effect of measurement error and omitted variables when using transition matrices to measure intergenerational mobility. J. Econ. Inequal. 5(2), 159–178 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roemer, J.: A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philos. Public Aff. 22(2), 146–166 (1993)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roemer, J.: Equality of Opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Van De Gaer, D.: Equality of Opportunity and Investment in Human Capital. Ph.D. thesis, K.U. Leuven (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TSE-GREMAQUniversité des sciences sociales de ToulouseToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations