The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 55–81 | Cite as

Inequality and education decisions in developing countries

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the effect of inequality on school enrollment, preferred tax rate and expenditure per student in developing countries; when parents can choose between child labor, public schooling or private schooling. We present a model in which parents make schooling decisions for their children, weighing the utility benefit of having a child with formal public or private education versus the forgone income from child labor or household work. Parents vote over the preferred tax rate to finance freely provided public education. The utility benefit of an educated child is proportional to expenditure per student, so that there is congestion in public school. We find that when parents can send their children to work or to private school, high inequality leads to exit from public education at both ends of the income distribution. Thus high inequality reduces the support for public education, leading to a low tax rate and expenditure per student. Exit from public education results in both high child labor and a large fraction of students attending private school. In fact there is a threshold level of inequality above which there is no longer support for public education. In addition we explore the implications for the design of foreign aid. The results suggest that foreign aid policies should focus on promoting school attendance rather than increasing school resources, as the later policy might be offset by a reduction in the recipient country’s fiscal effort, with little impact on outcomes.

Keywords

Inequality Education Political economy Conditional cash transfers 

JEL Classifications

D31 I22 O15 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahlin, A., Johansson, E.: Individual demand for local public spending: evidence from Swedish data. Int. Tax Financ. 8, 331–351 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aitchinson, J., Brown, J.A.C.: Lognormal Distribution with Special Reference to its Uses in Economics. Cambridge University, London, GB (1957)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bearse, P., Glomm, G., Patterson, D.M.: Endogenous public expenditures on education. J. Public Econ. Theory 7, 561–577 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bearse, P., Gloom, G., Ravikumar, B.: Education finance in a tiebout economy (2001) (unpublished)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benabou, R.: Equity and efficiency in human capital investment: the local connection. Rev. Econ. Stud. 63, 237–264 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F.H.G., Leite, P.G.: Conditional cash transfers, schooling and child labor: micro-simulating Brazil’s Bolsa Escola program. World Bank Econ. Rev. 17(2), 229–254 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Card, D., Krueger, A.B.: School resources and student outcomes: an overview of the literature and new evidence from North and South Carolina. J. Econ. Perspect. 10, 31–50 (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eckstein, Z., Zilcha, I.: The effect of compulsory schooling on growth, income distribution and welfare. J. Public Econ. 54, 339–359 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Epple, D., Romano, R.E.: Ends against the middle: determining public provision when there are private alternatives. J. Public Econ. 62, 297–325 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fernández, R., Rogerson, R.: On the political economy of education subsidies. Rev. Econ. Stud. 62, 249–262 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fernández, R., Rogerson, R.: Income distribution, communities and the quality of public education. Q. J. Econ. 111, 135–164 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fernández, R., Rogerson, R.: Education finance reform: a dynamic perspective. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 16, 67–84 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fernández, R., Rogerson, R.: Public education and income distribution: a dynamic quantitative evaluation of education-finance reform. Am. Econ. Rev. 88, 813–833 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fernández, R., Rogerson, R.: Equity and resources: an analysis of education finance systems. J. Polit. Econ. 11, 858–897 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferreira, F.H.G.: Education for the masses? The interaction between wealth, educational and political inequalities. Econ. transit. 9, 533–552 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gertler, P., Glewwe, P.: The willingness to pay for education in developing countries: evidence from rural Peru. J. Public Econ. 42, 251–275 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glomm, G.: Parental choice of human capital investment. J. Dev. Econ. 53, 99–144 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Glomm, G.: Inequality majority voting and the redistributive effects of public education funding. Pac. Econ. Rev. 9, 93–101 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Glomm, G., Ravikumar, B.: Opting out of publicly provided services: a majority voting result. Soc. Choice Welf. 15, 187–199 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Glomm, G., Ravikumar, B.: Public versus private investment in human capital: endogenous growth and income inequality. J. Polit. Econ. 100, 813–834 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glomm, G., Ravikumar, B.: Public education and income inequality. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 19, 289–300 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grootaert, C., Patrinos, H.A.: The policy analysis of child labor: a comparative study. Saint Martin Press, New York, USA (1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kenny, L.W.: The collective allocation of commodities in a democratic society: a generalization. Public Choice. 33, 117–120 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krusell, P., Rios-Rull, J.V.: On the size of U.S. government: political economy in the neoclassical growth model. Am. Econ. Rev. 89, 1156–1181 (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Psacharopoulos, G.: Child labor versus educational attainment. Some evidence from Latin America. J. Popul. Econ. 10, 377–386 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ravallion, M., Wodon, Q.: Does child labour displace schooling? Evidence on behavioural responses to an enrollment subsidy. Econ. J. 110, C158–C175 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robitaille, D.F.: National Contexts for Mathematics and Science Education. Pacific Educational Press, Vancouver, Canada (1997)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saint-Paul, G., Verdier, T.: Education democracy and growth. J. Dev. Econ. 42, 399–407 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shapiro, P., Rubinfeld, D.L.: Micro-estimations of the demand for schooling: evidence from Michigan and Massachusetts. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 19, 381–398 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singh, R.D., Santiago, M.: Farm earnings, educational attainment and the role of public policy: some evidence from Mexico. World Dev. 25, 2144–2154 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stiglitz, J.E.: The demand for education in public and private school systems. J. Public Econ. 3, 349–385 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sylwester, K.: Income inequality, education expenditures and growth. J. Dev. Econ. 63, 379–398 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sylwester, K.: Can education expenditures reduce income inequality? Econ. Educ. Rev. 21, 43–52 (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sylwester, K.: A model of public education and income inequality with a subsistence constraint. South. Econ. J. 69, 144–158 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tanaka, R.: Inequality as a determinant of child labor. Econ. Lett. 80, 93–97 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang, J.: Optimal public investments in education and endogenous growth. Scand. J. Econ. 98, 387–402 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.World BankWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of Information Science and EngineeringTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations