Safety segregation: The importance of gender, race, and ethnicity on workplace risk
Using micro data of the Bureau of Labor Statistics we examine the extent and the causes of workplace risk inequality in the United States. Far more men than women and far more blacks and Hispanics than whites are killed or injured at work. Occupational differences between men and women and among the races explain most, but not all, of the workplace risk inequality in the United States. After controlling for occupation, men experience twice as many workplace fatalities as women but fewer nonfatal injuries, while black and Hispanic males experience slightly more workplace fatalities than white males but fewer nonfatal workplace injuries. We find little evidence men choose higher risk jobs and women lower risk jobs because of differences in economic circumstances or risk preferences. But economic and taste factors explain large fractions of the fatal and the nonfatal injury rate differences by race/ethnicity. Workplace risk inequality among the races primarily reflects differences in educational attainment.
Key wordseconomic inequality employment conditions fatalities hedonic equilibrium non-fatal injuries Oaxaca decomposition occupational choice standardized injury rates workplace safety
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Altonji, J.G. and Blank, R.M.: Race and gender in the labor market, In: O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics vol. 3c, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 1999, pp. 3143–3259.Google Scholar
- 3.DeLeire, T. and Levy, H.: Gender, occupation choice and the risk of death at work, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8574, Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
- 7.Hamermesh, D.S.: Changing inequality in work injuries and work timing, Monthly Labor Review 122 (1999), 22–30.Google Scholar
- 8.Hersch, J.: Compensating differentials for gender-specific job injury risks, American Economic Review 88 (1998), 598–607.Google Scholar
- 9.Hopkins, J.: Fatality rates increase for Hispanic workers, USA Today, On-line Edition, www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2003-03-12-hispanic-workers_x.htm, 12 April 2003.
- 11.Kniesner, T.J. and Leeth, J.D.: Simulating Workplace Safety Policy, Kluwer, Boston, 1995.Google Scholar
- 13.Leeth, J.D. and Ruser, J.: Occupational injury rates by race and gender, 1996–1998, Mimeo, Bentley College, http://web.bentley.edu/empl/l/jleeth, 2003.
- 15.Leigh, J.P.: Compensating wages for job-related deaths: The opposing arguments, Journal of Economic Issues 23 (1989), 823–842.Google Scholar
- 27.Rosen, S.: The theory of equalizing differences, In: O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.), The Handbook of Labor Economics vol. 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986, pp. 641–692.Google Scholar
- 29.Ruser, J.W. and Pergamit, M.: Workers' compensation ‘reforms’ and benefit claiming, Mimeo, Washington, D.C., 2005.Google Scholar
- 30.Saffer, H. and Chaloupka, F.: Demographic differentials in the demand for alcohol and illicit drugs, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 6432, Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
- 31.Smedley, B.D., Stith, A.Y., and Nelson, A.R. (eds.): Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.Google Scholar
- 32.Thaler, R. and Rosen, S.: The value of saving a life: Evidence from the labor market, In: N. Terleckyj (ed.), Household Production and Consumption, Columbia University Press, New York, N.Y., 1975, pp. 265–297.Google Scholar
- 33.U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2000, USDL Release 01-261, 2001.Google Scholar
- 34.U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Lost-worktime injuries and illnesses: Characteristics and resulting time away from work, 2000, USDL Release 02-196, 2002.Google Scholar
- 35.Viscusi, W.K.: The value of risks to life and health, Journal of Economic Literature 31 (1993), 1912–1946.Google Scholar