The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 33–55 | Cite as

Survey nonresponse and the distribution of income

  • Anton Korinek
  • Johan A. Mistiaen
  • Martin RavallionEmail author


The paper examines the distributional implications of selective compliance in sample surveys, whereby households with different incomes are not equally likely to participate. Poverty and inequality measurement implications are discussed for monotonically decreasing and inverted-U compliance-income relationships. We demonstrate that the latent income effect on the probability of compliance can be estimated from information on response rates across geographic areas. On implementing the method on the Current Population Survey for the U.S. we find that the compliance probability falls monotonically as income rises. Correcting for nonresponse appreciably increases mean income and inequality, but has only a small impact on poverty incidence up to poverty lines common in the U.S.


income distribution poverty and inequality measurement survey nonresponse 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alho, J.M.: Adjusting for nonresponse bias using logistic regression, Biometrica 77(3) (1990), 617–624. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality, J. Economic Theory 2 (1970), 244–263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of poverty, Econometrica 55 (1987), 749–764. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atkinson, A.B. and Micklewright, J.: On the reliability of income data in the family expenditure survey 1970–1977, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 146(1) (1983), 33–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhalla, S.: Imagine There's No Country: Poverty, Inequality and Growth in the Era of Globalization, Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, 2002. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourguignon, F. and Morrisson, C.: Inequality among world citizens: 1820–1992, American Economic Review 92(4) (2002), 727–744. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics: Urban Family Budgets and Comparative Indexes for Selected Urban Areas, U.S. Department of Labor, 1981. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Census Bureau: Poverty in the United States: 2001, Current Population Report P60-219, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 2001. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Census Bureau: Current population survey – design and methodology, Technical Paper 63RV, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 2002. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chakravarty, S.R. and Eichhorn, W.: Measurement of income inequality: Observed versus true data, In: W. Eichhorn (ed.), Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1994. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chesher, A. and Schluter, C.: Welfare measurement and measurement error, Review of Economic Studies 69 (2002), 357–378. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cowell, F.A. and Victoria-Feser, M.: Robustness of inequality measures, Econometrica 64 (1996), 77–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deming, W.E.: On a probability mechanism to attain an economic balance between the resultant error of response and the bias of nonresponse, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 48 (1953), 743–772. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eichhorn, W., Funke, H. and Richter, W.F.: Tax progression and inequality of income distribution, J. Mathematical Economics 13 (1984), 127–131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Friar, M.E. and Leonard, H.B.: Variations in cost of living across states, Taubman Center for State and Local Government, John F. Kennedy School, Harvard University, 1998. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Groves, R.E. and Couper, M.P.: Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys, Wiley, New York, 1998. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hansen, L.P.: Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators, Econometrica 50(4) (1982), 1029–1054. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holt, D. and Elliot, D.: Methods of weighting for unit nonresponse, The Statistician 40 (1991), 333–342. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Korinek, A., Mistiaen, J. and Ravallion, M.: An econometric method of correcting for unit nonresponse bias in surveys, Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, 2004, forthcoming. Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lillard, L., Smith, J.P. and Welch, F.: What do we really know about wages? The importance of nonreporting and census imputation, J. Political Economy 94(3) (1986), 489–506. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Little, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.B.: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Wiley, New York, 1987. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nijman, T. and Verbeek, M.: Nonresponse in panel data: The impact on estimates of a life cycle consumption function, J. Applied Econometrics 7 (1992), 243–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peracchi, F.: Econometrics, Wiley, New York, 2001. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ravallion, M.: Poverty rankings using noisy data on living standards, Economics Letters 45 (1994), 481–485. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ravallion, M.: Should poverty measures be anchored to the national accounts?, Economic and Political Weekly 34 (2000, August 26), 3245–3252. Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ravallion, M.: Measuring aggregate welfare in developing countries: How well do national accounts and surveys agree?, Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (2002), 645–652. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sala-i-Martin, X.: The world distribution of income (estimated from individual country distributions), NBER Working Paper No. W8933, 2002. Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Scott, K. and Steele, D.: Measuring welfare in developing countries: Living standards measurement study surveys, In: Surveys in Developing and Transition Countries, UN Statistical Division, 2004, forthcoming. Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Van Praag, B., Hagenaars, A. and Van Eck, W.: The influence of classification and observation errors on the measurement of income inequality, Econometrica 51 (1983), 1093–1108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anton Korinek
    • 1
  • Johan A. Mistiaen
    • 1
  • Martin Ravallion
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Development Research GroupWorld BankWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations