Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation
In this paper, we provide empirical evidence to the effect that strong patent rights may complement competition-increasing product market reforms in fostering innovation. First, we find that the product market reform induced by the large-scale internal market reform of the European Union in 1992 enhanced, on average, innovative investments in manufacturing industries of countries with strong patent rights since the pre-sample period, but not so in industries of countries with weaker patent rights. Second, the positive response to the product market reform is more pronounced in industries where, in general, innovators tend to value patent protection higher than in other industries, except for the manufacture of electrical and optical equipment. The observed complementarity between competition and patent protection can be rationalized using a Schumpeterian growth model with step-by-step innovation. In such a model, better patent protection prolongs the period over which a firm that successfully escapes competition by innovating, actually enjoys higher monopoly rents from its technological upgrade.
KeywordsIntellectual property rights Competition Innovation
JEL ClassificationO3 L1 O4 L5
- Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., & Howitt, P. (2014). What do we learn from Schumpeterian growth theory? In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 2B, Chap. 1, 1st ed., pp. 515–563). Oxford: Elsevier (North Holland).Google Scholar
- Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728.Google Scholar
- Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2009). The economics of growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Aghion, P., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2013). Revisiting the relationship between competition, patenting, and innovation. In D. Acemoglu, M. Arellano, & E. Dekel (Eds.), Advances in economics and econometrics (Vol. 1 of Econometric Society Monographs (No. 49), Chap. 15, pp. 451–455). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Baum, C. F., Schaffer, M. E., & Stillman, S. (2007). Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/generalized methods of moments estimation and testing. Stata Journal, 7(4), 465–506.Google Scholar
- Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2009). Financial institutions and markets across countries and over time: Data and analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4943.Google Scholar
- Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2010a). Financial development and structure database (November 2010 version), http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/0,,contentMDK:20696167~pagePK:64214825~piPK:64214943~theSitePK:469382,00.html, accessed 28 Dec 2011, and http://go.worldbank.org/X23UD9QUX0, accessed 15 Feb 2015.
- Bloom, N., Draca, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2015). Trade-induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. Review of Economic Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2008). Against intellectual monopoly. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Budish, E., Roin, B. N., & Williams, H. (2015). Do firms underinvest in long-term research? Evidence from cancer clinical trials. American Economic Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Buigues, P., Ilzkovitz, F., & Lebrun, J.-F. (1990). The impact of the internal market by industrial sector: The challenge for the member states. Commission of the European Communities, European Economy: Social Europe, Special Edition.Google Scholar
- Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper 7552.Google Scholar
- EU KLEMS. (2008). The EU KLEMS Database (March 2008 Release) and EU KLEMS Linked Data (October 2008 Release), see Marcel Timmer, Mary O’Mahony & Bart Van Ark, The EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts: An Overview, University of Groningen & University of Birmingham, http://www.euklems.net, accessed 15 Oct 2009, and http://www.euklems.net/linked.shtml, accessed 2 Feb 2012.
- European Patent Organization (EPOrg). (2010). List of contracting states sorted according to the date of accession (last updated 18 August 2010). http://www.epo.org/about-us/organisation/member-states/date.html, accessed 2 Oct 2012.
- Gilbert, R. (2006). Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the competition-innovation debate? In A. B. Jaffe, J. Lerner & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation policy and the economy (Vol. 6, Chap. 6, pp. 159–215). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Guimaraes, P., & Portugal, P. (2010). A simple feasible alternative procedure to estimate models with high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata Journal, 10(4), 628–649.Google Scholar
- Hall, B. H. (2005). Exploring the patent explosion. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1/2), 35–48.Google Scholar
- Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg M. (2001). The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper 8498.Google Scholar
- Lerner, J. (2000). 150 years of patent protection. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper 7478.Google Scholar
- Lerner, J. (2002). Patent protection and innovation over 150 years. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper 8977.Google Scholar
- Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Washington, DC: Insitute for International Economics.Google Scholar
- O’Mahony, M., Castaldi, C., Los, B., Bartelsman, E., Maimaiti, Y., Peng, F. (2008). EUKLEMS - Linked data: Sources and methods. Mimeo, University of Birmingham, http://www.euklems.net, accessed 18 Feb 2015.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Research and development expenditure in industry 2009: Analytical business enterprise research and development (ANBERD). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/rd_exp-2009-en-fr, accessed 23 Jan 2015.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). STAN R&D Expenditure in Industry (ISIC Rev. 3.1) - Analytical business enterprise research and development (ANBERD) database (edition 2011, archived version, last updated 15 Jan 2013). doi:10.1787/data-00556-en and http://www.oecd.org/sti/anberd, accessed 23 Jan 2015.
- Park, W. G. (2008b). Patent protection index. http://www.american.edu/cas/econ/faculty/park.html, accessed 18 Jan 2011, and http://nw08.american.edu/~wgp/, accessed 17 Feb 2015.
- Rapp, R. T., & Rozek, R. P. (1990). Benefits and costs of intellectual property protection in developing countries. Journal of World Trade, 24(5), 75–102.Google Scholar
- Scotchmer, S. (2004). Innovation and incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV Regressions. In D. W. K. Andrews & J. H. Stock (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg (pp. 80–108). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- World Intellectual Property Organization. (2012). WIPO Lex, http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/, accessed 15 Mar 2012 and 30 Sept 2014.