Journal of Economic Growth

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 157–181 | Cite as

Leisure goods, education attainment and fertility choice

  • Ragchaasuren Galindev


This paper proposes a novel mechanism for the fertility decline that occurred across the world since the late nineteenth century. It suggests that the rise in the cost of children relative to leisure goods in the process of development contributed to the decline in fertility. The paper develops a unified growth model in which children are substitutes for leisure goods in the parental utility function. The theory suggests that the rise in income, the decline in the relative price of leisure goods and the increase in educational attainment in the process of development speed up the demographic transition from high to low fertility and contributed to the transition from stagnation to growth.


Fertility Leisure goods Technological progress Growth 

JEL Classification

J13 O11 O33 O40 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, G. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Universities-NBER conference series (Vol. 11, pp. 209–231). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker G. (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal 75: 493–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker G. (1981) A treatise on the family. Harvard Pressm, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker G., Lewis H. G. (1973) On the interaction between quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81: S279–S288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boldrin M., Jones L. (2002) Mortality, fertility and saving in a Malthusian economy. Review of Economic Dynamics 5: 775–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caldwell J. C. (1976) Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review 2(3/4): 321–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, G., & Cummins., N. (2010). Malthus to modernity: England’s first fertility transition, 1760–1800. MPRA paper 25.Google Scholar
  8. Costa, D. L. (1997). Less of a luxury: The rise of recreation since 1888. NBER Working Paper 6054.Google Scholar
  9. Doepke M. (2004) Accounting for fertility during the transition to growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9(3): 347–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doepke M. (2005) Child mortality and fertility decline: Does the Barro-Becker model fit the facts?. Journal of Population Economics 18(2): 337–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandez-Villaverde J. (2001) Was Malthus right? Economic growth and population dynamics. University of Pennsylvania, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  12. Francis, N., & Ramey, A. V. (2008). A century of work and leisure. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  13. Galor, O. (2005). From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. In Handbook of economic growth (pp. 171–293). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Galor O., Moav O. (2002) Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 1133–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galor O., Weil D. (1996) The gender gap, fertility, and growth. American Economic Review 86: 374–387Google Scholar
  16. Galor O., Weil D. (1999) From Malthusian stagnation to modern growth. American Economic Review 89: 150–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galor O., Weil D. (2000) Population, technology and growth: From the Malthusian regime to the demographic transition. American Economic Review 110: 806–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenwood J., Seshadri A. (2002) The U.S. demographic transition. American Economic Review 92: 153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones C. (2001) Was an industrial revolution inevitable? Economic Growth over the very long run. Advances in macroeconomics 1(2): 1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, L., & Tertilt, M. (2008). An economic history of fertility in the U.S. In P. Rubert (Ed.), Frontiers of family economics (Vol. 1). Emerald Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  21. Kalemli-Ozcan S. (2002) Does mortality decline promote economic growth?. Journal of Economic Growth 7(4): 411–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalemli-Ozcan S. (2003) A Stochastic model of mortality, fertility, and human capital investment. Journal of Development Economics 70(1): 103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kögel T., Prskawets A. (2001) Agricultural productivity growth and escape from the Malthusian trap. Journal of Economic Growth 6(4): 337–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kopecky, K. (2005). The trends in retirement. International Economic Review (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  25. Lagerlof N. (2003) From Malthus to modern growth: Can epidemics explain the three regimes?. International Economic Review 44(2): 755–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lagerlof N. (2006) The Galor-Weil model revisited: A quantitative exploration. Review of Economic Dynamics 9: 116–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lebergott S. (1996) Consumer expenditures: New measures and old motives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  28. Maddison A. (2001) The world economy: A millennial perspective. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Malthus, T. (1803). An essay on the principle of population. London: J. M. Dent and Sons, Ltd; New York: E. P. Dutton and Co.Google Scholar
  30. Mitchell, B. (1998). International historical statistics: The Americas, 1750–1988, 4th Ed. New-York: Stockton Press; London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  31. Owen J. D. (1969) The price of leisure: An economic analysis of the demand for leisure time. Rotterdam University Press, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  32. Owen J. D. (1971) The demand for leisure. Journal of Political Economy 79(1): 56–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soares R. (2005) Mortality reductions, educational attainment and fertility choice. American Economic Review 95(3): 580–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tamura R. (2006) Human capital and economic development. Journal of Development Economics 79(1): 26–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Voth H. (1998) Time and work in eighteenth-century london. Journal of Economic History 58(1): 29–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williamson J. (1995) The evolution of global labor markets since 1830: Background evidence and hypotheses. Explorations in Economic History 32(2): 141–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen’s University Management SchoolQueens University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations