The power of the family
- 7.4k Downloads
We study the importance of family ties on economic behavior. We define our measure of family ties using individual responses from the World Value Survey (WVS) regarding the role of the family and the love and respect that children are expected to have for their parents in 81 countries. We show that with strong family ties home production is higher and families larger, labor force participation of women and youngsters, and geographical mobility lower. To assess causality, we look at the behavior of second generation immigrants. Our results overall indicate a significant influence of the strength of family ties on economic outcomes.
KeywordsFamily ties Culture Immigrants
JEL ClassificationZ10 Z13
We thank Kenneth Chay, Steve Davis, Rafael di Tella, Oded Galor, Ed Glaeser, David Levine, Assar Lindbeck, Marc Rosenzweig, Andrei Shleifer and seminar participants at Boston College, Boston Fed, Boston University, Brown University, Ente Einaudi (Rome), the Haas School of Business, Harvard Business School, the IIES (Stockholm), INSEAD (Paris), Stanford GSB, the University of British Columbia, UCLA-Anderson School of Management, UC San Diego, the NBER Macroeconomics and Individual Decision Making conference and the IZA-SOLETransatlantic Meeting of Labor Economists for useful comments.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Alesina A.F., Glaeser E.L., Sacerdote B. (2005) Work and leisure in the United States and Europe: Why so different? NBER Macroeconomic Annual 20: 1–64Google Scholar
- Algan Y., Cahuc P. (2007) The roots of low European Employment: Family culture? In: Frenkel J., Pissarides C. (eds) NBER Macroeconomic Annual. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2010). Inherited trust and growth. American Economic Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Banfield E. C. (1958) The moral basis of a backward society. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bartel A. (1979) The migration decision: What role does job mobility play? American Economic Review 69: 775–786Google Scholar
- Borjas G. (1995) Ethnicity, neighborhoods, and human-capital externalities. American Economic Review 85(3): 365–390Google Scholar
- Card, D., DiNardo, J., & Estes, E. (1998). The more things change: Immigrants and the children of immigrants in the 1940s, the 1970s, the 1990s. NBER Working Paper 6519.Google Scholar
- Faggio, G., & Nickell, S. (2006). Patterns of work across the OECD. CEP Discussion Paper No. 730.Google Scholar
- Giuliano P. (2010) Ties that matter: Cultural norms and family formation in Western Europe. In: Brown C., Eichengreen B., Reich M. (eds) Labor in the era of globalization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Hammermesh, B. M. D., & Weil, P. (2006). Different but equal: Total work, gender and social norms in EU and US time use. MimeoGoogle Scholar
- Jaumotte, F. (2003). Female labour force participation: Past trends and main determinants in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department WP 376.Google Scholar
- Korpi W. (2000) Faces of inequality: Gender, class and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics 7: 127–191Google Scholar
- Luttmer, E., & Singhal, M. (2008). Culture, context and the taste for redistribution. NBER WP 14268.Google Scholar
- Prescott E. (2004) Why do Americans work so much more than Europeans? Federal Reserve of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 28: 2–13Google Scholar
- Schwartz S., Bardi A., Bianchi G. (2000) Values adaptation to the imposition and collapse of communist regimes in east-Central Europe. In: Renshon S. A., Duckitt J. (eds) Political psychology: Cultural and cross-cultural foundations. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar