Advertisement

Journal of Economic Growth

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 187–228 | Cite as

Dualism and cross-country growth regressions

  • Jonathan Temple
  • Ludger Wößmann
Original Article

Abstract

This paper develops empirical growth models suitable for dual economies, and studies the relationship between structural change and economic growth. Changes in the structure of employment will raise aggregate productivity when the marginal product of labor varies across sectors. The models in the paper incorporate this effect in a more flexible way than previous work. Estimates of the models imply sizeable marginal product differentials, and indicate that the reallocation of labor makes a significant contribution to the international variation in productivity growth.

Keywords

Structural change Dualism Wage differentials TFP growth 

JEL Classifications

O11 O40 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acemoglu D., Zilibotti F. (1999). Information Accumulation in Development. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 5–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkeson A., & Kehoe P.J. (2000). Paths of Development for Early and Late-Bloomers in a Dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin Model. Manuscript, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  3. Bardhan P.K., Udry C. (1999). Development microeconomics. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro R.J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2): 407–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro R.J. (1999). Notes on growth accounting. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(2): 119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barro R.J., Lee J.-W. (2001). International data on educational attainment: Updates and implications. Oxford Economic Papers, 53(3): 541–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. (2004). Economic growth (2nd ed). Cambridge MA, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu K. (1997). Analytical development economics: The less developed economy revisited. Cambridge MA, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Baum C.F., Schaffer M.E., Stillman S. (2003). Instrumental Variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing. Stata Journal, 3(1): 1–31Google Scholar
  10. Bencivenga V.R., Smith B.D. (1997). Unemployment, migration, and growth. Journal of Political Economy, 105(3): 582–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernanke B.S., Gürkaynak R.S. (2001). Is growth exogenous? Taking Mankiw, Romer, and Weil seriously. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 16, 11–57Google Scholar
  12. Bertrand T., Squire L. (1980). The relevance of the dual economy model—a case-study of Thailand. Oxford Economic Papers, 32(3): 480–511Google Scholar
  13. Blackorby C., Schworm W. (1988). The existence of input and output aggregates in aggregate production functions. Econometrica, 56(3): 613–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bosworth B.P., Collins S.M. (2003). The empirics of growth: an update. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 113–206Google Scholar
  15. Caselli F. (2005). Accounting for cross-country income differences. In: Philippe Aghion, Steven Durlauf (Eds), Handbook of economic growth (Vol 1A). Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 679–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caselli F., Coleman W.J. II (2001). The U.S. structural transformation and regional convergence: A reinterpretation. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3): 584–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chanda A., Dalgaard C.-J. (2005). Dual economies and international total factor productivity differences. Manuscript, University of CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  18. Chenery H., Syrquin M. (1975). Patterns of development, 1950–1970. London, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Chenery H., Robinson S., Syrquin M. (1986). Industrialization and growth: A comparative study. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Denison E.F. (1967). Why growth rates differ: Postwar experiences in nine western countries. Washington, BrookingsGoogle Scholar
  21. Denison E.F. (1974). Accounting for United States economic growth 1929–1969. Washington, BrookingsGoogle Scholar
  22. Dennis B.N., İşcan T.B. (2004). Productivity growth and agricultural out-migration in the United States. Manuscript, University of the PacificGoogle Scholar
  23. Doepke M. (2004). Accounting for fertility decline during the transition to growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(3): 347–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dowrick S. (1989). Sectoral change, catching up and slowing down: OECD post-war economic growth revisited. Economics Letters, 31(4): 331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dowrick S. (2005). Errors in the Penn World Table demographic data. Economics Letters, 87, 243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dowrick S., Gemmell N. (1991). Industrialisation, catching up and economic growth: a comparative study across the world’s capitalist economies. Economic Journal, 101(405): 263–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Echevarria C. (1997). Changes in sectoral composition associated with economic growth. International Economic Review, 38(2): 431–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Falkinger J., Grossman V. (2005). Institutions and development: The interaction between trade regime and political system. Journal of Economic Growth, 10, 231–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feder G. (1983). On exports and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 12(1): 59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feder G. (1986). Growth in semi-industrial countries. In: Chenery H., Robinson S., Syrquin M. (Eds), Industrialization and growth: A comparative study. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Felipe J., Fisher F.M. (2003). Aggregation in production functions: What applied economists should know. Metroeconomica, 54, 208–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fisher F.M. (1992). Aggregation: Aggregate production functions and related topics. Hemel Hempstead, Harvester WheatsheafGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuller W.A. (1977). Some properties of a modification of the limited information estimator. Econometrica, 45(4): 939–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2003). FAOSTAT Statistical Databases. http://apps.fao.org/default.htm [22042003].Google Scholar
  35. Galor O., Moav O., Vollrath D. (2005). Land inequality and the emergence of human capital promoting institutions. Manuscript, Brown UniversityGoogle Scholar
  36. Galor O., & Mountford A. (2004). Trading population for productivity. Working Paper 2004–16, Brown University, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  37. Galor O., Mountford A. (2006). Trade and the great divergence: The family connection. American Economic Review, 96, 229–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Galor O., Weil D.N. (2000). Population, technology and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review, 90, 806–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gemmell N. (1996). Evaluating the impacts of human capital stocks and accumulation on economic growth: Some new evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58(1): 9–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gemmell N., Lloyd T. (2002). An extended ‘Feder’ model of dualistic growth. Economics Bulletin, 15(9): 1–6Google Scholar
  41. Gollin D. (2002). Getting income shares right. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2): 458–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gollin D., Parente S.L., Rogerson R. (2002). Structural transformation and cross-country income differences. Manuscript, University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  43. Gollin D., Parente S.L., Rogerson R. (2004). Farm work, home work and international productivity differences. Review of Economic Dynamics, 7, 827–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Graham B.S., Temple J.R.W. (2006). Rich nations, poor nations: How much can multiple equilibria explain?. Journal of Economic Growth, 11(1): 5–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenwood J., Seshadri A. (2005). Technological progress and economic transformation. In: Philippe Aghion, Steven Durlauf (Eds), Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol 1B). Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 1225–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Greenwood J., Uysal G. (2005). New goods and the transition to a new economy. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(2): 99–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gylfason T., Zoega G. (2004). The road from agriculture. Manuscript, University of IcelandGoogle Scholar
  48. Hahn J., Hausman J., Kuersteiner G. (2004). Estimation with weak instruments: Accuracy of higher-order bias and MSE approximations. Econometrics Journal, 7, 272–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hansen G., Prescott E.C. (2002). Malthus to Solow. American Economic Review, 60, 895–911Google Scholar
  50. Heston A., Summers R., & Aten B. (2002). Penn World Table version 6.1. Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania, October. http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu.Google Scholar
  51. Humphries H., Knowles S. (1998). Does agriculture contribute to economic growth? some empirical evidence. Applied Economics, 30, 775–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Imbs J., Wacziarg R. (2003). Stages of diversification. American Economic Review, 93(1): 63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jeong H., Townsend R.M. (2005). Sources of TFP growth: Occupational choice and financial deepening. Manuscript, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  54. Jorgenson D.W., Griliches Z. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. Review of Economic Studies, 34, 249–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jorgenson D.W., Stiroh K.J. (2000). U.S. economic growth at the industry level. American Economic Review, 90, 161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kelley A.C., Williamson J.G. (1973). Sources of growth methodology in low-income countries: A critique. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(1): 138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Klenow P., & Rodriguez-Clare A. (1997). The neoclassical revival in growth economics: Has it gone too far? NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 73–103Google Scholar
  58. Koenker R., Hallock K.F. (2001). Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4): 143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kongsamut P., Rebelo S., Xie D. (2001). Beyond balanced growth. Review of Economic Studies, 68(4): 869–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kuznets S. (1961). Economic growth and the contribution of agriculture: Notes on measurement. International Journal of Agrarian Affairs, 3(1): 56–75Google Scholar
  61. Kuznets S. (1971). Economic growth of nations: Total output and production structure. Cambridge MA, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  62. Laitner J. (2000). Structural change and economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, 67(3): 545–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Landon-Lane J., Robertson P.E. (2003) Accumulation and productivity growth in industrializing economies. Manuscript, UNSW, Australia.Google Scholar
  64. Lewis W.A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2): 139–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lipsey R.G., Carlaw K.I. (2004). Total factor productivity and the measurement of technological change. Canadian Journal of Economics, 37, 1118–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lucas R.E. Jr. (2004). Life earnings and rural–urban migration. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1, pt. 2): S29–S59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mankiw N.G., Romer D., Weil D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2): 407–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mas-Colell A., Razin A. (1973). A model of intersectoral migration and growth. Oxford Economic Papers, 25(1): 72–79Google Scholar
  69. May K. (1946). The aggregation problem for a one-industry model. Econometrica, 14(1): 285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mazumdar D. (1987). Rural–urban migration in developing countries. In: Mills E.S. (Ed), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol II). Amsterdam, North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  71. Moreira M.J. (2003). A conditional likelihood ratio test for structural models. Econometrica, 71(4): 1027–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Moreira M.J., Poi B.P. (2003). Implementing conditional tests with correct size in the simultaneous equations model. Stata Journal, 1(1): 1–15Google Scholar
  73. Naqvi S.N.H. (1996). The significance of development economics. World Development, 24(6): 975–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Neary J.P. (1978). Dynamic stability and the theory of factor-market distortions. American Economic Review, 68(4): 671–682Google Scholar
  75. Ngai L.R., Pissarides C. (2004). Structural change in a multi-sector model of growth. CEP Discussion paper no. 627, London School of Economics, June.Google Scholar
  76. Paci R., Pigliaru F. (1999). Is dualism still a source of convergence in Europe?. Applied Economics, 31(11): 1423–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pack H. (1992). Technology gaps between industrial and developing countries: Are there dividends for latecomers?. In: Summers L.H., Shah S. (Eds), Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, 1992Google Scholar
  78. Parente S.L., Rogerson R., Wright R. (2000). Homework in development economics: Household production and the wealth of nations. Journal of Political Economy, 108(4): 680–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Poirson H. (2000). Factor reallocation and growth in developing countries. IMF working Paper No. WP/00/94, June.Google Scholar
  80. Poirson H. (2001). The impact of intersectoral labour reallocation on economic growth. Journal of African Economies, 10(1): 37–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pritchett L. (2000). The tyranny of concepts: CUDIE (Cumulated, Depreciated, Investment Effort) is not capital. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(4): 361–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pritchett L. (2001). Where has all the education gone?. World Bank Economic Review, 15(3): 367–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pu S.S. (1946). A note on macroeconomics. Econometrica, 14(4): 299–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ray D. (1998). Development economics. Princeton NJ, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  85. Restuccia D., Yang D.T., Zhu X. (2006). Agriculture and aggregate productivity: A quantitative cross-country analysis. Manuscript, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  86. Robertson P.E. (1999). Economic growth and the return to capital in developing economies. Oxford Economic Papers, 57(4): 577–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Robinson S. (1971). Sources of growth in less developed countries: A cross-section study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85(3): 391–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ruttan V. (1998). The new growth theory and development economics: A survey. Journal of Development Studies, 35(2): 1–26Google Scholar
  89. Schmitt G. (1989). Simon Kuznets’ sectoral shares in labour force: A different explanation of his (I+S)/A ratio. American Economic Review, 79(5): 1262–1276Google Scholar
  90. Stern N. (1991). The determinants of growth. Economic Journal, 101(404): 122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stock J.H., Wright J.H., Yogo M. (2002). A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20(4): 518–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Syrquin M. (1984). Resource reallocation and productivity growth. In: Syrquin M., Taylor L., Westphal L.E. (Eds), Economic Structure and Performance. London, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  93. Syrquin M. (1986). Productivity growth and factor reallocation. In: Chenery H., Robinson S., Syrquin M. Industrialization and growth: A comparative study. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Temple J.R.W. (2001). Structural change and Europe’s golden age. University of Bristol Discussion Paper No. 01/519Google Scholar
  95. Temple J.R. W. (2004). Dualism and aggregate productivity. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4387Google Scholar
  96. Temple J.R.W. (2005). Dual economy models: A primer for growth economists. The Manchester School, 73(4): 435–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Temple J.R.W. (2006). Aggregate production functions and growth conomics. International Review of Applied Economics, 20(3): 301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Temple J.R.W., Voth H.-J. (1998). Human capital, equipment investment, and industrialization. European Economic Review, 42(7): 1343–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Temple J.R. W., & Woessmann L. (2005). Dualism and cross-country growth regressions. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5655Google Scholar
  100. Vollrath D. (2005). How important are dual economy effects for aggregate productivity? Manuscript, University of Houston.Google Scholar
  101. Wacziarg R. (2001). Structural convergence. Manuscript, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  102. Weil D.N. (2004). Economic growth. Boston, PearsonGoogle Scholar
  103. Weisdorf J.L. (2006). From domestic manufacture to industrial revolution: Long-run growth and agricultural development. Oxford Economic Papers, 58(2): 264–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. White H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix stimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. World Bank (1995). World development report. OUP, World Bank.Google Scholar
  106. World Bank (2002). World development indicators 2002 CD-ROM. Washington D.C., The World BankGoogle Scholar
  107. World Bank (2005). World development indicators, September 2005 Data obtained via ESDS International, MIMAS, University of Manchester, April 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.CEPRLondonUK
  3. 3.Ifo Institute for Economic ResearchMunichGermany
  4. 4.Ludwig-Maximilians-University MunichMunichGermany
  5. 5.CESifoMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations