Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 10–20 | Cite as

Calling Behavior and Sex Pheromone Release and Storage in the Moth Chloridea virescens

  • Stephen P. FosterEmail author
  • Karin G. Anderson
  • Jérôme Casas
Article

Abstract

Female moths release sex pheromone to attract mates. In most species, sex pheromone is produced in, and released from, a specific gland. In a previous study, we used empirical data and compartmental modeling to account for the major pheromone gland processes of female Chloridea virescens: synthesis, storage, catabolism and release; we found that females released little (20–30%) of their pheromone, with most catabolized. The recent publication of a new pheromone collection method led us to reinvestigate pheromone release and catabolism in C. virescens on the basis that our original study might have underestimated release rate (thereby overestimating catabolism) due to methodology and females not calling (releasing) continuously. Further we wished to compare pheromone storage/catabolism between calling and non-calling females. First, we observed calling intermittency of females. Then, using decapitated females, we used the new collection method, along with compartmental modeling, gland sampling and stable isotope labeling, to determine differences in pheromone release, catabolism and storage between (forced) simulated calling and non-calling females. We found, (i) intact 1 d females call intermittently; (ii) pheromone is released at a higher rate than previously determined, with simulations estimating that continuously calling females release ca. 70% of their pheromone (only 30% catabolized); (iii) extension (calling)/retraction of the ovipositor is a highly effective “on/off’ mechanism for release; (iv) both calling and non-calling females store most pheromone on or near the gland surface, but calling females catabolize less pheromone; (v) females are capable of producing and releasing pheromone very rapidly. Thus, not only is the moth pheromone gland efficient, in terms of the proportion of pheromone released Vs. catabolized, but it is highly effective at shutting on/off a high flux of pheromone for release.

Keywords

Pheromone gland Mass isotopomer distribution analysis Lepidoptera Biosynthesis Catabolism Titer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this work was provided by United States Department of Agriculture Hatch Project ND02388. We also thank the United States Department of Agriculture–National Institute of Food and Agriculture for an Instrument Grant, 2015-07238 contributing, in part, to the purchase of the GC/MS system.

References

  1. Allison JD, Cardé RT (eds) (2016a) Pheromone communication in moths: evolution, behavior and application. University of Caifornia Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison JD, Cardé RT (2016b) Variation in moth pheromone: causes and consequences. In: Allison JD, Cardé RT (eds) Pheromone communication in moths: evolution, behavior and application. University of California Press, Oakland, pp 25–41Google Scholar
  3. Almeida ÂA, Lima ER, Reis R Jr (2008) Pupal period affects calling behavior of the wheat moth, Pseudaletia sequax (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ethology 114:499–503.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01492.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendib A, Minet J (1998) Female pheromone glands in arctiidae (Lepidoptera). Evolution and phylogenetic significance Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences – Series III – Sciences de la Vie 321:1007–1014.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(99)80056-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjostad LB, Wolf WA, Roelofs WL (1987) Pheromone biosynthesis in lepidopterans: desaturation and chain shortening. In: Prestwich GD, Blomquist GJ (eds) Pheromone biochemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 77–120Google Scholar
  6. Chinkes DL, Aarsland A, Rosenblatt J, Wolfe RR (1996) Comparison of mass isotopomer dilution methods used to compute VLDL production in vivo. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 271:E373–E383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eltahlawy H, Buckner JS, Foster SP (2007) Evidence for two-step regulation of pheromone biosynthesis by the pheromone biosynthesis-activating neuropeptide in the moth Heliothis virescens. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 64:120–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foster SP (1993) Neural inactivation of sex pheromone production in mated lightbrown apple moths, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker). J Insect Physiol 39:267–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(93)90098-C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster SP (2016) Toward a quantitative paradigm for sex pheromone production in moths. In: Allison JD, Cardé RT (eds) Pheromone communication in moths: evolution, behavior, and application. University of California Press, Oakland, pp 113–126Google Scholar
  10. Foster S, Anderson K (2011) The use of mass isotopomer distribution analysis to quantify synthetic rates of sex pheromone in the moth Heliothis virescens. J Chem Ecol 37:1208–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foster SP, Anderson KG (2018) Differential pheromone sampling of the gland of female Heliothis virescens moths reveals glandular differences in composition and quantity. J Chem Ecol 44:452–462.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-018-0954-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster SP, Anderson KG (2019) Production and distribution of aldehyde and alcohol sex pheromone components in the pheromone gland of females of the moth Chloridea virescens. J Chem Ecol 45:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-018-1041-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster SP, Anderson KG, Casas J (2017) Sex pheromone in the moth Heliothis virescens is produced as a mixture of two pools: de novo and via precursor storage in glycerolipids. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 87:26–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.06.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster SP, Anderson KG, Casas J (2018) The dynamics of pheromone gland synthesis and release: a paradigm shift for understanding sex pheromone quantity in female moths. J Chem Ecol 44:525–533.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-018-0963-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Groot AT (2014) Circadian rhythms of sexual activities in moths: a review. Front Ecol Evol 2.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00043
  16. Hagström ÅK, Walther A, Wendland J, Löfstedt C (2013) Subcellular localization of the fatty acyl reductase involved in pheromone biosynthesis in the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 43:510–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.03.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heath RR, McLaughlin JR, Proshold F, Teal PEA (1991) Periodicity of female sex pheromone titer and release in Heliothis subflexa and H. virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 84:182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hellerstein MK, Neese RA (1992) Mass isotopomer distribution analysis: a technique for measuring biosynthesis and turnover of polymers. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 263:E988–E1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansson B, Jones T (2007) The role of chemical communication in mate choice. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 82:265–289.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00009.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jurenka RA (2003) Biochemistry of female moth sex pheromones. In: Blomquist GJ, Vogt RG (eds) Insect pheromone biochemistry and molecular biology. Elsevier, London, pp 53–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jurenka R (2017) Regulation of pheromone biosynthesis in moths. Curr Opin Insect Sci 24:29–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2017.09.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Löfstedt C, Wahlberg N, Millar JG (2016) Evolutionary patterns of pheromone diversity in Lepidoptera. In: Allison JD, Cardé RT (eds) Pheromone communication in moths: evolution, behavior and application. University of California Press, Oakland, pp 43–78Google Scholar
  23. Ma PWK, Ramaswamy SB (2003) Biology and ultrastructure of sex pheromone-producing tissue. In: Blomquist GJ, Vogt RC (eds) Insect pheromone biochemsitry and molecular biology. Elsevier, London, pp 19–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mackay D, van Wesenbeeck I (2014) Correlation of chemical evaporation rate with vapor pressure. Environ Sci Technol 48:10259–10263.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es5029074 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nojima S, Classen A, Groot AT, Schal C (2018) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of chemicals emitted from the pheromone gland of individual Heliothis subflexa females. PLoS One 13:e0202035.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202035 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Pope MM, Gaston LK, Baker TC (1982) Composition, quantification, and periodicity of sex pheromone gland volatiles from individual Heliothis virescens females. J Chem Ecol 8:1043–1055.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00987885 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Raina AK, Wergin WP, Murphy CA, Erbe EF (2000) Structural organization of the sex pheromone gland in Helicoverpa zea in relation to pheromone production and release. Arthropod Struct Dev 29:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Teal PEA, Tumlinson JH (1986) Terminal steps in pheromone biosynthesis by Heliothis virescens and H. zea. J Chem Ecol 12:353–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turgeon JJ, McNeil JN (1983) Modifications in the calling behaviour of Pseudaletia unipuncta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), induced by temperature conditions during pupal and adult development. Can Entomol 115:1015–1022.  https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent1151015-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Entomology, SNRSNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA
  2. 2.Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, IRBI-UMR CNRS 7261Université de ToursToursFrance

Personalised recommendations