Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 44, Issue 11, pp 1051–1057 | Cite as

Host Plant Suitability in a Specialist Herbivore, Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae): Preference, Performance and Sequestration

  • Lauren E. Bradley
  • Caitlin A. Kelly
  • M. Deane BowersEmail author


The checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae), specializes on plants containing iridoid glycosides and has the ability to sequester these compounds from its host plants. This study investigated larval preference, performance, and sequestration of iridoid glycosides in a population of E. anicia at Crescent Meadows, Colorado, USA. Although previous studies showed that other populations in Colorado use the host plant, Castilleja integra (Orobanchaceae), we found no evidence for E. anicia ovipositing or feeding on C. integra at Crescent Meadows. Though C. integra and another host plant, Penstemon glaber (Plantaginaceae), occur at Crescent Meadows, the primary host plant used was P. glaber. To determine why C. integra was not being used at the Crescent Meadows site, we first examined the host plant preference of naïve larvae between P. glaber and C. integra. Then we assessed the growth and survivorship of larvae reared on each plant species. Finally, we quantified the iridoid glycoside concentrations of the two plant species and diapausing caterpillars reared on each host plant. Our results showed that E. anicia larvae prefer P. glaber. Also, larvae survive and grow better when reared on P. glaber than on C. integra. Castilleja integra was found to contain two primary iridoid glycosides, macfadienoside and catalpol, and larvae reared on this plant sequestered both compounds; whereas P. glaber contained only catalpol and larvae reared on this species sequestered catalpol. Thus, although larvae are able to use C. integra in the laboratory, the drivers behind the lack of use at the Crescent Meadows site remain unclear.


Castilleja integra Penstemon glaber Iridoid glycosides Plant defense Host plant selection Population variation 



We thank Megan Blanchard, Adrian Carper and Toby Hammer, for comments on earlier versions of this paper. This work was supported by grants from the Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program, the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department at the University of Colorado, and the National Science Foundation (DEB 1407053 and IOS 1456354).


  1. Ali JG, Agrawal AA (2017) Trade-offs and tritrophic consequences of host shifts in specialized root herbivores. Funct Ecol 31:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernays EA (2001) Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Annu Rev Entomol 46:703–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers MD, Collinge SK (1992) Fate of iridoid glycosides in different life stages of the buckeye, Junonia coenia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). J Chem Ecol 18:817–831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers MD, Farley S (1990) The behavior of grey jays, Perisoreus canadensis, towards palatable and unpalatable Lepidoptera. Anim Behav 39:699–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowers MD, Stamp N, Collinge S (1992) Early stage of host range expansion by a specialist herbivore Euphydryas phaeton (Nymphalidae). Ecology 72:526–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrasco D, Larsson MC, Anderson P (2015) Insect host plant selection in complex environments. Curr Op Insect Sci 8:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen JA, Brower LP (1982) Oviposition and larval success of wild monarch butterflies (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) in relation to host plant size and cardenolide concentration. J Kansas Entomol Soc 55:343–348Google Scholar
  8. Damtoft S (1993) Biosynthesis of catalpol. Phytochemistry 35:1187–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dethier VG (1954) Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. Evolution 8:33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eaton K, Karban R (2014) Effects of trichomes on the behavior and distribution of Platyprepia virginalis caterpillars. Entomol Exp Appl 151:144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fordyce J, Agrawal A (2001) The role of plant trichomes and caterpillar group size on growth and defense of the pipevine swallowtail Battus philenor. J Anim Ecol 70:997–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox LR, Morrow PA (1981) Specialization: species property or local phenomenon? Science 211:887–893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner DR, Stermitz FR (1988) Host plant utilization and iridoid glycoside sequestration by Euphydryas anicia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Chem Ecol 12:47–2168Google Scholar
  14. Gripenberg S, Mayhew PJ, Parnell M, Roslin T (2010) A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol Lett 13:383–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey JA, Van Nouhuys S, Biere A (2004) Effects of quantitative variation in allelochemicals in Plantago lanceolata on development of a generalist and a specialist herbivore and their endoparasites. J Chem Ecol 31:297–302Google Scholar
  16. Holdren C, Ehrlich P (1982) Ecological determinants of food plant choice in the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha in Colorado. Oecologia 52:417–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelly C, Bowers MD (2016) Preference and performance of generalist and specialist herbivores on chemically defended host plants. Ecol Entomol 41:308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2002) Manduca quinquemaculata’s optimization of intra-plant oviposition to predation, food quality, and thermal constraints. Ecology 83:2346–2354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mead E, Foderaro T, Gardner D, Stermitz F (1993) Iridoid glycoside sequestration by Thessalia leanira (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) feeding on Castilleja integra (Scrophulariaceae). J Chem Ecol 19:1155–1166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Meiners T (2015) Chemical ecology and evolution of plant-insect interactions: a multitrophic perspective. Curr Op Insect Sci 8:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murphy SM (2004) Enemy free space maintains swallowtail butterfly host shift. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:18048–18052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Nieminen M, Suomi J, Van Nouhuys S, Sauri P, Riekkola M-L (2003) Effect of iridoid glycoside content on oviposition host plant choice and parasitism in a specialist herbivore. J Chem Ecol 29:823–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Prudic KL, Oliver JC, Bowers MD (2005) Soil nutrient effects on oviposition preference, larval performance, and chemical defense of a specialist insect herbivore. Oecologia 143:578–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rausher MD (1980) Host abundance, juvenile survival, and oviposition preference in Battus philenor. Evolution 34:342–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schädler M, Roeder M, Brandl R, Matthies D (2005) Is palatability of root-hemiparasitic plant influenced by its host plant species? Oecologia 146:227–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Scott JA (1986) Butterflies of North America a natural history and field guide. Stanford University Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  28. Scriber J, Larsen M, Allen G, Walker P, Zalucki M (2008) Interactions between Papilionidae and ancient Australian angiosperms: evolutionary specialization or ecological monophagy? Entomol Exp Appl 128:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singer MC (2004) Measurement, correlates and importance of oviposition preference in the life of checkerspots. In: Ehrlich PR, Hanski I (eds) On the wings of checkerspots: a model system for population biology, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 112–160Google Scholar
  30. Singer MC, Parmesan C (1993) Sources of variations in patterns of plant-insect association. Nature 361:251–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singer MC, Ng D, Thomas CD (1988) Heritability of oviposition preference and its relationship to offspring performance within a single insect population. Evolution 42:977–985CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Singer MC, Rodrigues D, Stireman JO III, Carriere Y (2004) Roles of food quality and enemy-free space in host use by a generalist insect herbivore. Ecology 85:2747–2753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stermitz FR, Gardner DR, Odendall FJ, Ehrlich PR (1986) Euphydrayas anicia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) utilization of iridoid glycosides from Castilleja and Besseya (Scrophulariaceae) host plants. J Chem Ecol 12:1459–1468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stermitz FR, Abdel-kader MS, Foderara TA, Pomeroy M (1994) Iridoid glycosides from some butterflies and their larval food plants. Phytochemistry 37:997–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Talsma J, Biere A, Harvey J, Nouhuys S (2008) Oviposition cues for a specialist butterfly-plant chemistry and size. J Chem Ecol 34:1202–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas C, Singer M (1998) Scale dependent evolution of specialization in a checkerspot butterfly; from individuals to metapopulations and ecotypes. In S Mopper, S Strauss (ed) Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural insect populations, Chapman and Hall, pp 343–374Google Scholar
  37. Thompson J (1988) Variation in preference and specificity in monophagous and oligophagous swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 42:118–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson J (2008) Coevolution, cryptic speciation, and the persistence of interations. In: Tilmon KJ (ed) Specialization, speciation, and radiation. University of California Press, pp 216–214Google Scholar
  39. Westoby M, Falster D, Moles A, Vesk P, Wright I (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. White RR (1979) Foodplants of alpine Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae). J Lepid Soc 33:170–173Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 334 UCBUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and University of Colorado Museum, 334 UCBUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations