Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 814–820 | Cite as

Airborne Monoterpenes Emitted from a Cupressus lusitanica Cell Culture Induce a Signaling Cascade that Produces β-Thujaplicin

  • Koki Fujita
  • Ryo Kambe
  • Ransika De Alwis
  • Tatsuya Yagi
  • Yuji Tsutsumi
Article
  • 144 Downloads

Abstract

A cell culture of Cupressus lusitanica was used to investigate the reaction of a plant to certain airborne chemicals. Compared with laboratory and field methods using intact plants or tissues, a cell culture is advantageous because it is not affected by environmental factors, and the experiments are easier to reproduce. When exposed to an elicitor, our cell line produces 10 monoterpenes and β-thujaplicin, which is a strong phytoalexin. These monoterpenes are emitted into the vapor phase and are expected to play a role in airborne signaling. In the present study, the cells were exposed to monoterpene vapors, and the volatiles present in the culture flasks were monitored. When the culture cells were exposed to low doses of sabinene, we detected γ-terpinene and p-cymene. After exposure to γ-terpinene, we found p-cymene and terpinolene, whereas p-cymene exposure resulted in terpinolene emission. By contrast, the other seven monoterpenes we investigated did not induce any emissions of other monoterpenes. These results strongly suggest that in C. lusitanica a signaling cascade exists that starts with the emission of sabinene and moves to γ-terpinene, p-cymene, and finally to terpinolene, which accelerates the production of the phytoalexin β-thujaplicin.

Keywords

Monoterpene Airborne signaling Cell culture Cupressus lusitanica β-thujaplicin 

References

  1. Adams RP (2001) Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/quadrupole mass spectroscopy. Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol StreamGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA (2000) Mechanisms, ecological consequences and agricultural implications of tri-trophic interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:329–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alwis RD, Fujita K, Ashitani T, Kuroda K (2009a) Volatile and non-volatile monoterpenes produced by elicitor-stimulated Cupressus lusitanica cultured cells. J Plant Physiol 166:720–728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alwis RD, Fujita K, Ashitani T, Kuroda K (2009b) Induced monoterpene and lignin production in mechanically stressed and fungal elicited cultured Cupressus lusitanica cells. Plant Biotechnol Rep 3:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arimura G, Ozawa R, Shimoda T, Nishioka T, Boland W, Takabayashi J (2000) Herbivory-induced volatiles elicit defence genes in lima bean leaves. Nature 406:512–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Arimura G, Ozawa R, Horiuchi J, Nishioka T, Takabayashi J (2001) Plant–plant interactions mediated by volatiles emitted from plants infested by spider mites. Biochem Syst Ecol 29:1049–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baldwin IT, Schultz JC (1983) Rapid changes in tree leaf chemistry induced by damage: evidence for communication between plants. Science 221:277–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldwin T, Halitschke R, Paschold A, von Dahl CC, Preston CA (2006) Volatile signaling in plant-plant interactions: “talking trees” in the genomics era. Science 311:812–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruin J, Sabelis MW, Dicke M (1995) Do plant tap SOS signals from their infested neighbours? Trees 10:167–170Google Scholar
  10. Collin HA (2001) Secondary product formation in plant tissue cultures. Plant Growth Regul 34:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dick M, Bruin J (2001) Chemical information transfer between plants: back to the future. Biochem Syst Ecol 10:981–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dicke M, van Poecke RMP, de Boer JG (2003) Inducible indirect defence of plants: from mechanisms to ecological functions. Basic Appl Ecol 4:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engelberth J, Alborn HT, Schmelz EA, Tumlinson JH (2004) Airborne signals prime plants against insect herbivore attack. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:1781–1785CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Fineschi S, Loreto F (2012) Leaf volatile isoprenoids: an important defensive armament in forest tree species. iForest – Biogeosciences and Forestry 5:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frost JC, Appel HM, Carlson JE, De Moraes CM, Mesher MC, Schltz JC (2007) Within-plant signaling via volatiles overcomes vascular constrains on systemic signaling and primes responses against herbivores. Ecol Lett 10:490–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fujita K, Yamaguchi T, Itose R, Sakai K (2000) Biosynthetic pathway of β-thujaplicin in the Cupressus lusitanica cell culture. J Plant Physiol 156:462–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fujita K, Bunyu Y, Kuroda K, Ashitani T, Shigeto J, Tsutsumi Y (2014) A novel synthetic pathway for tropolone ring formation via the olefin monoterpene intermediate terpinolene in cultured Cupressus lusitanica cells. J Plant Physiol 171:610–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Godarda KA, Whitec R, Bohlmann J (2008) Monoterpene-induced molecular responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 69:1838–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heil M, Bueno SJCS (2007) Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defence in nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:5467–5472CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Heil M, Karban R (2009) Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signaling. Trends Ecol Evol 25:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heil M, Ton J (2008) Long distance signalling in plant defence. Trends Plant Sci 13:264–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Heil M, Lion U, Boland W (2008) Defence-inducing volatiles: in search of the active motif. J Chem Ecol 34:601–604CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Inada S, Tsutsumi Y, Sakai K (1993) Elicitor of the β-thujaplicin accumulation in callus cultures of Cupressus lusitanica. J Fac Agr Kyushu U 38:119–126Google Scholar
  25. Itose R, Sakai K (1997) Improved culture conditions for the production of β-thujaplicin by suspension cell cultures of Cupressus lusitanica. Plant Biotechnol 14:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karban R, Baldwin IT, Baxter KJ, Laue G, Felton GW (2000) Communication between plants: induced resistance in wild tobacco plants following clipping of neighboring sagebrush. Oecologia 125:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katoh S, Noda A, Furuno T (2006) Tree-to-tree and clone-to-clone variation of monoterpene emitted from needles of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtuse. J Wood Sci 52:84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kost C, Heil M (2006) Herbivore-induced plant volatiles induce an indirect defence in neighboring plants. J Ecol 94:619–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lange BM, Trost M, Heller W, Langebartels C, Sandermann H Jr. (1994) Elicitor-induced formation of free and cell-wall-bound stilbenes in cell-suspension cultures of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L. Planta 194:143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matsunaga Y, Fujita K, Yamada J, Ashitani T, Sakai K (2003) Monoterpenes produced by Cupressus lusitanica cultured cells including a novel monoterpene (1S, 2S, S)-(+)-1,6-epoxy-4(8)-p-menthen-2-ol. Nat Prod Res 17:441–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Muroi A, Ramadan A, Nishihara M, Yamamoto M, Ozawa R, Takabayashi J, Arimura G-I (2011) The composite effect of transgenic plant volatiles for acquired immunity to herbivory caused by inter-plant communications. PLoS One 6:e24594CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Paré PW, Tumlinson JH (1999) Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores. Plant Physiol 121:325–331CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Park SW, Kaimoyo E, Kumar D, Mosher S, Klessig DF (2007) Methyl salicylate is a critical mobile signal for plant systemic acquired resistance. Science 318:113–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Paschold A, Halitschke R, Baldwin IT (2006) Using ‘mute’ plants to translate volatile signals. Plant J 45:275–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Peng J, van Loon JJA, Zheng S, Dicke M (2011) Herbivore-induced volatiles of cabbage (Brassica oleracea) prime defence responses in neighbouring intact plants. Plant Biol 13:276–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Popp MP, Lensney MS, Davis JM (1997) Defence responses elicited in pine cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 47:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rhoades DF (1983) Responses of alder and willow to attack by tent caterpillars and webworms: evidence for pheromonal sensitivity of willows. In: Hedin PA (ed) Plant resistance to insects. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp. 55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodriguez-Soana CR, Mescher MC, Moraes CM (2013) The role of volatiles in plant-plant interactions. In: Balusuka F (ed) Long-distance systematic signaling and communication in plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 393–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sakai K, Kusaba K, Tsutsumi Y, Shiraishi T (1994) Secondary metabolites in cell-culture of woody-plants 3. Formation of β-thujaplicin in Cupressus lusitanica callus-cultures treated with fungal elicitors. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 40:1–5Google Scholar
  40. Ton J, D’Alessandro M, Jourdie V, Jakab G, Karlen D, Held M, Mauch-Mani B, Turlings TCJ (2006) Priming by airborne signals boosts direct and indirect resistance in maize. Plant J 49:16–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yamaguchi T, Fujita K, Sakai K (1999) Biological activity of extracts from Cupressus lusitanica cell culture. J Wood Sci 45:170–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yildizhan S, Schulz S (2011) Easy access to (E)-β-ocimene. Synlett 19:2831–2833Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Technical EducationNational Institute of EducationMaharagamaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations