Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 41, Issue 10, pp 948–955 | Cite as

How Does Garlic Mustard Lure and Kill the West Virginia White Butterfly?

  • Samantha L. Davis
  • Tina Frisch
  • Nanna Bjarnholt
  • Don Cipollini


As it pertains to insect herbivores, the preference-performance hypothesis posits that females will choose oviposition sites that maximize their offspring’s fitness. However, both genetic and environmental cues contribute to oviposition preference, and occasionally “oviposition mistakes” occur, where insects oviposit on hosts unsuitable for larval development. Pieris virginiensis is a pierine butterfly native to North America that regularly oviposits on an invasive plant, Alliaria petiolata, but the caterpillars are unable to survive. Alliaria petiolata has high concentrations of the glucosinolate sinigrin in its tissues, as well as a hydroxynitrile glucoside, alliarinoside. We investigated sinigrin as a possible cause of mistake oviposition, and sinigrin and alliarinoside as possible causes of larval mortality. We found that sinigrin applied to leaves of Cardamine diphylla, a major host of P. virginiensis that does not produce sinigrin, had no effect on oviposition rates. We tested the effect of sinigrin on larval performance using two host plants, one lacking sinigrin (C. diphylla) and one with sinigrin naturally present (Brassica juncea). We found no effect of sinigrin application on survival of caterpillars fed C. diphylla, but sinigrin delayed pupation and decreased pupal weight. On B. juncea, sinigrin decreased survival, consumption, and caterpillar growth. We also tested the response of P. virginiensis caterpillars to alliarinoside, a compound unique to A. petiolata, which was applied to B. oleracea. We found a significant reduction in survival, leaf consumption, and caterpillar size when alliarinoside was consumed. The ‘novel weapon’ alliarinoside likely is largely responsible for larval failure on the novel host A. petiolata. Sinigrin most likely contributes to the larval mortality observed, however, we did not observe any effect of sinigrin on oviposition by P. virginiensis females. Further research needs to be done on non-glucosinolate contact cues, and volatile signals that may induce P. virginiensis oviposition.


Alliaria petiolata Novel plant-insect interactions Oviposition mistake Pieris virginiensis Preference-performance hypothesis 



We gratefully acknowledge the many people involved in conducting this research. Many thanks to Birger Lindberg Møller, Mohammed Saddik Motawia, and colleagues who provided the alliarinoside for this research; Tom LeBlanc and Pete Woods for help in site selection; and many others for advice, field, and lab help, and funding. Funding for this work came primarily from Wright State University’s Graduate Student Association and the Ohio Plant Biotechnology Consortium.


  1. Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics 11:36–42Google Scholar
  2. Agerbirk N, Chew FS, Olsen CE, Jørgenson K (2010a) Leaf and floral parts feeding by orange tip butterfly larvae depends on larval position but not on glucosinolate profile or nitrogen level. J Chem Ecol 36:1335–1345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Agerbirk N, Olsen CE, Chew FS, Ørgaard M (2010b) Variable glucosinolate profiles of Cardamine pratensis (Brassicaceae) with equal chromosome numbers. J Agric Food Chem 58:4693–4700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barto E, Powell J, Cipollini D (2010) How novel are the chemical weapons of garlic mustard in North American forest understories? Biol Invasions 12:3465–3471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beltman JB, Haccou P, Ten Cate C (2004) Learning and colonization of new niches: a first step toward speciation. Evolution 58:35–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berenbaum M (1981) An oviposition “mistake” by Papilio glaucus (Papilionidae). J Lepid Soc 35:75Google Scholar
  7. Bess J (2005) Conservation assessment for the West Virginia White (Pieris virginiensis Edwards).
  8. Bjarnholt N, Møller BL (2008) Hydroxynitrile glucosides. Phytochemistry 69:1947–1961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowers M, Schmitt J (2013) Overcrowding leads to lethal oviposition mistakes in the Baltimore checkerspot, Euphydryas phaeton Drury (Nymphalidae). J Lepid Soc 67:227–229Google Scholar
  10. Chew F (1977) Coevolution of Pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. II. The distribution of eggs on potential foodplants. Evolution 31:568–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cipollini D, Gruner B (2007) Cyanide in the chemical arsenal of garlic mustard, Alliaria petiolata. J Chem Ecol 33:85–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Courant A, Holbrook A, Van der Reijden E, Chew F (1994) Native pierine butterfly (Pieridae) adapting to naturalized cruicifer? J Lepid Soc 48:168–170Google Scholar
  13. Davis SL, Cipollini D (2014a) Do mothers always know best? Oviposition mistakes and resulting larval failure of Pieris virginiensis on Alliaria petiolata, a novel, toxic host. Biol Invasions 16:1941–1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis SL, Cipollini D (2014b) How environmental conditions and changing landscapes influence the survival and reproduction of a rare butterfly, pieris virginiensis (Pieridae). J Lepid Soc 68(1):61–65Google Scholar
  15. Eilers S, Pettersson LB, Öckinger E (2013) Micro-climate determines oviposition site selection and abundance in the butterfly Pyrgus armoricanus at its northern range margin. Ecol Entomol 38:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feeny P, Rosenberry L (1982) Seasonal variation in the glucosinolate content of North America Brassica nigra and Dentaria species. Biochem Syst Ecol 10:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finnell A, Lehn C (2007) West Virginia White Butterfly Conservation Plan. 1–14.
  18. Fox C (1993) A quantitative genetic analysis of oviposition preference and larval performance on two hosts in the Bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Evolution 47:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frerigmann H, Böttcher C, Baatout D, Gigolashvili T (2012) Glucosinolates are produced in trichomes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 3:242PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Frisch T, Agerbirk N, Davis S, Cipollini D, Olsen CE, Motawia MS, Bjarnholt N, Møller BL (2014) Glucosinolate-related glucosides in Alliaria petiolata: sources of variation in the plant and different metabolism in an adapted specialist herbivore, Pieris rapae. J Chem Ecol 40:1063–1079CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gripenberg S, Mayhew PJ, Parnell M, Roslin T (2010) A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol Lett 13:383–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Halkier BA, Gershenzon J (2006) Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:303–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Haribal M, Renwick JAA (1998) Isovitexin 6″-O-B-d-glucopyranoside: a feeding deterrent to Pieris napi oleracea from Alliaria petiolata. Phytochemistry 47:1237–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haribal M, Renwick JAA (2001) Seasonal and population variation in flavonoid and alliarinoside content of Alliaria petiolata. J Chem Ecol 27:1585–1594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Haribal M, Yang Z, Attygalle A, Renwick JAA, Meinwald J (2001) A cyanoallyl glucoside from Alliaria petiolata, as a feeding deterrent for larvae of Pieris napi oleracea. J Nat Prod 64:440–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang X, Renwick JAA (1994) Relative activities of glucosinolates as oviposition stimulants for Pieris rapae and P. napi oleracea. J Chem Ecol 20:1025–1037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang X, Renwick JAA, Sachdev-Gupta K (1993) Oviposition stimulants and deterrents regulating differential acceptance of Iberis amara by Pieris rapae and P. napi oleracea. J Chem Ecol 19:1645–1663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuchernig JC, Burow M, Wittstock U (2012) Evolution of specifier proteins in glucosinolate-containing plants. BMC Evol Biol 12:127PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Montaut S, Bleeker RS (2011) Cardamine sp.—a review on its chemical and bioligical profiles. Chem Biodivers 8:955–975CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Montaut S, Bleeker RS (2013) Review on Cardamine diphylla (Michx) A. wood (Brassicaceae): Ethnobotany and glucosinolate chemistry. J Ethnopharmacol 149:401–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Montaut S, Bleeker R, Jacques C (2010) Phytochemical constituents of Cardamine diphylla. Can J Chem 88:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakajima M, Boggs CL, Bailey S, Reithel J, Paape T (2013) Fitness costs of butterfly oviposition on a lethal non-native plant in a mixed native and non-native plant community. Oecologia 172:823–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielsen J, Dalgaard L, Larsen LM, Sorenson H (1979) Host plant selection of the horse-radish flea beetle Phyllotreta amroraciae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): feeding responses to glucosinolates from several crucifers. Entomol Exp Appl 25:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nylin S, Janz N (2007) Butterfly host plant range: an example of plasticity as a promoter of speciation? Evol Ecol 23:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olafsdottir ES, Jorgensen LB, Jaroszewski JW (2002) Cyanogenesis in glucosinolate-producing plants: carica papaya and Carica quercifolia. Phytochemistry 60:269–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Olsen CE, Møller BL, Motawia MS (2014) Synthesis of the allelochemical alliarinoside present in garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), an invasive plant species in North America. Carbohydr Res 394:13–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Porter A (1994) Implications of introduced garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in the habitat of Pieris virginiensis (Pieridae). J Lepid Soc 48:7–8Google Scholar
  38. Renwick JAA, Radke C (1988) Sensory cues in host selection for oviposition by the cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae. J Insect Physiol 34:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Renwick JAA, Zhang W, Haribal M, Attygale AB, Lopez KD (2001) Dual chemical barriers protect a plant against different larval stages of an insect. J Chem Ecol 27:1575–1583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sang J, Minchinton I, Johnstone P, Truscott R (1984) Glucosinolate profiles in the seed, root and leaf tissue of cabbage, mustard, rapeseed, radish and swede. Can J Plant Sci 93:77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Singer M, Ng D, Thomas C (1988) Heritability of oviposition preference and its relationship to offspring performance within a single insect population. Evolution 42:977–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Städler E, Reifenrath K (2009) Glucosinolates on the leaf surface perceived by insect herbivores: review of ambiguous results and new investigations. Phytochem Rev 8:207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stauber E, Kuczka P, Van Ohlen M, Vogt B (2012) Turning the “mustard oil bomb”into a “cyanide bomb”: aromatic glucosinolate metabolism in a specialist insect herbivore. PLoS One 7, e35545PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Stefanescu C, Jubany J, Dantart J (2006) Egg–laying by the butterfly Iphiclides podalirius (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) on alien plants: a broadening of host range or oviposition mistakes? Anim Biodivers Conserv 29:83–90Google Scholar
  45. Straatman R (1962) Notes on certain Lepidoptera ovipositing on plants which are toxic to their larvae. J Lepid Soc 16:99–103Google Scholar
  46. Thompson J (1988) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol Exp Appl 47:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thompson JN, Pellmyr O (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 36:65–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tong M, Shapiro A (1989) Genetic differentiation among California populations of the anise swallowtail butterfly, Papilio zelicaon Lucas. J Lepid Soc 43:217–228Google Scholar
  49. Walker KS, Bray JL, Lehman ME, Lentz-Ronning AJ (2014) Effects of host plant phenolic acids and nutrient status on oviposition and feeding of the cabbage white butterfly, Pieris rapae. Bios 85:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wheat C, Vogel H, Wittstock U, Braby MF, Underwood D, Mitchell-Olds T (2007) The genetic basis of a plant-insect coevolutionary key innovation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:20427–20431PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wittstock U, Burow M (2007) Tipping the Scales - Specifier proteins in glucosinolate hydrolysis. IUBMB Life 59:744–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wittstock U, Agerbirk N, Stauber EJ, Olsen CE, Hipples M, Mitchell-Olds T, Gershenzon J, Vogel H (2004) Successful herbivore attack due to metabolic diversion of a plant chemical defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:4859–4864PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samantha L. Davis
    • 1
  • Tina Frisch
    • 2
  • Nanna Bjarnholt
    • 2
  • Don Cipollini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesWright State UniversityDaytonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant and Environmental SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations