Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 41, Issue 7, pp 622–630 | Cite as

Herbivory Increases Fruit Set in Silene latifolia: A Consequence of Induced Pollinator-Attracting Floral Volatiles?

  • Salvatore CozzolinoEmail author
  • Silvia Fineschi
  • Maria Litto
  • Giovanni Scopece
  • Judith Trunschke
  • Florian P. Schiestl
Article

Abstract

Although the effect of herbivory on plant reproduction has been investigated in some detail, little is known about how herbivores affect floral signalling. Here, we investigated the effect of foliar herbivory by the African Cotton Leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis) on floral signalling and fruit set in the White Campion (Silene latifolia). We found no effects of herbivory on floral traits involved in visual signalling (flower number, corolla diameter, calyx length, petal length) or in amount of nectar produced. However, Spodoptera-infested plants emitted higher amounts of the two floral volatiles, (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate and β-ocimene, than control plants. Open pollinated, infested plants also were found to produce more fruits than control plants, but only with nocturnal pollinators. Experimental addition of the two induced floral volatiles to non-infested Silene flowers also led to the production of more fruits with nocturnal pollination. This suggests that higher fruit production in herbivore-infested plants was caused by increased nocturnal pollinator attraction, mediated by the induced floral emission of these two volatiles. Our results show that the effects of herbivory on plant reproductive success are not necessarily detrimental, as plants can compensate herbivory with increased investment in pollinator attraction.

Keywords

Pollination Herbivory Flower scent Volatiles 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Anna Salatiello and Giovanna Dati for help with conducting experiments. David Carrasco from Swedish University of Agricultural Science provided the Spodoptera larvae used in this study. This research was funded by the CRN-InvaVol grant and POR-Campania BIP to SC and SF and by Swiss National Science Funds (SNF/ESF grant no. 31VL30_134416 to FPS, embedded in the Eurocores Invavol program).

Supplementary material

10886_2015_597_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Online Resource 1 (DOCX 12 kb)
10886_2015_597_MOESM2_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Online Resource 2 (DOCX 14 kb)
10886_2015_597_MOESM3_ESM.docx (238 kb)
Online Resource 3 (DOCX 238 kb)

References

  1. Abdala-Roberts L, Parra-Tabla V, Navarro J (2007) Is floral longevity influenced by reproductive costs and pollination success in Cohniella ascendens (Orchidaceae)? Ann Bot 100:1367–1371PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel C, Clauss M, Schaub A, Gershenzon J, Tholl D (2009) Floral and insect-induced volatile formation in Arabidopsis lyrata ssp. petraea, a perennial, outcrossing relative of A. thaliana. Planta 230:1–11PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler LS, Wink M, Distl M, Lentz AJ (2006) Leaf herbivory and nutrients increase nectar alkaloids. Ecol Lett 9:960–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agrawal AA (2011a) Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Funct Ecol 25:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agrawal AA (2011b) New synthesis-trade-offs in chemical ecology. J Chem Ecol 37:230–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber NA, Adler LS, Theis N, Hazzard RV, Kiers ET (2012) Herbivory reduces plant interactions with above- and belowground antagonists and mutualists. Ecology 93:1560–1570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belsky AJ (1986) Does herbivory benefit plants? A review of the evidence. Am Nat 127:870–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergelson J, Crawley MJ (1992) Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: the disadvantages of being eaten. Am Nat 139:870–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergelson J, Juenger T, Crawley MJ (1996) Regrowth following herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: compensation but not overcompensation. Am Nat 148:744–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruinsma M, Lucas-Barbosa D, ten Broeke CJ, van Dam NM, van Beek TA, Dicke M, van Loon JJ (2014) Folivory affects composition of nectar, floral odor and modifies pollinator behavior. J Chem Ecol 40:39–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brys R, Shefferson RP, Jacquemyn H (2011) Impact of herbivory on flowering behaviour and life history trade-offs in a polycarpic herb: a 10-year experiment. Oecologia 166:293–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CABI/EPPO (1997) Quarantine pests for Europe, 2nd edn. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell SA, Kessler A (2013) Plant mating system transitions drive the macroevolution of defense strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(10):3973–3978PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dicke M, Van Beek TA, Posthumus MA, Dom NB, Van Bokhoven H, De Groot AE (1990) Isolation and identification of volatile kairomone that affects acarine predator–prey interactions. Involvement of host plant in its production. J Chem Ecol 16:381–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dötterl S, Jürgens A, Seifert K, Laube T, Weissbecker B, Schutz S (2006) Nursery by a moth in Silene latifolia: the role of odours in eliciting antennal and behavioural responses. New Phytol 169:707–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dufaÿ M, Anstett MC (2003) Conflicts between plants and pollinators that reproduce within inflorescences: evolutionary variations on a theme. Oikos 100:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elmqvist T, Gardfjell H (1988) Differences in response to defoliation between males and females of Silene dioica. Oecologia 77:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. El-Sayed AM, Suckling DM, Byers JA, Jang EB, Wearing CH (2009) Potential of “lure and kill” in long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species. J Econ Entomol 102:815–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elzinga JA, Biere A, Harvey JA (2002) The rearing of the gregarious koinobiont endoparasitoid Microplitis tristis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on its natural host Hadena bicruris (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Proc Exp Appl Entomol 13:109–115Google Scholar
  20. Freeman RS, Brody AK, Neefus CD (2003) Flowering phenology and compensation for herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 136:394–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G (1996) Reproduction and pollination in central European populations of Silene and Saponaria species. Bot Acta 109:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2001) Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291:2141–2144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kessler A, Halitschke R (2009) Testing the potential for conflicting selection on floral chemical traits by pollinators and herbivores: predictions and case study. Funct Ecol 23:901–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kessler A, Halitschke R, Poveda K (2011) Herbivory-mediated pollinator limitation: negative impacts of induced volatiles on plant-pollinator interactions. Ecology 92:1769–1780PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lehtila K, Strauss SY (1997) Leaf damage by herbivores affects attractiveness to pollinators in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 111:396–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lloyd DG (1980) Sexual strategies in plants 1. A hypothesis of serial adjustment of maternal investment during 1 reproductive session. New Phytol 86:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lohman DJ, Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (1996) Impact of floral herbivory by parsnip webworm (Oecophoridae: Depressaria pastinacella Duponchel) on pollination and fitness of wild parsnip (Apiaceae, Pastinaca sativa L.). Am Midl Nat 136:407–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lucas-Barbosa D, van Loon JJA, Gols R, van Beek TA, Dicke M (2013) Reproductive escape: annual plant responds to butterfly eggs by accelerating seed production. Funct Ecol 27:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marquis RJ (1992) The selective impact of herbivores. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Illinois, pp 301–325Google Scholar
  30. Pareja M, Qvarfordt E, Webster B, Mayon P, Pickett J, Birkett M, Glinwood R (2012) Herbivory by a phloem-feeding insect inhibits floral volatile production. PLoS ONE 7, e31971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031971 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pichersky E, Gershenzon J (2002) The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defense. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:237–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Poveda K, Steffan-Dewenter I, Scheu S, Tscharntke T (2003) Effects of below- and above-ground herbivores on plant growth, flower visitation and seed set. Oecologia 135:601–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poveda K, Steffan-Dewenter I, Scheu S, Tscharntke T (2005) Floral trait expression and plant fitness in response to below- and aboveground plant-animal interactions. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raguso RA (2008) Wake up and smell the roses: the ecology and evolution of floral scent. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:549–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reekie E, Bazzaz F (2005) Reproductive allocation in plants. Elsevier Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  36. Reichman OJ, Smith SC (1991) Responses to simulated leaf and root herbivory by biennial, Tragopogon dubius. Ecology 72:116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schiestl FP (2010) The evolution of floral scent and insect chemical communication. Ecol Lett 13:1643–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schiestl FP, Kirk H, Bigler L, Cozzolino S, Desurmont G (2014) Herbivory and floral signalling: phenotypic plasticity and trade-offs between reproduction and indirect defence. New Phytol 203:257–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seybold S (1990) Caryophyllaceae. In: Sebald O, Seybold S, Philippi G (eds) Die Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Baden-Württembergs. Band 1. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 368–466Google Scholar
  40. Strauss SY, Conner JK, Rush SL (1996) Foliar herbivory affects floral characters and plant attractiveness to pollinators: implications for male and female plant fitness. Am Nat 147:1098–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA, Irwin RE (2002) Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 17:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Young HJ (2002) Diurnal and nocturnal pollination of Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae). Am J Bot 89:433–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolfe LM, Elzinga JA, Biere A (2004) Increased susceptibility to enemies following introduction in the invasive plant Silene latifolia. Ecol Lett 7:813–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (2009) Effects of florivory on floral volatile emissions and pollination success in the wild parsnip. Arthropod Plant Int 3:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvatore Cozzolino
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Silvia Fineschi
    • 1
  • Maria Litto
    • 2
  • Giovanni Scopece
    • 1
    • 2
  • Judith Trunschke
    • 3
    • 4
  • Florian P. Schiestl
    • 3
  1. 1.Consiglio Nazionale delle RicercheInstitute for Sustainable Plant ProtectionSesto FiorentinoItaly
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity Federico II, Complesso Universitario MSANaplesItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Systematic BotanyUniversity of ZürichZürichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Plant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology CentreUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations