Field Evaluation of the Bacterial Volatile Derivative 3-Pentanol in Priming for Induced Resistance in Pepper
- 888 Downloads
Plants are defended from attack by emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that can act directly against pathogens and herbivores or indirectly by recruiting natural enemies of herbivores. However, microbial VOC have been less investigated as potential triggers of plant systemic defense responses against pathogens in the field. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain IN937a, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium that colonizes plant tissues, stimulates induced systemic resistance (ISR) via its emission of VOCs. We investigated the ISR capacity of VOCs and derivatives collected from strain IN937a against bacterial spot disease caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria in pepper. Of 15 bacterial VOCs and their derivatives, 3-pentanol, which is a C8 amyl alcohol reported to be a component of sex pheromones in insects, was selected for further investigation. Pathogens were infiltrated into pepper leaves 10, 20, 30, and 40 days after treatment and transplantation to the field. Disease severity was assessed 7 days after transplantation. Treatment with 3-pentanol significantly reduced disease severity caused by X. axonopodis and naturally occurring Cucumber mosaic virus in field trials over 2 years. We used quantitative real-time polymerase chain analysis to examine Pathogenesis-Related genes associated with salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene defense signaling. The expression of Capsicum annuum Pathogenesis-Related protein 1 (CaPR1), CaPR2, and Ca protease inhibitor2 (CaPIN2) increased in field-grown pepper plants treated with 3-pentanol. Taken together, our results show that 3-pentanol triggers induced resistance by priming SA and JA signaling in pepper under field conditions.
Keywords3-Pentanol Pepper Defense priming ISR PGPR Systemic acquired resistance Volatile organic compound
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
Induced systemic resistance
Volatile organic compound
We thank Dr. Doil Choi for providing the bacterial X. axonopodis strain. Financial support was obtained from the Industrial Source Technology Development Program of the Ministry of Knowledge Economy (10044909) of Korea, the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (SSAC grant #PJ009524), Rural Development Administration, S. Korea, and the KRIBB initiative program, South Korea.
- Conrath U, Beckers GJ, Flors V, García-Agustín P, Jakab G, Mauch F, Newman MA, Pieterse CM, Poinssot B, Pozo MJ (2006) Priming: getting ready for battle. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:1062–1071Google Scholar
- Davis TS, Crippen TL, Hofstetter RW, Tomberlin JK (2013) Microbial volatile emissions as insect semiochemicals. J Chem Ecol 39:840–59Google Scholar
- Han SH, Lee SJ, Moon JH, Park KH, Yang KY, Cho BH, Kim KY, Kim YW, Lee MC, Anderson AJ, Kim YC (2006) GacS-dependent production of 2R, 3R-butanediol by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 is a major determinant for eliciting systemic resistance against Erwinia carotovora but not against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci in tobacco. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:924–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lyon G (2007) Agents that can elicit induced resistance. In: Walters D, Newton A, Lyon G (eds) Induced resistance for plant defence: a sustainable approach to crop protection. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Manrique G, Vitta ACR, Ferreira RA, Zani CL, Unelius CR, Lazzari CR, Diotaiuti L, Lorenzo MG (2006) Chemical communication in chagas disease vectors. Source, identity, and potential function of volatiles released by the metasternal and Brindley’s glands of Triatoma infestans adults. J Chem Ecol 32:2035–2052PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rayko H, Johan A.S, Danny K, Andre K, Ian T. B (2008) Shared signals - ‘alarm calls’ from plants increase apparency to herbivores and their enemies in nature. Ecol Lett 11:24–34Google Scholar
- Tally A, Oostendorp M, Lawton K, Staub T, Bassy B (1999) Commercial development of elicitors of induced resistance to pathogens. In: Agrawal AA, Tuzun S, Bent E (eds) Inducible plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores: biochemistry, ecology, and agriculture. Amer. Phytopathol. Soc. Press, St. Paul, pp 357–369Google Scholar
- Yi HS, Yang JW, Ryu CM (2013) ISR meets SAR outside: additive action of the endophyte bacillus pumilus INR7 and the chemical inducer, benzothiadiazole, on induced resistance against bacterial spot in field-grown pepper. Front Plant Sci 4:122. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00122 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar