Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 617–620 | Cite as

Foraging Leaf-Cutting Ants Learn to Reject Vitis vinifera ssp. vinifera Plants that Emit Herbivore-Induced Volatiles

  • Theresa Thiele
  • Christian Kost
  • Flavio Roces
  • Rainer Wirth
Rapid Communication

Abstract

Leaf-cutting ants (LCAs) are dominant herbivores of the Neotropics, as well as economically important pests. Their foraging ecology and patterns/mechanisms of food selection have received considerable attention. Recently, it has been documented that LCAs exhibit a delayed rejection of previously accepted food plants following treatment with a fungicide that makes the plants unsuitable as substrate for their symbiotic fungus. Here, we investigated whether LCAs similarly reject plants with induced chemical defenses, by combining analysis of volatile emissions with dual-choice bioassays that used LCA subcolonies (Atta sexdens L.). On seven consecutive days, foraging ants were given the choice between leaf disks from untreated control plants and test plants of Vitis vinifera ssp. vinifera L. treated with the phytohormone jasmonic acid (JA) to mimic herbivore attack. Chemical analysis revealed the emission of a characteristic set of herbivore-induced volatile organic compounds (VOC) from JA-induced plants. Dual-choice experiments indicated that workers did not show any preference initially, but that they avoided JA-treated plants from day five onwards. Our finding that A. sexdens foragers learn to avoid VOC-emitting plants, which are likely detrimental to their symbiotic fungus, represents the first evidence for avoidance learning in attine ants toward plants with induced defenses.

Keywords

Atta sexdens Avoidance learning Delayed rejection Food plant selection Herbivore-induced plant volatiles Induced defense hypothesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Wilhelm Boland from the Max Planck Institute in Jena for providing us access to the volatile analysis equipment, as well as Maritta Kunert and Anja David for help with GC/MS analysis. We also thank our colleagues from the University of Kaiserslautern: Burkhard Buedel (Department of Plant Ecology & Systematics) for financial support, Hans Reichenberger and Beatrix Weber for laboratory assistance, and gardeners (botanical garden) for growing the experimental plants. The stockmen (animal houses, University of Kaiserslautern) and Annette Laudahn (Biocenter, University of Würzburg) provided considerable support in maintaining the laboratory colonies. This study was partially supported by funds from the German Research Foundation (SFB 1047/TP C1)

References

  1. Cherrett JM (1968) The foraging behaviour of Atta cephalotes L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) I. Foraging pattern and plant species attacked in tropical rain forest. J Anim Ecol 37:387–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Donath J, Boland W (1995) Biosynthesis of acyclic homoterpenes: enzyme selectivity and absolute configuration of the nerolidol precursor. Phytochemistry 39:785–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Herz H, Holldöbler B, Roces F (2008) Delayed rejection in a leaf-cutting ant after foraging on plants unsuitable for the symbiotic fungus. Behav Ecol 19:575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Howard J, Cazin J Jr, Wiemer D (1988) Toxicity of terpenoid deterrents to the leafcutting ant Atta cephalotes and its mutualistic fungus. J Chem Ecol 14:59–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Koch T, Krumm T, Jung V, Engelberth J, Boland W (1999) Differential induction of plant volatile biosynthesis in the lima bean by early and late intermediates of the octadecanoid-signaling pathway. Plant Physiol 121:153–162PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kost C, Tremmel M, Wirth R (2011) Do leaf cutting ants cut undetected? Testing the effect of ant-induced plant defences on foraging decisions in Atta colombica. PLoS ONE 6:e22340PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ridley P, Howse PE, Jackson CW (1996) Control of the behaviour of leaf-cutting ants by their ‘symbiotic’ fungus. Experienta 52:631–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Saverschek N, Roces F (2011) Foraging leafcutter ants: olfactory memory underlies delayed avoidance of plants unsuitable for the symbiotic fungus. Anim Behav 82:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. van den Boom CM, van Beek T, Posthumus M, DE Groot A, Dicke M (2004) Qualitative and quantitative variation among volatile profiles induced by Tetranychus urticae feeding on plants from various families. J Chem Ecol 30:69–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wirth R, Herz H, Ryel RJ, Beyschlag W, Hölldobler B (2003) Herbivory of leaf-cutting ants: a case study on Atta colombica in the tropical rainforst of Panama. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theresa Thiele
    • 1
  • Christian Kost
    • 2
  • Flavio Roces
    • 3
  • Rainer Wirth
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Ecology and SystematicsUniversity of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany
  2. 2.Experimental Ecology and Evolution Group, Department of Bioorganic ChemistryMax Planck Institute for Chemical EcologyJenaGermany
  3. 3.Behavioural Physiology and Sociobiology, BiocenterUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations