Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 435–440 | Cite as

Solitary Foraging in the Ancestral South American Ant, Pogonomyrmex vermiculatus. Is it Due to Constraints in the Production or Perception of Trail Pheromones?

  • Hugo Torres-ContrerasEmail author
  • Ruby Olivares-Donoso
  • Hermann M. Niemeyer
Rapid Communication


Several North American species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants exhibit group foraging, whereas South American species are exclusively solitary foragers. The composition of the secretions of the poison and Dufour glands in the South American species, Pogonomyrmex vermiculatus, were analyzed, and the secretions and their components were tested as trail pheromones in laboratory bioassays. The major compounds in the poison gland were the alkylpyrazines, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, 2,3,5-trimethylpyrazine, and 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine. The Dufour gland contained five alkanes, from tridecane to heptadecane, with pentadecane being most abundant. In behavioral bioassays, poison gland extracts and the mixture of pyrazines produced a trail pheromone effect, whereas the Dufour gland extracts and the alkanes had no effect on ant locomotion. We conclude that group foraging in P. vermiculatus does not arise from the inability to produce or detect possible pheromones, but rather, from physiological and/or ecological factors.


Harvester ants Trail pheromones Alkylpyrazines Trimethylpyrazine Pentadecane Behavioral bioassays 



We thank E. D. Morgan for advice during the implementation of the solid sample injection technique and for sharing unpublished results on the analysis of pyrazines and J. G. Millar for suggestions during the editing of the original manuscript. We also thank Claudia Cabrillana for assistance in the laboratory. Financial support by FONDECYT (grant 3060064 to H.T.-C.) and International Program in the Chemical Sciences at Uppsala University (H.M.N.) is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Beekman, M., Sumpter, D. J. T., and Ratnieks, F. L. W. 2001. Phase transition between disordered and ordered foraging in Pharaoh’s ants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:9703–9706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billen, J., Attygalle, A. B., Morgan, E. D., and Ollett, D. G. 1987. Gas chromatography without solvents. Pheromone studies: the Dufour’s gland of the ant Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Int. Anal. 1:3–6.Google Scholar
  3. Do Nascimento, R. R., Jackson, B. D., Morgan, E. D., Clarke, W. H., and Blom, P. E. 1993. Chemical secretions of two sympatric harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex salinus and Messor lobognathus. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1993–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hölldobler, B. and Wilson, E. O. 1990. The Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. Hölldobler, B., Morgan, E. D., Oldham, N. J., and Liebig, J. 2001. Recruitment pheromone in the harvester ant genus Pogonomyrmex. J. Insect Physiol. 47:369–374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hölldobler, B., Morgan, E. D., Oldham, N. J., Liebig, J., and Liu, Y. 2004. Dufour gland secretion in the harvester ant genus Pogonomyrmex. Chemoecology 14:101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, R. A. 2001. Biogeography and community structure of North American seed-harvester ants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 46:1–29.Google Scholar
  8. Medel, R. G. 1995. Convergence and historical effects in harvester ant assemblages of Australia, North America, and South America. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 55:29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morgan, E. D. 1990. Preparation of small-scale samples from insects for chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 236:227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Taber, S. W. 1998. The World of the Harvester Ants. Texas A&M Univ. Press, College Station, TX.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo Torres-Contreras
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ruby Olivares-Donoso
    • 1
  • Hermann M. Niemeyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations