Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 213–217 | Cite as

Chemical Deterrence of a Cyanobacterial Metabolite against Generalized and Specialized Grazers

Rapid Communication


Pitipeptolide A is the major secondary metabolite in a persistent population of the cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscula from Guam. Because this cyanobacterium is of low preference to many sympatric consumers, we tested the hypothesis that this compound acted as a chemical defense. Pitipeptolide A was deterrent to urchins, two species of amphipods, and small herbivorous crabs, whereas it did not deter feeding by the sea hare Stylocheilus striatus, which readily consumes cyanobacteria. Although our comparison included various small invertebrates, which are often tolerant to algal chemical defenses, this cyanobacterial compound proved deterrent at natural concentrations to all but one of the consumer species tested. Thus, the production of defensive secondary metabolites is likely related to the common occurrence of L. majuscula on this coral reef despite the abundance of diverse grazers.


Chemical defense Cyanobacteria Guam Lyngbya majuscula Mesograzers Pitipeptolide 


  1. Capper, A., Tibbetts, I. R., O’Neil, Y. M., and Shaw, G. R. 2005. The fate of Lyngbya majuscula toxins in three potential consumers. J. Chem. Ecol. 31:1595–1606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cruz-Rivera, E. and Paul, V. J. 2002. Coral reef benthic cyanobacteria as food and refuge: Diversity, chemistry and complex interactions. Proc. 9th Int. Coral Reef Symp. 1:515–520.Google Scholar
  3. Cruz-Rivera, E. and Paul, V. J. 2006. Feeding by coral reef mesograzers: Algae or cyanobacteria? Coral Reefs. in press.Google Scholar
  4. Hay, M. E. and Steinberg, P. D. 1992. The chemical ecology of plant–herbivore interactions in marine versus terrestrial communities, pp. 372–408, in G. A. Rosenthal and M. R. Berenbaum (eds.). Herbivores: Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites, Vol. II, Ecological and Evolutionary Processes. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  5. Hay, M. E., Stachowicz, J. J., Cruz-Rivera, E., Bullard, S., Deal, M. S., and Lindquist, N. 1998. Bioassays with marine and freshwater macroorganisms, pp. 39–141, in K. F. Haynes and J. G. Millar (eds.). Bioassay Methods: Methods in Chemical Ecology, Vol. 2. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Luesch, H., Pangilinan, R., Yoshida, W. Y., Moore, R. E., and Paul, V. J. 2001. Pitipeptolides A and B, new cyclodepsipeptides from the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscula. J. Nat. Prod. 64:304–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pangilinan, R. F. 2000. Effects of light and nutrients on intraspecific secondary metabolite variation in the benthic cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscula. M.S. thesis, University of Guam, 29 p.Google Scholar
  8. Paul, V. J., Cruz-Rivera, E., and Thacker, R. W. 2001. Chemical mediation of macroalgal–herbivore interactions: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives, pp. 227–265, in J. McClintock and W. Baker (eds.). Marine Chemical Ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  9. Rudman, W. B. 1999. Stylocheilus longicauda and Stylocheilus citrina nomenclatural discussion. Sea Slug Forum,
  10. Thacker, R. W., Ginsburg, D. W., and Paul, V. J. 2001. Effects of herbivore exclusion and nutrient enrichment on coral reef macroalgae and cyanobacteria. Coral Reefs 19:318–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyJackson State UniversityJacksonUSA
  2. 2.Smithsonian Marine Station at Fort PierceFort PierceUSA

Personalised recommendations