Reading Failure in a Completely Transparent Orthography Representing a Morphologically Highly Complex Agglutinative Language: the Case of Turkish
- 86 Downloads
This study investigates differences in the word processing skills of students with and without reading difficulties who read Turkish, an entirely transparent orthography. Thirty-five students diagnosed as poor readers and 51 typically developing controls were tested across two experiments, one that assessed their ability to process identicalness of isolated real words as opposed to pseudowords and another that assessed their ability to judge semantic relatedness of two real words. Participants were from two education levels; half of them were 3rd-4th graders and half were 6th–7th graders. An integrative view of the findings points to an apparent failure of Turkish poor readers to develop a lexicalized reading route that mediates word recognition by means of permanent orthographic knowledge. Moreover, their ability to effectively process word letter sequences along a non-lexical grapheme-to-phoneme conversion-based reading route was found to be seriously restricted. Findings are discussed with direct reference to orthographic transparency, dual-route reading theory and the orthographic self-teaching concept.
KeywordsReading failure Lexical processing Semantic processing Orthographic transparency Turkish orthography
The authors would like to express their gratitude to all educational institutes and participants that took part in this study.
This study was funded by the SLC on Visual Language and Visual Learning (VL2), NSF: Grant # SBE-0541953
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The reported study does not violate any fundamental ethical considerations for the protection of humans or animals. Its compliance with ethical standards has been approved by the IRB of the authors’ respective academic institutions.
The study was executed only after getting approval from all relevant agencies, including from the participants themselves.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Avdyli, R., Castejon, L., & Cuetos, F. (2014). Lexical effects in word naming in Spanish children. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17(e23), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 35(1), 116–124.Google Scholar
- Guldenoglu, B. (2016). The effects of syllable-awareness skills on the word-reading performances of students reading in a transparent orthography. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(3), 425–442.Google Scholar
- Jackson, N. E., & Coltheart, M. (2001). Routes to reading success and failure: Toward an integrated cognitive psychology of atypical reading. New York: Psychological Press.Google Scholar
- Krashen, S.D. (2001). The comprehension hypothesis and its rivals. Selected papers from the eleventh international symposium on English teaching/fourth pan-Asian conference, 395–404.Google Scholar
- Krashen, S. D. (2002). Explorations in language acquisition and use: The Taipei lectures. Taipei: Crane.Google Scholar
- Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70(1), –13.Google Scholar
- Niemi, P., Poskiparta, E., & Vauras, M. (2001). Benefits of training in linguistic awareness dissipate by grade 3. The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 8, 330–337.Google Scholar
- Report of the National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH publication no. 00–4769). Washington: GPO.Google Scholar
- Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2013). Psychopathology of dyslexia and reading disorders. In A. Davis (Ed.), Psychopathology of childhood and adolescence: A neuropsychological approach (pp. 109–126). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Snow, C., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Troia, G. (2004). Phonological processing and its influence on literacy learning. In C. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Appel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 271–301). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar