Non-ambulatory People with Intellectual Disabilities Practice Functional Arm, Leg or Head Responses Via a Smartphone-Based Program
- 34 Downloads
This study extended the research on technology-aided programs for promoting the independent performance (practice) of functional motor responses (e.g., arm or leg-foot movements) in people with intellectual disabilities and extensive motor impairments. Specifically, the study assessed (a) the suitability of simple commercial technology (i.e., a smartphone) to monitor the responses targeted and provide stimulation contingent on them, and (b) the impact of response performance on the participants’ level of physical exertion (heart rates) and mood. The results showed that the simple commercial technology was effective in helping the participants independently practice the two target responses selected for them. All participants had a significant increase in their heart rates during the intervention sessions, thus suggesting that the performance of the target responses represented a mild form of physical activity. Moreover, all participants displayed mood improvement (i.e., an increase in indices of happiness) during the intervention sessions. The implications of these results are discussed in terms of (a) new technology solutions for intervention programs with people with intellectual disabilities and extensive motor impairments, and (b) potential benefits of those programs.
KeywordsSmartphone-based program Intellectual disability Motor impairment Stimulation control Response exercise Physical activity
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Appropriate institutional approval and written informed consent were obtained for the study. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
The participants’ legal representatives had provided written informed consent for the participants’ involvement in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.
- Barlow, D. H., Nock, M., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single-case experimental designs (3rd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Carter, E. W., Lane, K. L., Cooney, M., Weir, K., Moss, C. K., & Machalicek, W. (2013). Parent assessments of self-determination importance and performance of students with autism or intellectual disability. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 118, 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fernhall, B., & Pitetti, K. H. (2001). Limitations to physical work capacity in individuals with mental retardation. Clinical Exercise Physiology, 3, 176–185.Google Scholar
- Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., Campodonico, F., et al. (2012). Persons with multiple disabilities exercise adaptive response schemes with the help of technology-based programs: three single-case studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 849–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Green, V. A., Oliva, D., Campodonico, F., et al. (2013a). Technology-aided programs to support exercise of adaptive head responses or leg-foot and hands responses in children with multiple disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 16, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., et al. (2017). Promoting functional activity engagement in people with multiple disabilities through the use of microswitch-aided programs. Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Campodonico, F., Oliva, D., et al. (2018). Using microswitch-aided programs for people with multiple disabilities to promote stimulation control and mild physical exercise. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 43, 242–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pedhazur, E., & Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement design and analysis: An integrated approach. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Pierce, W. D., & Cheney, C. D. (2008). Behavior analysis and learning (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, M. J., Taylor, D., Gamboa, P., Vlaev, I., & Darzi, A. (2016). Using motion-sensor games to encourage physical activity for adults with intellectual disability. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 220, 417–423.Google Scholar
- Vlaskamp, C., De Geeter, K. I., Huijsmans, L. M., & Smit, I. H. (2003). Passive activities: the effectiveness of multisensory environments on the level of activity of individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Waninge, A., Van der Putten, A. A. J., Stewart, R. E., Stenbergen, B., van Wijck, R., & van der Schans, C. P. (2013). Heart rate and physical activity patterns in persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 27(11), 3150–3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Whiting, M. (2014). Children with disability and complex health needs: the impact on family life. Nursing Children and Young People, 26, 26–30.Google Scholar