Advertisement

Teaching Phonics to Preschool Children with Autism Using Frequency-Building and Computer-Assisted Instruction

  • Michelle O’Brien
  • Aoife Mc Tiernan
  • Jennifer Holloway
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The current study investigated the effects of a computer-assisted frequency-building intervention to increase fluency with letter-sound correspondences. A multiple probe design across stimulus sets was employed with four children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to evaluate the outcomes of intervention. Pre-intervention measures of language ability, repetitive, and on-task behavior were recorded in order to assess how such participant characteristics may impact intervention effects. Increases in the rate of correct letter-sound correspondences were found for all participants. Measures of outcomes associated with fluency; namely, maintenance, endurance, stability, application, and generativity were also recorded. Participants demonstrated the ability to maintain high rates of correct responding for all fluency outcomes at post-testing, with the exception of generativity.

Keywords

Fluency-based instruction Computer-assisted instruction Phonics Autism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Juniper Tree Autism Services, Athlone, Ireland, and in particular the four students who participated. Thank you for supporting this research and making a valuable contribution to this important area of research for children with autism.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Parental consent was obtained for all participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anohina, A. (2005). Analysis of the terminology used in the field of virtual learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 8, 91–102.Google Scholar
  3. Begeny, J. C., Krouse, H. E., Ross, S. G., & Mitchell, R. C. (2009). Increasing elementary-aged students’ reading fluency with small-group interventions: a comparison of repeated reading, listening passage preview, and listening only strategies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 211–228.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-009-9090-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodfish, J. W., Symons, F. J., Parker, D. E., & Lewis, M. H. (2000). Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: comparisons to mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 237–243.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005596502855.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzinexya, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.  https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, H. M., Oram-Cardy, J., & Johnson, A. (2013). A meta-analysis of the reading comprehension skills of individuals on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(9), 32–955.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1638-1.Google Scholar
  7. Burns, M. K., Kwoka, H., Lim, B., Crone, M., Haegele, K., Parker, D. C., & Scholin, S. E. (2011). Minimum reading fluency necessary for comprehension among second-grade students. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 124–132.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calhoon, J. A. (2001). Factors affecting the reading of rimes in words and nonwords in beginning readers with cognitive disabilities and typically developing readers: Explorations in similarity and difference in word recognition cue use. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 491–504.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012268909286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, S. A., & Bernard-Opitz, V. (1993). Comparison of personal and computer-assisted instruction for children with autism. Mental Retardation, 31, 368–376.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson, M. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2013). Characterization and prediction of early reading abilities in children with autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 828–845.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1936-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duhon, G. J., House, S. E., Poncy, B. C., Hastings, K. W., & McClurg, S. C. (2010). An examination of two techniques for promoting response generalization of early literacy skills. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19, 62–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-010-9097-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott, S. N., & Treuting, M. V. B. (1991). The behavior intervention rating scale: Development and validation of a pretreatment acceptability and effectiveness measure. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(91)90014-I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frith, U., & Snowling, M. (1983). Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 329–342.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1983.tb00906.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harn, B., Stoolmiller, M., & Chard, D. (2008). Measuring the dimensions of alphabetic principle on the reading development of first graders: The role of automaticity and unitization. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 143.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219407313585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris, T. L., & Hodges, R. E. (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  18. Heikkilä, R., Aro, M., Närhi, V., Westerholm, J., & Ahonen, T. (2013). Does training in syllable recognition improve reading speed? A computer-based trial with poor readers from second and third grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 398–414.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.753452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heinicke, M. R., Carr, J. E., LeBlanc, L. A., & Severtson, J. M. (2010). On the use of fluency training in the behavioral treatment of autism: a commentary. Behavior Analyst, 33, 223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Holding, E., Bray, M. A., & Kehle, T. J. (2011). Does speed matter? A comparison of the effectiveness of fluency and discrete trial training for teaching noun labels to children with autism. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 166–183.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, K., & Street, E. M. (2013). Response to intervention and precision teaching. NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: methods for clinical and applied settings. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kubina, R. M., & Wolfe, P. (2005). Potential applications of behavioral fluency for students with autism. Exceptionality, 13, 35–44.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1301_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kubina, R. M., & Yurich, K. K. L. (2012). The precision teaching book. Lemont: Greatness Achieved Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  25. Libby, M. E., Weiss, J. S., Bancroft, S., & Ahearn, W. H. (2008). A comparison of most-to-least and least-to-most prompting on the acquisition of solitary play skills. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 37–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391719.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Martens, B. K., Werder, C. S., Hier, B. O., & Koenig, E. A. (2013). Fluency training in phoneme blending: a preliminary study of generalized effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 16–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-012-9159-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McTiernan, A., Holloway, J., Healy, O., & Hogan, M. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of the Morningside math facts curriculum on fluency, stability, endurance and application outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 49–68.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9227-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH publication no. 00–4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  29. Nation, K., & Norbury, C. F. (2005). Why reading comprehension fails: insights from developmental disorders. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nopprapun, M., & Holloway, J. (2014). A comparison of fluency training and discrete trial instruction to teach letter sounds to children with ASD: acquisition and learning outcomes. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 788–802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.03.015.
  31. Norbury, C., & Nation, K. (2011). Understanding variability in reading comprehension in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: interactions with language status and decoding skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 191–210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. J. (2009). An improved effect size for single case research: non-overlap of all pairs (NAP). Behavior Therapy, 40, 357–367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pennington, R. C. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction for teaching academic skills to students with autism Spectrum disorders: a Review of Literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 239–248.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357610378291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramdoss, S., Mulloy, A., Lang, R., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., Didden, R., & El Zein, F. (2011). Use of computer-based interventions to improve literacy skills in students with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 1306–1318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ricketts, J., Jones, C. R., Happé, F., & Charman, T. (2013). Reading comprehension in autism spectrum disorders: The role of oral language and social functioning. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 807–816.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1619-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ritchey, K., & Speece, D. (2006). From letter names to word reading: the nascent role of sublexical fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(3), 301–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2001). How to summarize single-participant research: ideas and Applications. Exceptionality, 9, 227–244.  https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15327035EX0904_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single subject research: methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.  https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258700800206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shapiro, E. S. (2004). Academic skills problems work-book (rev.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Shapiro, E. S. (2013). Behavioral observation of students in school. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education. United States.Google Scholar
  41. Silber, J. M., & Martens, B. K. (2010). Programming for the generalization of oral reading fluency: Repeated readings of entire text versus multiple exemplars. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(1), 30–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-010-9099-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weiss, M. J., Pearson, N., Foley, K., & Pahl, S. (2010). The importance of fluency outcomes in learners with autism. The Behavior Analyst Today, 11, 245–252.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Welsh, M. C., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. (1987). Word recognition and comprehension skills in hyperlexic children. Brain and Language, 32, 76–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(87)90118-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Whalon, K. J., Al Otaiba, S., & Delano, M. E. (2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on autism and other developmental disabilities, 24, 3–16.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357608328515.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (2002). Preschool language scale - 4th edition (PLS-4). NY: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle O’Brien
    • 1
  • Aoife Mc Tiernan
    • 2
  • Jennifer Holloway
    • 1
  1. 1.National University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  2. 2.University of South WalesPontypriddUK

Personalised recommendations