Decreasing Pica Attempts by Manipulating the Environment to Support Prosocial Behavior

  • Jonathan D. Schmidt
  • Abigail Long
  • Amanda L. Goetzel
  • Christopher Tung
  • Eliana Pizarro
  • Cara Phillips
  • Nicole Hausman
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

It is well established in the literature that pica displayed by individuals with developmental disabilities is most likely to be maintained by automatic reinforcement. However, there is a need for additional research regarding interventions that emphasize skill acquisition by teaching individuals with automatically maintained pica, multiple alternative behaviors to reduce the occurrence of this behavior. For the current study, pica emitted by three participants with developmental disabilities was targeted for assessment and treatment. Results of a functional behavioral assessment, which included a functional analysis, showed each participant’s pica was maintained by automatic reinforcement. Treatment was individualized for each participant, but primarily focused on response interruption and redirection, as well as differentially reinforcing alternative behaviors such as discarding and vacuuming potential pica items. After thinning the schedule of reinforcement for each participant, treatment was generalized across settings and people. Overall, low rates of pica were maintained over time for all participants.

Keywords

Pica Functional analysis Autism Skill acquisition 

References

  1. Ali, Z. (2001). Pica in people with intellectual disability: A literature review of etiology, epidemiology and complications. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 26, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed., text rev.) Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Ashworth, M., Hirdes, J. P., & Martin, L. (2009). The social and recreational characteristics of adults with intellectual disability and pica living in institutions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 512–520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogart, L. C., Piersel, W. C., & Gross, E. J. (1995). The long-term treatment of life-threatening pica: A case study of a woman with profound mental retardation living in an applied setting. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 7, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Kurtz, P. F., Sherer, M. R., & Lachman, S. R. (1994). A preliminary evaluation of empirically derived consequences for the treatment of pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 447–457.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Goh, H. L., Iwata, B. A., & Kahng, S. (1999). Multicomponent assessment and treatment of cigarette pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 297–316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Hagopian, L. P., & Adelinis, J. D. (2001). Response blocking with and without redirection for the treatment of pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 527–530.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagopian, L. P., Gonzalez, M. L., Rivet, T. T., Triggs, M., & Clark, S. B. (2011a). Response interruption and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior for the treatment of pica. Behavioral Interventions, 26, 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagopian, L. P., Rooker, G. W., & Rolider, N. U. (2011b). Identifying empirically supported treatments for pica in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2114–2120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagopian, L. P., Rolider, N. U., & Rooker, G. W. (2012). Behavioral assessment and treatment of pica. In J. K. Luiselli (Ed.), The Handbook of high-risk challenging behaviors in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 161–176). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Hammond, J. L., Iwata, B. A., Rooker, G. W., Fritz, J. N., & Bloom, S. E. (2013). Effects of fixed versus random condition sequencing during multielement functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 22–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., Contrucci, S. A., & Maglieri, K. A. (1997). Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 459–473.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Iwata, B. A., DeLeon, I. G., & Roscoe, E. M. (2013). Reliability and validity of the functional analysis screening tool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(1), 271–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kern, L., Starosta, K., & Adelman, B. E. (2006). Reducing pica by teaching children to exchange inedible items for foods. Behavior Modification, 30, 135–158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lerman, D. C., Iwata, B. A., & Wallace, M. D. (1999). Side effects of extinction: Prevalence of bursting and aggression during the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 1–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Matson, J. L., & Bamburg, J. W. (1999). A descriptive study of pica behavior in persons with mental retardation. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matson, J. L., & Vollmer, T. R. (1995). User’s guide: Questions about behavioral function (QABF). Baton Rouge, LA: Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Matson, J. L., Hattier, M. A., Belva, B., & Matson, M. L. (2013). Pica in persons with developmental disabilities: Approaches to treatment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 2564–2571.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McAdam, D. B., Sherman, J. A., Sheldon, J. B., & Napolaiano, D. A. (2004). Behavioral interventions to reduce pica of persons with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification, 28, 45–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McCord, B. E., Grosser, J. W., Iwata, B. A., & Powers, L. A. (2005). An analysis of responses-blocking parameters in the prevention of pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 391–394.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Northup, J., Fisher, W., Kahng, S. W., Harrell, R., & Kurtz, P. (1997). An assessment of the necessary strength of behavioral treatments for severe behavior problems. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paisey, T. J., & Whitney, R. B. (1989). A long-term case study of analysis, response suppression, and treatment maintenance involving life-threatening pica. Behavioral Interventions, 4, 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Piazza, C. C., Hanley, G. P., & Fisher, W. W. (1996). Functional analysis and treatment of cigarette pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 437–450.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Piazza, C. C., Roane, H. S., Keeney, K. M., Boney, B. R., & Abt, K. A. (2002). Varying response effort in the treatment of pica maintained by automatic reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 233–246.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Pipkin, C. S. P., Vollmer, T. R., & Sloman, K. N. (2010). Effects of treatment integrity failures during differential reinforcement of alternative behavior: A translational model. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rapp, J. T., Dozier, C. L., & Carr, J. E. (2001). Functional assessment and treatment of pica: A single-case experiment. Behavioral Interventions, 16, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stiegler, L. (2005). Understanding pica behavior: A review for clinical and education professionals. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., Ringdahl, J. E., & Roane, H. S. (1995). Progressing from brief assessments to extended experimental analyses in the evaluation of aberrant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 561–576.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Wasano, L. C., Borrero, J. C., & Kohn, C. S. (2009). Brief report: A comparison of indirect versus experimental strategies for the assessment of pica. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1582–1586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan D. Schmidt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abigail Long
    • 1
    • 3
  • Amanda L. Goetzel
    • 1
  • Christopher Tung
    • 1
    • 4
  • Eliana Pizarro
    • 1
    • 5
  • Cara Phillips
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nicole Hausman
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral PsychologyKennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.RockvilleUSA
  4. 4.AtlantaUSA
  5. 5.GainsevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations