A Functional Communication Training and Chained Schedule Procedure to Treat Challenging Behavior with Multiple Functions
- 977 Downloads
We evaluated a procedure consisting of functional communication training (FCT) and a chained schedule of reinforcement to treat multiply maintained challenging behavior exhibited by an individual diagnosed with autism. First, we conducted a functional analysis that yielded results indicating that challenging behavior served multiple functions. Next, we implemented a chained schedule of reinforcement procedure in which during the initial link, mands for a stimulus were reinforced on a fixed ratio (FR) 1 schedule of reinforcement. The participant’s access to the stimulus signaled the second link of the chained schedule that consisted of a fixed time (FT) 30 s schedule in which all three functional reinforcers were provided. Last, we modified the chained schedule procedure to increase ease of implementation and promote compliance with academic tasks. The results showed that the treatment was successful in the treatment of challenging behavior with multiple functions. Future directions in the development of treatments that simultaneously address multiple functions are discussed.
KeywordsAutism Chained schedule of reinforcement Challenging behavior Functional communication training Functional analysis Multiple functions
- Falcomata, T. S., Roane, H. S., Muething, C. S., Stephenson, K. M., & Ing, A. D. (2012). Functional communication training and chained schedules of reinforcement to treat challenging behavior maintained by terminations of activity interruptions. Behavior Modification. Published Online First: 9 February 2012. doi: 10.1177/0145445511433821.
- Gollub, L. (1977). Conditioned reinforcement: Schedule effects. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 288–312). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- O’Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Reese, R. M., Richman, D. M., Zarcone, J., & Zarcone, T. (2003). Individualizing functional assessments for children with autism: The contribution of perseverative behavior and sensory disturbances to disruptive behavior. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620Google Scholar
- Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1988). The childhood autism rating scale (CARS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Vollmer, T. R., Iwata, B. A., Zarcone, J. R., Smith, R. G., & Mazaleski, J. L. (1993). The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: Noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 9–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar