Love Over Gold—The Correlation of Happiness Level with Some Life Satisfaction Factors Between Persons with and Without Physical Disability

  • Marko MarinićEmail author
  • Tihana Brkljačić
Original Article


The aim of this research was to examine levels of happiness among persons with and without physical disability, and to study prediction of happiness from satisfaction with various life aspects. A group of persons with physical disability (N = 397) and the control group of persons from the general population (N = 913) filled in the Fordyce instrument (Social Indicators Research, 20:355–381, 1988) to evaluate levels of happiness and the “International Well-being Index” to measure satisfaction with particular life aspects. Both groups expressed positive happiness level and satisfaction with the majority of life aspects. However, happiness level of persons with disability was significantly lower. Forty-eight percent of the variance in happiness among persons with disability and 30% of the variance in happiness among the control group can be assigned to various life satisfaction aspects. Satisfaction with health, relationships, and achievements contribute to happiness in both groups, while satisfaction with physical safety and acceptance by the community are significant happiness predictors only for persons with disability. Economic status is the only significant predictor for the control group.


Happiness Well-being indices Life satisfaction Persons with disability Disability paradox 



This research was conducted as a part of two projects “Development of National Indicators of Quality of Life” and “Religious pluralism, postmodern religious movements and Croatian identity” funded by grants from the Ministry of Science, Education and Sport of the Republic of Croatia.


  1. Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 977–988. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00411-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allman, A. (1990). Subjective well-being of people with disabilities: Measurement issues. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, F., & Withey, S. R. (1976). Social indicators of wellbeing. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  4. Argyle, M. (2000). Psychology and religion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  7. Bradburn, N. M., & Caplovitz, D. (1965). Reports on happiness. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  8. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.917.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron, P. (1974). Social stereotypes: three faces of happiness. Psychology Today, 8, 63–64.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. The American Psychologist, 55, 34–43. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., & Lucas, S. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81–84. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., & Such, E. (1997). Age and subjective well-being: an international analysis. Annual Review of Gerontology & Geriatrics, 17, 304–324.Google Scholar
  14. Fordyce, M. (1988). A review of results on the happiness measures: a 60-second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20, 355–381. doi: 10.1007/BF00302333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freedman, J. (1978). Happy people. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  16. Harker, L., & Keltner, D. (2001). Expressions of positive emotion in women’s college yearbook pictures and their relationship to personality and life outcomes across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 112–124. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herzog, A. R., & Rodgers, W. L. (1981). Age and satisfaction: data from several large surveys. Research on Aging, 3, 142–165. doi: 10.1177/016402758132002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hotard, S. R., McFatter, R. M., McWhirter, R. M., & Stegall, M. E. (1989). Interactive effects of extroversion, neuroticism, and social relationships on subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 321–331. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaliterna-Lipovcan, L., & Prizmic-Larsen, Z. (2006). What makes Croats happy? Predictors of happiness in representative sample. In A. D. Fave (Ed.), Dimensions of well-being. Research and intervention (pp. 53–59). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  20. Larson, R. (1978). Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 109–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lichtenstein, P., Gatz, M., Pedersen, N. L., Berg, S., & McClearn, G. E. (1996). A co-twin control study of response to widowhood. Journal of Gerontology, 51, 279–289.Google Scholar
  22. Lucas, R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: does happiness change after major life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 75–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00479.x. Association for Psychological Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lykken, D. (1999). Happiness: The nature and nature of joy and contentment. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mehnert, T., Krauss, H. H., Nadler, R., & Boyd, M. (1990). Correlates of life satisfaction in those with disabling conditions. Rehabilitation Psychology, 35, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Myers, D. (2000). The funds, friends and faith of happy people. The American Psychologist, 55, 56–67. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1996). The pursuit of happiness: new research uncovers some anti-intuitive insights into how many people are happy—and why. Scientific American, 274(5), 70–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schilling, O. (2006). Development of life satisfaction in old age: another view on the “paradox”. Social Indicators Research, 75, 241–271. doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-5297-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realise your potential for lasting fulfilment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Silver, R. L. (1980). Coping with an undesirable life event: A study of early reactions to physical disability. Evanston: Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, J., Fleeson, W., Geiselmann, B., Settersten, R. A., & Kunzmann, U. (1999). Sources of well-being in very old age. In P. B. Baltes, & K. U. Mayer (Eds.), The Berlin aging study: Aging from 70 to 100 (pp. 450–471). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tellegen, A., Lykken, D., Bouchard, T. J., Wilcox, K. J., Segal, N., & Rich, S. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1031–1039. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weinberg, N. (1988). Another perspective: Attitudes of people with disabilities. In H. E. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 141–153). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Wessman, A. E., & Ricks, D. F. (1966). Mood and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  34. White, A. (2007). A global projection of subjective well-being: a challenge to positive psychology? Psychtalk, 56, 17–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social Sciences Ivo PilarZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations