Wheelchair-Bound Persons with Multiple Disabilities Learning to Use Simple Foot–Leg Responses Within a Microswitch-Based Program
- 47 Downloads
Two wheelchair-bound adults with multiple disabilities were taught to use simple foot-leg responses to control environmental stimulation within a microswitch-based program.During the program, recording was also made of their mood (indices of happiness) and interviews were conducted with 10 health professionals on the possible benefits of the foot-leg responses.Data showed that both participants learned to use the foot-leg responses andmaintained them at high frequencies during the course of the study lasting about 3 months.They also had a substantial increase in their indices of happiness.Interview data indicated that the foot-leg responses were considered benefi-cial in terms of body awareness and muscular trophism. Implications of the findings are discussed.
Key Wordsfoot–leg responses indices of happiness microswitches multiple disabilities wheelchair-bound persons
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Gutowski, S. J. (1996). Response acquisition for music or beverages in adults with profound multiple handicaps. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil. 8: 221–231.Google Scholar
- Holburn, S., Nguyen, D., and Vietze, P. M. (2004). Computer-assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities. Behav. Interv. 19: 25–37.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, R. E., Czyrny, J. J., Fung, T. S., Unsworth, J. D., and Hirsh, J. (2002). Electrical foot stimulation and implications of the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease. Thromb. Haemostasis 88: 200–204.Google Scholar
- Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Oliva, D., Campodonico, F., and Groeneweg, J. (2003). Stimulation and microswitch-based programs for enhancing indices of happiness: A maintenance assessment. Behav. Interv. 18: 53–61.Google Scholar
- Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Oliva, D., and Groeneweg, J. (2002a). Impact of stimulation versus microswitch-based programs on indices of happiness of people with profound multiple disabilities. Res. Dev. Disabil. 23: 149–160.Google Scholar
- Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Oliva, D., Piazzolla, G., Pirani, P., and Groeneweg, J. (2002b). Evaluating the use of multiple microswitches and responses for children with multiple disabilities. J. Intell. Disabil. Res. 46: 346–351.Google Scholar
- Matson, J. L., Bamburg, J. W., and Smalls, Y. (2004). An analysis of snoezelen equiment to reinforce persons with severe and profound mental retardation. Res. Develop. Disabil. 25: 89–95.Google Scholar
- Miltenberger, R. (1997). Behavior Modification: Principles and Procedures, Brooks/Cole, New York.Google Scholar
- Mount, H., and Cavet, J. (1995). Multi-sensory environments: An exploration of their potential for young people with profound and multiple learning disabilities. Br. J. Spec. Educ. 22: 52–55.Google Scholar
- Richards, S. B., Taylor, R. L., Ramasamy, R., and Richards, R. Y. (1999). Single subject research: Applications in Educational and Clinical Settings, Wadsworth, London.Google Scholar
- Wehmeyer, M., and Schwartz, M. (1998). The relationship between self-determination and quality of life for adults with mental retardation. Educ. Train. Mental Retard. Dev. Disabil. 33: 3–12.Google Scholar