Advertisement

Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 240–249 | Cite as

Ethics and Confidentiality for Psychologists in Academic Health Centers

  • Kathleen Ashton
  • Amy Sullivan
Article

Abstract

Psychologists in academic health centers (AHC) face important ethical issues including confidentiality when working with a multidisciplinary team, sharing of information through the electronic health record, obtaining informed consent in a fast-paced healthcare environment, cultural competency in the medical setting, and issues related to supervision and training. The goal of this paper is to describe ethical issues for psychologists in AHCs in the context of case examples, and to consider ethical decision-making tools to enhance clinical care. Considerations for best practices in integrated care settings will be discussed, and the APA Ethical Standards will be referenced throughout.

Keywords

Ethics Integrated care Confidentiality Electronic health records Supervision 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors Kathleen Ashton and Amy Sullivan declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (1990). Guidelines for providers of psychological services to ethnic, linguistic, and culturally diverse populations. http://www.apa.org/pi/oema/resources/policy/provider-guidelines.aspx.
  2. American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.
  3. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2005). ASPPB code of conduct. Montgomery, AL: Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. http://www.asppb.org/publications/model/conduct.aspx.
  4. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2015). Supervisory guidelines for education and training leading to licensure as a health service provider. Montgomery, AL: Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.asppb.net/resource/resmgr/Guidelines/Final_Supervision_Guidelines.pdf.
  5. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Uppers Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  6. Bibla, T., Pena, A., & Bruce, C. (2015). Consultations across languages. Hastings Center Report 45, 13–14.Google Scholar
  7. Clemens, N. A. (2012). Privacy, consent, and the electronic health record: The person vs. the system. Journal of Psychiatry Practice, 18, 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, C. B. (2014). Multicultural ethics in professional psychology practice, consulting, and training. In F. T. L. Leong, L. Comas-Diaz, G. C. Nagayama Hall, V. C. McLoyd, J. E. Trimble (Eds.), APA handbook of multicultural psychology, Vol. 2: Applications and training (pp. 35–57). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenfield, D., & Pawsey, M. (2014). Medical tourism raises questions that highlight the need for care and caution. Medical Journal of Australia, 201, 568–569.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hodgson, J., Mendenhall, T., & Lamson, A. (2013). Patient and provider relationships: Consent, confidentiality, and managing mistakes in integrated primary care settings. Families, Systems and Health, 31, 28–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hudgins, C., Rose, S., Fifield, P. Y., & Arnault, S. (2013). Navigating the legal and ethical foundations of informed consent and confidentiality in integrated primary care. Families, Systems, & Health, 31, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knapp, S. J., & VandeCreek, L. D. (2012). Practical ethics for psychologists: A positive approach (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  14. Lunt, N., & Mannion, R. (2014). Patient mobility in the global marketplace: A multidisciplinary perspective. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 2, 155–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nielsen, B. A., Baum, R. A., & Soares, N. S. (2013). Navigating ethical issues with electronic health records in developmental-behavioral pediatric practice. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 34, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ohio Board of Psychology. (2014). Laws and rules governing the practice of psychology. Columbus, OH: Requirements pertaining to supervision. Retrieved July 17, 2017 from http://codes.ohio.gov/oac/4732-13-04.
  17. Snyder, J., Johnston, R., Crooks, V. A., Morgan, J., & Adams, K. (2016). How medical tourism enables preferential access to care: Four patterns from the Canadian context. Health Care Analysis.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-015-0312-0.Google Scholar
  18. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Minority Health. (2013). National standards for culturally and linguistically appropriate services in health and health care: A blueprint for advancing and sustaining CLAS policy and practice. https://www.thinkculturalhealth.hhs.gov/Content/clas.asp.
  19. Van Liew, J. R. (2012). Balancing confidentiality and collaboration within multidisciplinary health care teams. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 19, 411–417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Breast CenterDigestive Disease InstituteClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of MedicineCleveland Clinic Mellen CenterClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations