Advertisement

Letters of Recommendation for the Predoctoral Internship in Medical Schools and Other Settings: Do They Enhance Decision Making in the Selection Process?

  • James M. StedmanEmail author
  • John P. Hatch
  • Lawrence S. Schoenfeld
Article

Abstract

Since the 1970s, letters of recommendation to medical and other internship settings have surfaced as important variables in the internship selection process. However, several studies have challenged their value in the selection process, specifically by pointing out that these letters have an overly positive bias and fail to address applicant weaknesses. Our study, using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count text analysis method, developed a quantitative profile for a sample of letters of recommendation, determined whether letters differentiated among applicants with regard to positive/negative attributions, evaluated letters for positive and negative bias, and investigated potential gender bias of writers toward applicants. Results indicated that writers apply positive and negative attributions homogeneously across applicants, thus, rendering applicant differentiation on this basis impossible. Also, results demonstrated that letters of male and female writers were not biased toward male or female applicants. These findings, in combination with previous studies, question the utility of letters of recommendation as presently structured. Possible modifications are discussed.

Keywords

Psychology internship Clinical psychology training in medical settings Psychology internship selection 

References

  1. APPIC Members Survey: APPIC Predoctoral Internship Members. (2005). http://www.APPIC.Org.
  2. Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Drummond, F. E., Rodolfa, E. R., & Smith, D. (1981). A survey of APA and non-APA approved internship programs. American Psychologist, 36, 411–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grote, C. L., Robiner, W. N., & Haut, A. (2001). Disclosure of negative information in letters of recommendation: Writer’s intentions and reader’s experiences. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 655–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lopez, S., Oehlert, M., & Moberly, R. (1996). Selection criteria for American Psychological Association—Accredited internship programs: A survey of training directors. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 518–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Miller, R. K., & Van Rybroek, G. J. (1988). Internship letters of recommendation: Where are the other 90%? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 115–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mittenberg, W., Peterson, R. S., Cooper, J. T., Strauman, S., & Essig, S. M. (2000). Selection criteria for clinical neuropsychology internships. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 1–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2003). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Range, L., Menyhert, A., Walsh, M., & Hardin, K. (1991). Letters of recommendation: Perspectives, recommendations, and ethics. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 389–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Robiner, W. N., Saltzman, S. R., Hoberman, H. M., Semrud-Clikeman, M., & Schirvar, J. A. (1997). Psychology supervisors’ bias in evaluations and letters of recommendation. Clinical Supervisor, 16, 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rodolfa, E., Vielle, R., Russell, P., Nijer, S., Nguyen, D., Mendoza, M., et al. (1999). Internship selection: Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Spitzform, M., & Hamilton, S. (1976). A survey of directors from APA-approved internship programs on intern selection. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 7, 406–410.Google Scholar
  13. Stedman, J. M., Hatch, J. P., Schoenfeld, L. S., & Keilin, W. G. (2005). The structure of internship training: Current patterns and implications for the future of clinical and counseling psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sturgis, D. K., Verstegen, J. P., Randolph, D. L., & Garvin, R. B. (1980). Professional psychology internships. Professional Psychology, 11, 567–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Suran, B. G., Crivolio, A. J., & Kupst, M. J. (1977). A rating scale for the selection of internship applicants. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 591–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zar, J. H. (1974). Biostatistical analysis (pp. 398–401). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. Stedman
    • 1
    Email author
  • John P. Hatch
    • 1
  • Lawrence S. Schoenfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Texas Health Science CenterSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations