The Forgotten Faculty: Challenges for Ph.D.s in Clinical Medical School Departments
- First Online:
- 113 Downloads
The data and discussion contained in this invited paper are based on the opening plenary by the first author whose paper titled “The Status of Ph.D.s in US Medical Schools” was presented at the 3rd national conference of the Association of Psychologists in Academic Health Centers, Minneapolis, MN, May 2007. The significant growth of the number of Ph.D.s in clinical departments is described, as is their distribution. The roles they play; the barriers they face in terms of leadership opportunities, promotion and tenure; and the concerns they voice that are specific to this population are also discussed. Salary differentials between Ph.D.s on main and medical school campuses are provided. Recommendations for future investigation of disparate treatment and for faculty development opportunities specifically aimed at this group are found at the conclusion of the paper.
KeywordsFaculty development Faculty compensation Promotion and tenure
- American Association of Medical Colleges. (2005). AAMC Faculty Policies Search Tool. Retrieved December 5, 2005 from https://services.aamc.org/dsportal/index.cfm?fuseaction=login.login&thread=jump.PRIVATESCHOOLPOLICY&appname=privatesite&frompermissionscheck=true (password required).
- American Association of Medical Colleges. (2006). AAMC Faculty Roster (2006). Table 6: Distribution of U.S. medical school faculty by degree and department. Retrieved November 28, 2007 from http://www.aamc.org/data/facultyroster/usmsf06/06table6.xls.
- American Association of Medical Colleges. (2006). Table 25. In Report on Medical School Faculty Salaries. American Association of Medical Colleges (2005/2006) Data Services, Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- American Association of Medical Colleges. (2007). Special report of full-time faculty counts by department, degree and tenure status as of December 31, 2006. Based on AAMC Faculty Roster data. Retrieved December 10, 2007 (report not publicly available).Google Scholar
- American Psychological Association. (2006). Faculty Salary Survey. APA Research Office, Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Ahrens, E. H. (1992). The crisis in clinical research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Brainard, J. (2004). What the NIH bought with double the money. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(22), A17. Google Scholar
- Ellis, F. J. (1999). Jury out on the effect of post-tenure review on academic life. Academic Physician and Scientist, May-June, 1–5.Google Scholar
- Eells, T. D. (2003). The role of the Ph.D. in medical school clinical departments. Workshop presented for the University of Louisville, School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, October 2003.Google Scholar
- Eells, T. D. (2004). Faculty development and the special needs of Ph.D.s in clinical departments. Breakfast roundtable discussion for the AAMC Group on Faculty Affairs Development Conference, Tampa, FL, February 2004.Google Scholar
- Herman, S. S., & Singer, A. M. (1985). Basic scientists in clinical departments: A fast-growing component of medical school faculty. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
- Liaison Committee on Medical Education. (2007). Functions and structure of a medical school: Accreditation standards. Retrieved December 1, 2007 from http://www.lcme.org/pubs.htm.
- National Institutes of Health. (2005). NIH Roadmap. Retrieved November 28, 2007 from http://www.nihroadmap.nih.gov/.
- Schweitzer, L. (2007). The status of Ph.D.s in U.S. medical schools. Paper presented at the Association for Psychologists in Academic Health Centers, Minneapolis, MN, May 2007.Google Scholar