The Forgotten Faculty: Challenges for Ph.D.s in Clinical Medical School Departments



The data and discussion contained in this invited paper are based on the opening plenary by the first author whose paper titled “The Status of Ph.D.s in US Medical Schools” was presented at the 3rd national conference of the Association of Psychologists in Academic Health Centers, Minneapolis, MN, May 2007. The significant growth of the number of Ph.D.s in clinical departments is described, as is their distribution. The roles they play; the barriers they face in terms of leadership opportunities, promotion and tenure; and the concerns they voice that are specific to this population are also discussed. Salary differentials between Ph.D.s on main and medical school campuses are provided. Recommendations for future investigation of disparate treatment and for faculty development opportunities specifically aimed at this group are found at the conclusion of the paper.


Faculty development Faculty compensation Promotion and tenure 


  1. American Association of Medical Colleges. (2005). AAMC Faculty Policies Search Tool. Retrieved December 5, 2005 from (password required).
  2. American Association of Medical Colleges. (2006). AAMC Faculty Roster (2006). Table 6: Distribution of U.S. medical school faculty by degree and department. Retrieved November 28, 2007 from
  3. American Association of Medical Colleges. (2006). Table 25. In Report on Medical School Faculty Salaries. American Association of Medical Colleges (2005/2006) Data Services, Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. American Association of Medical Colleges. (2007). Special report of full-time faculty counts by department, degree and tenure status as of December 31, 2006. Based on AAMC Faculty Roster data. Retrieved December 10, 2007 (report not publicly available).Google Scholar
  5. American Psychological Association. (2006). Faculty Salary Survey. APA Research Office, Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  6. Ahrens, E. H. (1992). The crisis in clinical research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Arias, I. M. (1989). Sounding board: Training basic scientists to bridge the gap between basic science and its application to human disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 321, 972–974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. (2006). The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 89–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brainard, J. (2004). What the NIH bought with double the money. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(22), A17. Google Scholar
  10. Bunton, S. A. P., & Mallon, W. T. E. (2006). The impact of centers and institutes on faculty life: Findings from a study of basic science and internal medicine faculty at research-intensive medical schools. Academic Medicine, 81, 734–743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bunton, S. A. P., & Mallon, W. T. E. (2007). The continued evolution of faculty appointment and tenure policies at U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine, 82, 281–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis, F. J. (1999). Jury out on the effect of post-tenure review on academic life. Academic Physician and Scientist, May-June, 1–5.Google Scholar
  13. Eells, T. D. (2003). The role of the Ph.D. in medical school clinical departments. Workshop presented for the University of Louisville, School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, October 2003.Google Scholar
  14. Eells, T. D. (2004). Faculty development and the special needs of Ph.D.s in clinical departments. Breakfast roundtable discussion for the AAMC Group on Faculty Affairs Development Conference, Tampa, FL, February 2004.Google Scholar
  15. Fang, D. P., & Meyer, R. E. M. D. (2003). Ph.D. faculty in clinical departments of U.S. medical schools, 1981–1999: Their widening presence and roles in research. Academic Medicine, 78, 167–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Herman, S. S., & Singer, A. M. (1985). Basic scientists in clinical departments: A fast-growing component of medical school faculty. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, R. F., & Gold, J. S. (1998). Faculty appointment and tenure policies in medical schools: 1997 status report. Academic Medicine, 73, 212–219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, R. F., & Gold, J. S. (2001). The present and future of appointment, tenure, and compensation policies for medical school faculty. Academic Medicine, 76, 993–1004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. (2007). Functions and structure of a medical school: Accreditation standards. Retrieved December 1, 2007 from
  20. Liu, M., & Mallon, W. T. (2004). Tenure in transition: Trends in basic science faculty appointment policies at U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine, 79, 205–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mandel, H. G., & The National Caucus of Basic Biomedical Science Chairs (1997). Downsizing of basic science departments in U.S. Medical School: Perceptions of their chairs. Academic Medicine, 72, 894–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National Institutes of Health. (2005). NIH Roadmap. Retrieved November 28, 2007 from
  23. Schweitzer, L. (2007). The status of Ph.D.s in U.S. medical schools. Paper presented at the Association for Psychologists in Academic Health Centers, Minneapolis, MN, May 2007.Google Scholar
  24. Schweitzer, L. P., & Eells, T. D. (2007). Post-tenure review at the University of Louisville School of Medicine: A faculty development and revitalization tool. Academic Medicine, 82, 713–717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bassett HealthcareCooperstownUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of Louisville School of MedicineLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations