Hope, Social Support, and Postpartum Depression: Disentangling the Mediating Effects of Negative Affectivity

Abstract

We examined the potentially mediating effects of negative affectivity (NA) on the hope–depression relationship among a sample of postpartum women. We also assessed the social support reported by these women and examined the possible mediating effects of NA on the social support–postpartum depression relationship. Correlational analyses of data obtained from women (N = 98) who had given birth in the previous 6 months revealed that NA did not mediate either hope or social support in the prediction of postpartum depression. Hope accounted for a significant degree of variance in postpartum depression. These data suggest that hope has palliative effects among women following childbirth and these effects are not nullified or explained by emotional predispositions.

Key Words

hope postpartum depression negative affectivity social support 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Affleck, G., & Tennen, H. (1996). Construing benefits from adversity: Adaptational significanceand dispositional underpinnings. Journal of Personality, 64, 899–922.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnum, D. D., Snyder, C. R., Rapoff, M. A., Mani, M., & Thompson, R. (1998). Hope and social support in the psychological adjustment of children who have survived burn injuries and their matched controls. Children's Health Care, 27, 15–30.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Waller, N. (1992). “Normal” personality inventories in clinical assessment; General requirements and the potential for using the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolger, N., & Eckenrode, E. J. (1991). Social relationships, personality, and anxiety during amajor stressful event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 440–449.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyce, P. (1994). Personality dysfunction, marital problems and postnatal depression. In J. Cox & J. Holden (Eds.), Perinatal psychiatry: Use and misuse of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (pp. 82–102). London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
  7. Boyce, P. (2003). Risk factors for postnatal depression: A review and risk factors in Australian populations. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 6(Suppl. 2), s43–s50.Google Scholar
  8. Boyce, P., Hickie, I., & Parker, G. (1991). Parents, partners or personality? Risk factors for post-natal depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 21, 245–255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins, N. L., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Lobel, M., & Scrimshaw, S. C. (1993). Social support in pregnancy: Psychosocial correlates of birth outcomes and postpartum depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1243–1258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. (1987). Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: Is the barkworse than the bite? Journal of Personality, 55, 299–316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox, J. L. (1994). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. In J. Cox & J. Holden (Eds.), Perinatal psychiatry: Use and misuse of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (pp. 115–124). London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
  12. Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburg postnatal depression scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782–786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cutrona, C. (1984). Social support and transition to parenthood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 378–390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliott, T., Marmarosh, C., & Pickelman, H. (1994). Negative affectivity, social support, and the prediction of depression and distress. Journal of Personality, 62, 299–319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott, T., Shewchuk, R., Richeson, C., Pickelman, H., & Franklin, K. W. (1996). Problem-solving appraisal and the prediction of depression during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 645–651.Google Scholar
  16. Elliott, T., Witty, T., Herrick, S., & Hoffman, J. (1991). Negotiating reality after physical loss: Hope, depression, and disability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 608–613.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans, G. W., & Lepore, S. J. (1997). Moderating and mediating processes in environment-behavior research. In G. T. Moore & R. W. Marans (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design, Vol. 4. (pp. 255–285). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  18. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1968). Manual for the Eysenck Personality Inventory. SanDiego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
  19. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1991). EPQ-R short scale. London: Hodder & Stroughton.Google Scholar
  20. Holden, J. (1994). Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale in clinical practice. In J. Cox and J. Holden (Eds.), Perinatal psychiatry: Use and misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale (pp. 125–144). London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
  21. Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Horton, T., & Wallander, J. L. (2001). Hope and social support as resilience factors against psychological distress of mothers who care for children with chronicphysical conditions. Rehabilitation Psychology, 46, 382–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackson, W. T., Taylor, R., Palmatier, A., Elliott, T., & Elliott, J. L. (1998). Negotiating the reality of visual impairment: Hope, coping, and functional ability. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 5, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis, H. A., & Kliewer, W. (1996). Hope, coping, and adjustment among children with sickle cell disease: Tests of mediator and moderator models. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 21, 25–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. O'Hara, M. W. (1994). Postpartum depression: Identification and measurement in a cross-cultural context. In J. Cox & J. Holden (Eds.), Perinatal psychiatry: Use and misuse of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (pp. 145–168). London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
  26. Pitt, B. (1968). “Atypical” depression following childbirth. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 1325–1335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Power, M. J., Champion, L., & Aris, S. (1988). The development of a measure of social support: The Significant Others (SOS) scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 94–103.Google Scholar
  28. Rhodewalt, F., & Zone, J. B. (1989). Appraisal of life change, depression, and illness in hardyand nonhardy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 81–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shewchuk, R., Elliott, T., MacNair, R. R., & Harkins, S. (1999). Trait influences on stress appraisal and coping: An evaluation of alternative frameworks. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 685–704.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, T., Pope, M., Rhodewalt, F., & Poulton, J. (1989). Optimism, neuroticism, coping, and symptom reports: An alternative interpretation of the Life Orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 640–648.Google Scholar
  31. Snyder, C. R. (1994). The psychology of hope: You can get there from here. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows of the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snyder, C. R., Cheavens, J., & Michael, S. T. (1999). Hoping. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 205–251). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Snyder, C. R., Feldman, D., Taylor, J., Schroeder, L., & Adams, V., III (2000). The roles of hopeful thinking in preventing problems and enhancing strengths. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 15, 262–295.Google Scholar
  35. Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. Holleran, S., Irving, L., Sigman, S., et al. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570–585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Michael, S. T., & Cheavens, J. (2000). The optimism and hope constructs:Variants on a positive expectancy theme. In E. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and pessimism (pp. 103–124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Press.Google Scholar
  37. Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S., Ybasco, F., Borders, T., Babyak, M., & Higgins, R. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 321–335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Watson, D., & Clark, L. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. (1989). Health complaints, stress and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234–254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (1992). Personality and psychopathology: An application of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 363–393.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.University of Alabama at BirminghamBirmingham
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirmingham

Personalised recommendations