Advertisement

Beyond the Borderline: Expanding Our Repertoire to Address Relational Patterns and Power Dynamics Attendant to Diverse Personality Disorders

  • Kenneth L. Critchfield
  • Julia Dobner-Pereira
  • Mariafé T. Panizo
  • Kirstin Drucker
Original Paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

A present challenge in our field is that diverse and frequently comorbid patterns of personality disorder are not sufficiently addressed by existing evidence-based treatments. Authors in the special section describe promising efforts to address this challenge, including case examples illustrating the utility of each approach. Each approach is consistent with evidence-based principles of change, suggesting the possibility of placing them together within a meta-theoretical integration frame (Magnavita and Anchin in Unifying psychotherapy: Principles, methods, and evidence from clinical science, Springer Publishing Co, New York, 2014). Common threads include use of an individualized case formulation to tailor treatment to diverse patterns; incorporation of affect, behavior, and cognition; and modification of attachment-linked, internal templates using both didactic and experiential forms of learning. Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy (IRT), our favored approach, offers a similar language and framework, leaving technical choices to the clinician so long as they are consistent with an attachment-based, interpersonal case formulation, and are helpful in establishing new patterns toward adaptive goals. Work with IRT suggests ways to extend further the focus on internalized representations. Direct conversation with “family in the head” can be used to enhance ways of being, thinking, and feeling that allow distance and differentiation from problematic internalizations of loved ones. The authors present suggestions for future research, emphasizing the therapeutic relationship as well as the need to measure therapeutic optimality in a tailored, context-specific manner focused on mechanisms of psychopathology and change.

Notes

Compliance With Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Benjamin, L. S. (2003/2006). Interpersonal reconstructive therapy: Promoting change in nonresponders. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin, L. S. (2008). What is functional about functional autonomy? Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(5), 412–420.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802248596.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin, L. S. (2018). Interpersonal reconstructive therapy for anger, anxiety, and depression: It’s about broken hearts, not broken brains. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0000090-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beutler, L. E., Harwood, T. M., Michelson, A., Song, X., & Holman, J. (2011). Resistance/reactance level. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20753.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds: I. Aetiology and psychopathology in the light of attachment theory. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 201–210.  https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.130.3.201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarkin, J. F., Levy, K. N., Lenzenweger, M. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2007). Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: A multiwave study. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(6), 922–928.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.164.6.922.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Critchfield, K. L., & Benjamin, L. S. (2006). Principles for psychosocial treatment of personality disorder: Summary of the APA Division 12 Task Force/NASPR review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 661–674.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Critchfield, K. L., & Benjamin, L. S. (in preparation). Activating mechanisms of change to enhance outcomes during Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy (IRT) with comorbid, often rehospitalized, dysfunctional and suicidal patients. James Madison University & University of Utah.Google Scholar
  9. Critchfield, K. L., Benjamin, L. S., & Levenick, K. (2015). Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of case formulations for comorbid profiles in interpersonal reconstructive therapy: Addressing mechanisms of psychopathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(4), 547–573.  https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Critchfield, K. L., Clarkin, J. F., Levy, K. N., & Kernberg, O. F. (2008). Organization of co-occurring Axis II features in borderline personality disorder. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(2), 185–200.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466507X240731.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fassbinder, E., & Arntz, A. (2018). Schema therapy with emotionally inhibited and fearful patients. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-018-9396-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gordon-King, K., Schweitzer, R. D., & Dimaggio, G. (2018). Metacognitive interpersonal therapy for personality disorders: the case of a man with obsessive–compulsive personality disorder and avoidant personality disorder. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-018-9404-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kernberg, O. F., & Caligor, E. (2005). A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. In M. F. Lenzenweger & J. F. Clarkin (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (pp. 114–156). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kramer, U., & Stiles, W. B. (2015). The responsiveness problem in psychotherapy: A review of proposed solutions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 22(3), 277–295.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Magnavita, J. J., & Anchin, J. C. (2014). Unifying psychotherapy: Principles, methods, and evidence from clinical science. New York: Springer Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  16. Popolo, R., MacBeth, A., Canfora, F., Rebecchi, D., Toselli, C., Salvatore, G., & Dimaggio, G. (2018). Metacognitive interpersonal therapy in groups for over-regulated personality disorders: A single case study. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-018-9401-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sachse, R., & Kramer, U. (2018). Clarification-oriented psychotherapy of dependent personality disorder. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-018-9397-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shahar, G., Blatt, S. J., Zuroff, D. C., Krupnick, J. L., & Sotsky, S. M. (2004). Perfectionism impedes social relations and response to brief treatment for depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 140–154.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.2.140.31017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simonsen, S., Eikenæs, I. U. M., Nørgaard, N. L., Normann-Eide, E., Juul, S., & Wilberg, T. (2018). Specialized treatment for patients with severe avoidant personality disorder: experiences from Scandinavia. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-018-9395-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Graduate PsychologyJames Madison UniversityHarrisonburgUSA

Personalised recommendations