Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 217–225 | Cite as

Mentalization-Based Treatment in Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis: A Rationale and Clinical Illustration

  • Martin DebbanéEmail author
  • Jallal Benmiloud
  • George Salaminios
  • Alessandra Solida-Tozzi
  • Marco Armando
  • Peter Fonagy
  • Anthony Bateman
Original Paper


Developmental clinical research in recent years has highlighted the value treating psychotic disorders at the earliest stage to reduce long-term morbidity. It is now suggested that treatment during the clinical high risk states (CHR), preceding by 1–4 years the onset of psychotic disorders, may delay or prevent the onset of psychosis, and contribute to a more positive prognosis. In this article, we wish to provide a rationale and clinical illustration of mentalization-based treatment (MBT) as an indicated preventive treatment for CHR. We will first review the notion of high-risk for psychosis, providing a trans-theoretical developmental framework for conceptualizing the clinical progression from sub-clinical towards clinical psychotic states. Second, we address the commonalities and differences between the constructs of mentalization and metacognition, and discuss their relevance in preventive psychotherapeutic treatment for CHR. Thirdly, we provide a clinical illustration of MBT to emerging psychosis. Finally, we conclude by discussing the specific contributions of MBT approach in youths at CHR, and the necessary research for evaluating its relevance in the context of risk for developing psychosis.


Mentalizing Schizophrenia Schizotypy Psychodynamic Prevention 



We would like to thank Deborah Badoud, Yasmina Lakeshaft Lachat, and Larisa Morosan for their help on the manuscript.


This work was funded by a Swiss National Science Foundation Grant (100019-159440) awarded to M.D.

Compliance with Ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declare any conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

The patient described in this manuscript gave her full consent after reading the excerpts of text relating to her treatment.


  1. Arnedo, J., Svrakic, D. M., Del Val, C., Romero-Zaliz, R., Hernandez-Cuervo, H., Genetics, Molecular, et al. (2015). Uncovering the hidden risk architecture of the schizophrenias: Confirmation in three independent genome-wide association studies. Am J Psychiatry, 172(2), 139–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartels-Velthuis, A. A., Blijd-Hoogewys, E. M., & van Os, J. (2011). Better theory-of-mind skills in children hearing voices mitigate the risk of secondary delusion formation. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 124(3), 193–197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman, A. W., & Fonagy, P. (2012). Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice. Arlington: Am Psychiatr Publ.Google Scholar
  4. Bateman, A. W., & Fonagy, P. (2016). mentalization-based treatment for personality disorders: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clin Psychol-Sci Pract, 11(3), 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brent, B., & Fonagy, P. (2014). A mentalization-based treatment approach to disturbances of social understanding in schizophrenia. In P. H. Lysaker, G. Dimaggio, & M. Brüne (Eds.), Social cognition and metacognition in schizophrenia (pp. 245–257). Sam Diego: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemmensen, L., van Os, J., Drukker, M., Munkholm, A., Rimvall, M. K., Vaever, M., et al. (2015). Psychotic experiences and hyper-theory-of-mind in preadolescence—a birth cohort study. Psychol Med, 46, 1–15.Google Scholar
  8. Debbané, M. (2015). Schizotypy: A developmental perspective. In O. Mason & G. Claridge (Eds.), Schizotypy: New dimensions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Debbané, M. (2016). Mentaliser. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur.Google Scholar
  10. Debbané, M., Eliez, S., Badoud, D., Conus, P., Fluckiger, R., & Schultze-Lutter, F. (2015). Developing psychosis and its risk states through the lens of schizotypy. Schizophr Bull, 41(Suppl 2), S396–S407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Debbané, M., Salaminios, G., Badoud, D., Luyten, P., Solida-Tozzi, A., Fonagy, P., et al. (under review). Attachment, neurobiology, and mentalization along the psychosis continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Dimaggio, G., Montano, A., Popolo, R., & Salvatore, G. (2015). Metacognitive interpersonal therapy for personality disorders: A treatment manual. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Emsley, R., Chiliza, B., Asmal, L., & Harvey, B. H. (2013). The nature of relapse in schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Fonagy, P. (1991). Thinking about thinking: some clinical and theoretical considerations in the treatment of a borderline patient. [Case reports]. Int J Psychoanal, 72(4), 639–656.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fonagy, P., & Allison, E. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychother (Chic), 51(3), 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. W. (2016). Adversity, attachment, and mentalizing. Compr Psychiatry, 64, 59–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2009). A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Dev Psychopathol, 21(4), 1355–1381.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill, M., Crumlish, N., Clarke, M., Whitty, P., Owens, E., Renwick, L., et al. (2012). Prospective relationship of duration of untreated psychosis to psychopathology and functional outcome over 12 years. Schizophr Res, 141(2–3), 215–221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychol Bull, 114(1), 3–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Katznelson, H. (2014). Reflective functioning: a review. Clin Psychol Rev, 34(2), 107–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lecours, S., & Bouchard, M. A. (1997). Dimensions of mentalisation: Outlining levels of psychic transformation. Int J Psychoanal, 78, 855–875.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Luyten, P., & Fonagy, P. (2015). The neurobiology of mentalizing. Pers Disord, 6(4), 366–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mayes, L. C. (2000). A developmental perspective on the regulation of arousal states. Sem Perinatol, 24(4), 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGlashan, T. H., Walsh, B. C., & Woods, S. W. (2010). The psychosis-risk prodrome: handbook for diagnosis and follow-up. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Murray, R. J., Debbane, M., Fox, P. T., Bzdok, D., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2015). Functional connectivity mapping of regions associated with self- and other-processing. Hum Brain Mapp, 36(4), 1304–1324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nelson, B., Yuen, H. P., Wood, S. J., Lin, A., Spiliotacopoulos, D., Bruxner, A., et al. (2013). Long-term follow-up of a group at ultra high risk (“prodromal”) for psychosis: The PACE 400 study. [Evaluation studies research support, non-US Gov’t]. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(8), 793–802.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind. Behav Brain Sci, 1(4), 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rapado-Castro, M., McGorry, P. D., Yung, A., Calvo, A., & Nelson, B. (2015). Sources of clinical distress in young people at ultra high risk of psychosis. Schizophr Res, 165(1), 15–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossouw, T. I., & Fonagy, P. (2012). Mentalization-based treatment for self-harm in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 51(12), 1304–1313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rudrauf, D. (2014). Structure-function relationships behind the phenomenon of cognitive resilience in neurology: Insights for neuroscience and medicine. Adv Neurosci, 4, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schimmelmann, B. G., Michel, C., Martz-Irngartinger, A., Linder, C., & Schultze-Lutter, F. (2015). Age matters in the prevalence and clinical significance of ultra-high-risk for psychosis symptoms and criteria in the general population: Findings from the BEAR and BEARS-kid studies. World Psychiatry, 14(2), 189–197.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Schultze-Lutter, F., Debbane, M., Theodoridou, A., Wood, S. J., Raballo, A., Michel, C., et al. (2016). Revisiting the basic symptom concept: Toward translating risk symptoms for psychosis into neurobiological targets. Front Psychiatry, 7, 9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Schultze-Lutter, F., Michel, C., Schmidt, S. J., Schimmelmann, B. G., Maric, N. P., Salokangas, R. K., et al. (2015). EPA guidance on the early detection of clinical high risk states of psychoses. Eur Psychiatry, 30(3), 405–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2007). Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3054–3067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Solms, M. (2013). The conscious id. Psyche-Zeitschrift Fur Psychoanalyse Und Ihre Anwendungen, 67(9–10), 991.Google Scholar
  36. van Donkersgoed, R. J. M., De Jong, S., Van der Gaag, M., Aleman, A., Lysaker, P. H., Wunderink, L., et al. (2014). A manual-based individual therapy to improve metacognition in schizophrenia: Protocol of a multi-center RCT. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Debbané
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Jallal Benmiloud
    • 2
  • George Salaminios
    • 3
  • Alessandra Solida-Tozzi
    • 5
  • Marco Armando
    • 2
  • Peter Fonagy
    • 3
    • 4
  • Anthony Bateman
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Developmental Clinical Psychology Research Unit, Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Office Médico-Pédagogique Research Unit, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Geneva School of MedicineGenevaSwitzerland
  3. 3.Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.Anna Freud CentreLondonUK
  5. 5.Department of Psychiatry, Service of General PsychiatryLausanne University Hospital (CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations